Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

Stephen Hawking says we could destroy the universe

Add as a preferred source on Google

Stephen Hawking is worried that technology and science may be getting out of hand. The noted physicist recently warned that artificial intelligence and aliens pose a serious threat to the human race and planet Earth, but now he’s concerned that the so-called “God particle” or Higgs Boson could become unstable and destroy the entire universe.

Scientists discovered the Higgs Boson during experiments in Switzerland with the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The particle was named after British physicist Peter Higgs, who predicted its existence in 1964. The discovery was key in explaining why objects have mass.

Recommended Videos

Related: Artificial Intelligence could be worse than nukes, says Tesla CEO Elon Musk

Hawking was skeptical of its existence from the start and was disappointed by its discovery, saying that physics is less interesting now. After much thought, Hawking now believes that the God particle is dangerous. He expressed his view in a preface to a new book called “Starmus.”

“The Higgs potential has the worrisome feature that it might become metastable at energies above 100bn gigaelectronvolts (GeV),” he wrote. “This could mean that the universe could undergo catastrophic vacuum decay, with a bubble of the true vacuum expanding at the speed of light. This could happen at any time and we wouldn’t see it coming.”

However, Hawking acknowledged that this catastrophe isn’t likely to happen any time soon. After all, scientists would have to build a particle collider larger than Earth itself to reach 100bn GeV and thereby destroy the universe.

Malarie Gokey
As DT's Mobile Editor, Malarie runs the Mobile and Wearables sections, which cover smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, and…
Amazon is full of copycats and shady brands. This Chrome extension lets you avoid them.
Advertisement, Poster, Text

Shopping on Amazon used to be simple. You searched for a product, compared a few familiar brands, and checked out. These days, it often feels like you're scrolling through an endless parade of names that look like someone leaned on a keyboard before hitting publish. That's exactly the problem Knockoff is trying to solve.

Created by developer Josh Pigford, the Chrome extension doesn't promise to expose counterfeit products or magically tell you what's good. Instead, it tackles something arguably more annoying: the flood of unfamiliar, mass-produced brands that dominate Amazon search results.

Read more
AI agent reportedly carried out an entire ransomware attack on its own
AI didn't just write malware. It apparently clocked in for work.
Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity researchers say they have documented what could be the first ransomware attack carried out almost entirely by an autonomous AI agent, marking a significant shift in how cyberattacks could be conducted in the future. According to cloud security firm Sysdig, they have uncovered a ransomware operation dubbed JadePuffer that appears to have relied on a large language model (LLM) agent to perform nearly every stage of the attack without continuous human intervention.

If confirmed, the incident suggests AI is moving beyond writing malicious code and into actively planning, adapting, and executing cyberattacks in real time.

Read more
The Washington Post predicted how tech will advance 50 years ago and the success rate is humbling
The Washington Post predicted 2026 tech in 1976. It got a lot right.
Representative Image

Fifty years ago, when floppy disks were cutting-edge and the personal computer revolution had barely begun, The Washington Post attempted a remarkably ambitious exercise: predict what life in 2026 would look like. Some of those predictions now read like science fiction. Others feel surprisingly ordinary because they have become part of everyday life.

In a retrospective published for America's 250th anniversary, the newspaper revisited science editor Thomas O'Toole's 1976 article Inventing the Future, comparing its forecasts with today's technological reality. The results reveal that while predicting exact timelines is nearly impossible, identifying long-term scientific trends can be remarkably accurate.

Read more