<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.digitaltrends.com/xml/digitaltrends.xsd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .XXX Domains Back on the Table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/xxx-domains-back-on-the-table/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/xxx-domains-back-on-the-table/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gaul</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/xxx-domains-back-on-the-table/#comment-129377</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=267842#comment-129377</guid>
		<description>And an easy way to block them through parental controls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And an easy way to block them through parental controls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rusty_shackleford_33</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/xxx-domains-back-on-the-table/#comment-129375</link>
		<dc:creator>rusty_shackleford_33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=267842#comment-129375</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I don&#039;t see the harm in implementing these. We already have different domain designations for other types of sites, adult sites should be no different. They&#039;re going to be around whether .xxx exists or not, might as well give them a clear way to categorize themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I don&#39;t see the harm in implementing these. We already have different domain designations for other types of sites, adult sites should be no different. They&#39;re going to be around whether .xxx exists or not, might as well give them a clear way to categorize themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-14 14:45:15 -->
