Anonymous

Visa was crippled by a denial of service attack this afternoon, making it the second major U.S. credit card company to find itself in the sights of the hacktivist group Anonymous, which claims to be avenging WikiLeaks.

Anonymous has claimed its next victim. The latest site to fall to Anonymous was Visa, which succumbed to denial of service attacks today. The site has been intermittently available following the launch of the attack in the late afternoon. These nonstop digital assaults, known as “Operation Avenge Assange,” or “Operation Payback,” should have some of Wikileaks’ other detractors nervous.

Anonymous, a group of hackers, have taken it upon themselves to take down all websites of companies that denied WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, support. MasterCard was hit by a denial of service attack this morning, and is still inaccessible on some browsers (although it now appears to be working on Firefox).

Visa and MasterCard both suspended payments to WikiLeaks recently, and earned the wrath of the hacktivists. Visa reportedly told The New York Times today that its site was “experiencing heavier than normal traffic,” but failed to explain further.

The Anonymous Twitter account has been updating followers on its progress, but its account is now suspended. Twitter and Facebook both claim to not be taking down WikiLeaks’ pages this morning, but apparently the hackers themselves are fair game. Both social networking sites still feature the government whistleblower’s accounts.

Mashable posted a recap of all sites that have been affected since the group began its attack yesterday:

  • Mastercard’s website
  • Senator Joe Lieberman’s website (which only sustained a 12 minute outage); he also received faulty faxes from the group
  • Sarah Palin’s website
  • PostFinance, a Swiss postal service bank, was taken offline and also sent spam via fax
  • The website of the lawyer representing the women accusing Assange of rape and assault
  • The laywer prosecuting Assange’s website

Anonymous has vowed to also hit PayPal, and Amazon could be a potential target as well. Whoever is next, Anonymous isn’t giving up anytime soon, telling NYT, “We fight for the same reason. We want transparency and we counter censorship.”

Showing 12 comments

  1. Todd at 11:32am 11th December 2010 Anon - Hardly about free speech. Just another group of bullies. If you are going to publicly relase information it needs to be put in context and for the public good. Wikileaks would have more support if they acted like a responsible news agency and not simply a laundering house. How does a list of critical infrastructure, for example, hold "the man" accountable or serve any public interest? I once supported them but find their tactics becoming more like the spurned blogger at home with an axe to grind or seeking notoriety by whatever drivel they can release.
    1. Sum1smarterthanU at 10:06am 13th December 2010 ::Yawn: What a dream, I drempt that the world can be crushed by hackers. AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA. What a bunch of tards. I can survive without the net. I do't even believe in credit cards or any credit for that matter. Fear the "anonymouse" AHAHAHAHA what a joke. They're tactics are no different than a kid egging a house because they got yelled at for doing something wrong. Hey anon, what does mommy bring to your "ferry Lair" when your hungry?? Does she bring you a warm glass of milk, or maybe a nice lubricated fifi with a picture of rosie odonnel? Todd, They are not bullies just flies on the wall, Bullies acutually bully people, these guys just buzz and piss everyone else off.
      1. Bill at 11:49pm 14th December 2010 Learn to spell and write coherently.
        1. Sum1smarterthanU at 8:29am 15th December 2010 Thanks officer Bill I'll remember that when I write your wife that thank you letter I dont wanna misspell cum, she might not swallow next time. Get a life and argue the point. I will not write a book about how idiocratic anon is. I have better things to do. So I simplified it. Figured it would be simpler for yall, this aint in a text book so I dont think you could understand what i am saying.
  2. Anon at 7:14am 10th December 2010 Wake up. We don't have a leader. Everything starts small. "Wow they ddod'ed a senators website ooh that must leave Leiberman trembling in the wake of their "puny" devistation." People said the same thing when Wikileaks first started. "Ooooh they released sensitive internal State Police documents regarding arrest procedures." Look at them now. Just because you have just heard of us and think we have done nothing doesn't change fact. Do your research on Anon, and find out who you're talking about. Wake up. -Anon
    1. Bill at 11:47pm 14th December 2010 I've done research. You guys got shut the F down by scientology
  3. Realist at 11:47am 9th December 2010 The hacktivist have no tact or and leadership knowledge at all. These are just some losers who want to be a part of something more than the Proactive Challenge. Wow they ddod'ed a senators website ooh that must leave Leiberman trembling in the wake of their "puny" devistation. I guess in order to starve an animal you must give it all the food it wants to get tired of eating. Great logic R-Tards Anonymous. What next are you going to shut down the programming for blues clues because it made you sad??
    1. ky pa at 7:21pm 9th December 2010 lol, and what happens when you ddos lil key-infrastructure like financing? a whole lot of people in business sector is going to get mad, this proactive movement just balled the we can fuck how we want attitude towards wikileaks other way around, they can fuck millions of people, thousands of corporations and people who are trying ot earn income, ie if payment system's neckbreaks for just couple hours theres losses of billions dollars, this should be pretty clear by now, that following laws, morality is essential... and punishing whistleblowers and giving no apparent reason other than "becouse we can." may result unforeseen consequenses and billions of losses in hour. Can you really Afford the injustice when common folk has more acces to knowledge and skill to defend them selves?
  4. skaro964 at 8:36am 9th December 2010 By going after paypal they hurt the everyday person ie the artists whos use PayPal for their transactions also the every day people on e-bay and other sites, who do not do enough business to buy their own equipment.
    1. hobbit at 10:56pm 9th December 2010 Paypal has hurt these everyday people. I have stopped using paypal. i reject its antiAmerican attack on freedom of speech. By going after freedom, paypal has gone after everyday people.
      1. Bill at 11:45pm 14th December 2010 PayPal has not hurt anyone except Wikileaks which deserves to be hurt. Get a life.
  5. halloran at 6:16pm 8th December 2010 Yawn. Why don't the "hacktivists" take-down Amazon.com's website? Instead, they pursue organizations whose websites are incidental to their businesses (swiss bank, paypal, visa/mastercard). None of the latter organizations rely on their websites in a meaningful commerce manner...except...Amazon.com. The actions of the hacksters lack substance, unlike those who are attacking WikiLeaks’ website...
Close Suggestion First screenshot of Google’s social network, now dubbed Google +1, leaks
View Article