Jakob Nielsen, a usability expert and consultant, recently published a blog post with a thorough critique of the latest operating system from Microsoft. His post was based on the results of 12 experienced PC users testing Windows 8 on regular computers and the new Surface RT tablets.
Nielsen’s top complaint is the company’s decision to run two interfaces – one for tablets and one for desktops – within the one OS. He said the choice to put two user interfaces within the one OS was a critical misstep that made Windows 8 problematic for any level of computer user. He cited learning and remembering where to find specific features, inconsistencies across the two setups, and the high interaction cost of switching between interfaces as the main issues caused by Microsoft’s design choice.
With nearly 80 U.S. patents under his name, Nielsen, a former Sun Microsystems Distinguished Engineer with a PhD in human-computer interaction, knows his stuff. His list of Windows 8 problems continues to the lack of multiple browsing windows in the Modern UI. “The product’s very name has become a misnomer,” he bemoaned. ”‘Windows’ no longer supports multiple windows on the screen.”
Nielsen noted that the OS requires a high learning curve because of the flat nature of the interface. There are no illusions of raised icons or inset fields that people have intuitively come to understand mean they can click on them or type in them. The flatness made it challenging for some of the testers to know where to go in order to complete basic tasks, such as changing the background color of the start screen.
He also questioned why many developers of Live Tiles made overly active widgets without the full name of the application, and called out specific apps (Urbanspoon, Epicurious, LA Times) for offering a low density of information. Inconsistency in the swiping gestures and the decision to hide important features in the Charms section round out his analysis.
Despite the long laundry list of problems and concerns, Nielsen concludes with a disclaimer that he is not anti-Microsoft. He also concurred that people should have an easier go of navigating Windows 8 given enough time. Still, according to Nielsen, these problems will always be there. “People must think to do something, rather than being reminded to do something, and thus users will sometimes neglect useful Win8 features,” Nielsen said.
There’s no denying that Windows 8 has been highly divisive, with fans lauding its impressive developments and critics agreeing with many of Nielsen’s points. Most notably, many of the same points are on both lists. The question of whether or not Windows 8 will be a good fit for you seems to boil down to how steep a learning curve you’re willing to tackle in order to use your computer, and how much you believe in the choice to unify the worlds of tablet and desktop.
Not again with this self-proclaimed “usability” expert! He’s a certified “old guy”, maybe not in chronological years, but in technology. We design medical instruments that involve touchscreens — the “more experienced” medical professionals prefer what they grew up with of physical buttons, mouses and more complex graphics. Those who have entered the professions in the past decade “get it” and prefer the simple icons, touchscreens and gesturing that Windows 8 features. So the two interfaces, legacy and modern are in fact a distinct advantage and fits with scientific measurements of what the spectrum of our customers demand.
Anna — Please stop featuring this fellow’s self-promoting rants as headlines or anything other than opinions. Oh, he’ll be happy to rent out to help Microsoft and anybody else with their GUI — and with all the publicity that he is getting as “the guy who trashes Windows 8″ he should do quite well.
It’s amazing — Microsoft does hundreds of thousands of hours of one-way mirrors, special monitoring software, user panels to determine what users want next — and you print a view of a guy who sat down in front of the finished product a few times. I’m guessing the subject choice by the author or the web site is not a bias against Microsoft.
I also work in medical side of IT. I can tell you this is not agreeable to any of my clients. They want to do work. thats all we care about in biz doing our job.
I have noted a huge diffrence in acceptance from the teens – low 20′s verse the rest of the world. look at the age of the people in the TV and New Spots for windows 8. MS has left the biz world for dead. they are banking on the teens to 20′s growing up to be biz execs and making new software.
There has to be Options. just a simple On / Off button for these Child Like Features of Windows 8
“hundreds of thousands of hours” is clearly not enough.
The medical instruments field is a niche market where touch makes a lot of sense. The displays are usually mounted on the equipment, rather than being a separate desktop. Walk into any medical facility and you will see non-touch desktops being used by all of the business people. Touch makes no sense on a general purpose desktop machine. This expert is correct.
Not only is Metro a terrible desktop interface, it’s also crippling to productivity. I have three large displays attached to my desktop. I normally have at least a dozen applications open at once, spread across all three screens. I also have gadgets along the edge of the third monitor which give me live information that is always visible while I’m working. None of this is possible with Metro. Currently, you are limited to two applications open on a single display. They plan to “expand” the application limit to four in an update. In order to see your live information, you have to go back to the start screen.
Metro is quite obviously a major step backward in usability for myself and many others. This expert is stating quantitative facts, not opinions. Metro suffers from severe limitations which haven’t existed since Windows 1.0. It is the worst desktop interface I’ve seen since DOS. Windows no longer has windows. It should be renamed Microsoft Tiles.
JUST give us the start button back and make the metro an OPTION. i am ok with windows 8. i see it simular to 7…. After installing 3rd party software to kill the Metro menu and giving me the Start button.
I see no reason to upgrade any computers in our company. Infact of the new 5 computers all were downgraded to 7 with downgrade rights. Im sure that is where some of the windows 8 numbers come from.. people need a computer… and then downgrade… or..
the number of products sold does not equal number who are happy.
Anyone surprised by this? Of course the OS is a mess. I think it’s stupid that you can still access the classic desktop in Windows too. That tells people there are really two different interfaces per OS.
Not looking good for MS
I’m a tech savy user and I have a tablet with windows 7 and I won’t upgrade. Why? I can’t disable touch easily in Windows 8! they removed the tab that allowed me to disable it. 90%of the time I operate my tablet with the stylus. I use the stylus so that my clients can sign contracts on the screen using acrobat pro.
For you brainiacs out there that think touch is everything, think again.. can you imagine teaching every single client how to use the pen every time! It was so frustrating until I was able to pin pen and touch settings to the task bar. If you google “how to disable pen and touch settings in windows 8″ there’s a lot of people with the same problem. These aren’t old users either.. these are graphic designers using photoshop etc.. these are also tech savy users.. what they need is a hard button on the tablet to switch on or off touch.. or floating button.
If they had left the Start Menu alone and just added the icons on the the other surface. What they are doing is trying to get us to give up a form of computing that many of us have become comfortable with. I also use an Android Tablet, and am happy with that. If I want to do anything concerning the Tablet, I can usually find it in Settings. They are starting for scratch for many users, and they will adapt easier. I think that when we use windows, we want to current desktop style and when we go to a tablet, we can adapt to the way that is organized. I still prefer W7 for doing most things, but that is because I am familiar with that. For my Nexus 10, I realize that there is a learning curve and am content to learn as I go along. I am one of the lucky ones that don’t have to depend on a tablet for my full Internet experience. I personally think that Microsoft “Shot themselves in the Foot” on W8.