robots-crazy-factory-terminator-salvation

Scholars and roboticists sought for upcoming conference that will explore the laws surrounding robots and their rights.

Now that we’re starting to embrace the impending robot revolution, it’s probably a good time to start thinking about the legal issues surrounding robot-human coexistence. Thankfully, the University of Miami School of Law is already on top of the issue, and is organizing a conference to discuss how the law should be interpreted when it comes to robots.

Called “We Robot: Inaugural Conference on Legal and Policy Issues Relating to Robotics,” the conference is looking for lawyers and scholars of all manner, as well as robot designers and engineers with information and/or projects that would enhance the discussion. The school’s website offers a list of topics it hopes to address in the conference, including:

Effect of robotics on the workplace, e.g. small businesses, hospitals, and other contexts where robots and humans work side-by-side.
Regulatory and licensing issues raised by robots in the home, the office, in public spaces (e.g. roads), and in specialized environments such as hospitals.
Design of legal rules that will strike the right balance between encouraging innovation and safety, particularly in the context of autonomous robots.
Issues of legal or moral responsibility, e.g. relating to autonomous robots or robots capable of exhibiting emergent behavior.
Issues relating to robotic prosthetics (e.g. access equity issues, liability for actions activated by conscious or unconscious mental commands).
Relevant differences between virtual and physical robots.
Relevant differences between nanobots and larger robots.
Usage of robots in public safety and military contexts.
Privacy issues relating to data collection by robots, either built for that purpose or incidental to other tasks.
Intellectual property challenges relating to robotics as a nascent industry, to works or inventions created by robots, or otherwise peculiar to robotics.
Issues arising from automation of professional tasks such as unauthorized practice of law or medicine.

Anyone with an interest in attending the conference or presenting their own topic for discussion will need to submit all of the appropriate paperwork by January 13.

Oh, and if you do attend the conference, remember to behave appropriately. After all, Skynet is watching.

(via io9)

Showing 4 comments

  1. DarkKnight at 1:59pm 22nd December 2011 Robots have no rights, they're property made of things I bought and put together or that was already put together for me. Can I do that with people or animals? If I throw away my smartphone because I don't like it anymore, does anyone care? Does this mean in the future I could go to prison for discarding my electronics and their man made feelings?
  2. Michael Lane at 6:23pm 22nd December 2011 One word...... Skynet.
  3. David Simmons at 10:19am 22nd December 2011 Since corporations are people, then make the robot a corporation and the argument is settled.
  4. jesterking at 7:31am 22nd December 2011 Robots for the moment are tools. No different than that of a hammer. The problem lies with our definition of life. is consciousness/self aware enough to classify a robot as a living entity? or does it have to occur naturally, in nature? I would tend to say, once it becomes conscious, and self aware, the robot is living. Maybe not on the same level as humanity, but it is still a form of life, regardless.
Close Suggestion Car security: Japanese engineers develop seat that knows who’s sitting on it
View Article