WikiLeaks defectors form OpenLeaks.org

Several key members of WikiLeaks have resigned and are forming a new organization called Openleaks, which hopes to do what WikiLeaks is trying to do without the drama.

WikiLeaks, a site designed to stir up controversy, has some dirty laundry of its own. Several key staff from the whistleblowing site, have resigned and will launch a new website on Monday, reports DN.se. The main reason for the defection, they said, is the public political persona, personal problems, and dictatorship-like management style of Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder. The new site will be called Openleaks.

“Our long term goal is to build a strong, transparent platform to support whistleblowers–both in terms of technology and politics–while at the same time encouraging others to start similar projects,” said one of the founders of the new site. ”As a short-term goal, this is about completing the technical infrastructure and ensuring that the organization continues to be democratically governed by all its members, rather than limited to one group or individual,” said the owners of the new site, Openleaks.

Don’t put yourself in the story

Unlike WikiLeaks, Openleaks doesn’t intend to make itself the story (one of the primary tenets of journalism) by making brash public statements like Assange often does, or releasing thousands of documents that serve no real purpose. Instead, they hope to a neutral intermediary: a place where whistleblowers can anonymously send information and media outlets can privately review it and write on it. The organization would not have publicly released 250,000 State dept cables (emails), for example.

“As a result of our intention not to publish any document directly and in our own name, we do not expect to experience the kind of political pressure which WikiLeaks is under at this time,” said members of Openleaks. “In that aspect, it is quite interesting to see how little of politicians’ anger seems directed at the newspapers using WikiLeaks sources.”

Problems at WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks has been under an intense amount of corporate and Gov’t backlash for publicly posting 250,000 private U.S. State Dept. emails. Little of the information is damaging, but much of it is embarrassing. The controversy escalated when members of the Gov’t like Sen. Joe Lieberman began issuing orders to companies to stop working with WikiLeaks. Amazon, EveryDNS, Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal have all suspended the organization’s accounts, due to Gov’t pressure, but no formal charges against WikiLeaks yet exist–the organization has not broken the law. Julian Assange, however, was arrested in the U.K. Tuesday on a Swedish warrant. He faces charges of consensual sex without a condom.

The controversy has spawned a virtual Internet hacking war. WikiLeaks has been under constant Ddos attacks (attacks that flood websites with hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of hits at once, causing their servers to crash and the sites to go offline) and in return, supporters from 4chan have launched a war against those who hurt WikiLeaks, called “Operation Payback.”

Showing 13 comments

  1. Aashok Udaya Nandana at 7:24am 1st January 2011 Valuble option. Good luck
  2. edlindaspy at 1:11pm 26th December 2010 What concerns me is openleaks going to be as credible? Am sure that question will arise
  3. Sum1smarterthanU at 8:30am 22nd December 2010 Just like all entities w/ power, all the leak groups will start picking and shoosing their battles to reflect their supporters rather than who is right and wrong. It will become another liberal agenda to manipulate people into needing daddy(i.e. the govt.) Controling and manipulating the feelings and ideas of the sheep(i.e. those who support the cables)
  4. One Real at 12:44pm 18th December 2010 The government shouldn't have messed with WikiLeaks approach to freedom of speach. It all about BIG BROTHER beginning to show it true color and it self!
  5. dorian rayn at 12:40pm 15th December 2010 Divide and conquer. Since they cannot "buy' Julian's silence they buy out the cogs who worked for him. Typical.
  6. rose at 9:10pm 14th December 2010 Yeah right, Openleaks will send out information directly to the corporate media. Which will twist the information to fit it's own purpose. Which means that the public will never get the real truth. So, Openleaks, who is paying you big dollars? Would it be the facist corporate media?
  7. Mark at 7:32am 13th December 2010 This is why the government shouldn't have messed with WikiLeaks approach to freedom of speach. WikiLeaks made every effort to ensure no one (or as few as possibly) come to any harm. Open leaks will not verify material meaning this new site could become quite dangerous to people. Julian had a good approach to these cables in very few (if any) people would get hurt. However thanks to the "wonderful" idiots in government they have messed this us.
  8. Catarina at 3:07pm 10th December 2010 Julian Assange was not arrested in Sweden "the other day"! It was in the UK on December 7th...
    1. Mina at 7:26pm 10th December 2010 And the charges are not for rape either, it's 'consensual sex without a condom' and 'surprise sex'.
      1. @JeffreyVC at 1:32am 11th December 2010 I apologize. It was a Swedish warrant, but a U.K. arrest. I've corrected the post. As for the charges, I cannot find verification of that. How can you charge someone with surprise sex? Either it is consensual or it isn't.
        1. Ben Carr at 2:44pm 12th December 2010 The woman consented to sex with a condom. under Swedish law if the condom breaks charges may be filed.
          1. @JeffreyVC at 3:20am 13th December 2010 Interesting. Gotcha
      2. Sum1smarterthanU at 10:05am 14th December 2010 Is suprise sex, when she wakes up and sees him in her?? Did he pop out of a va-J-J and say suprise I'm coming!
Close Suggestion YouTube removes video time limits
View Article