Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Computing
  4. News

Disney scanner identifies devices from electromagnetic signals

Add as a preferred source on Google

Without its case, its wallpaper, and any scratches its screen might have picked up, could you tell your smartphone apart from another example of the same model? Probably not, but a team of researchers at Disney have found a way to do just that with a $10 scanner and a computer program.

The team, working as part of the Disney Research program, found that every piece of technology has its own electromagnetic signal — even those that are the same make and model. With this knowledge in hand, the researchers set about creating a scanner that could pluck this information out of the air.

Recommended Videos

Technicians tested 40 devices, covering a broad swathe of consumer electronics. Fluorescent tube light bulbs, lightsaber toys, iPhones, MacBooks and Dell LCD displays were all scanned, according to a report from Engadget. The scan works by feeding electromagnetic signals into a program that seeks out 1,000 frequency responses to create an identifier known as an EM-ID.

The lightsaber seems to have been the most successful test subject, as it was identified perfectly thirty times — typically strong brand cohesion from Disney. The scanner also did well with the Dell monitors and the MacBooks, maintaining an average identification accuracy of 94.7 and 94.6 percent for each device, respectively.

However, when attempting to identify iPhone 6 handsets, the scanner was only able to achieve an average accuracy of 71.2 percent. The research team is attributing this drop to the smartphone’s frequency distribution, which can sometimes overlap between individual devices that are part of the same product generation.

Disney hopes that this technology might one day replace current methods of inventory management. The scanner could feasibly track individual items by their unique EM-ID, which would negate the need for more expensive solutions like RFID tagging.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more