File this one under “strange, but true — and completely terrifying”: Until 2006, beleaguered imaging company Kodak had a fully functioning nuclear reactor, packed with weapons-grade uranium, in the basement of one of its buildings near Rochester, New York. And according to the Democrat and Chronicle (a local Rochester newspaper), almost nobody in the community knew about it — until now.
The small nuclear reactor was housed in a 14- by 24-foot concrete room, deep beneath the basement-level of Building 82 in Kodak Park, the company’s super-fun-sounding office complex near Greece, NY, in the Rochester area. The relatively small reactor, which Democrat and Chronicle writer Steve Orr describes as resembling “Robby the Robot from a 1950s science fiction movie,” house 3.5 pounds of highly-enriched uranium — the kind terrorists like to get their grubby mitts on.
Now, this isn’t quite as insane as it might first sound. (Ok, it is, but things at least never got out of hand, as they could have.) According to Orr’s report, the reactor never had a chance of exploding, never leaked, and never presented any risk of radiation poisoning for either Kodak employees or the general public.
Of course, the big question is: Why in tarnation did Kodak need a nuclear reactor? For tests — duh! Albert Filo, a former Kodak research scientist, tells Orr that the reactor was used to check certain chemicals for impurity, as well as for tests related to an imaging technique known as “neutron radiography.” Kodak had reportedly used a similar reactor at Cornell University, located in Ithica, NY, but decided in 1974 that it needed its own.
By 2006, however, Kodak apparently figured that it no longer needed its own nuclear reactor, and got the U.S. Federal government to help safely transport the uranium to a secure storage facility in South Carolina.
While that’s all well and good, it begs the question: how many other companies have potential disasters just sitting around in their basements?
(via Gizmodo)
Image via Triff/Shutterstock
sounds legit.
It’s not a potential disaster. It’s a source of energy and/or high-energy particles. This kind of biased reporting is exactly why people have difficulty with understanding, let alone making rational decisions about nuclear power.
Did you read the story? Andrew clearly stated:
“According to Orr’s report, the reactor never had a chance of exploding, never leaked, and never presented any risk of radiation poisoning for either Kodak employees or the general public.”
Sounds like a fair report to me.
You sir, make too much sense! Stop it!
Then why did he end the report with the punch line: “how many other companies have *potential disasters* just sitting around in their basements?”
If something “never had a chance of exploding, never leaked, and never presented any risk of radiation poisoning” then it wouldn’t constitute a potential disaster.
Well, someone could technically make it into a threat right?
“…don’t take away my kodachrome”
No way!
wow thats a bit disturbing lol
3 things:
1. weapons grade Uranium is safe to handle, as long as you don’t ingest it.
2. you should look into the MIT reactor.
3. we are all on a government watch list now, because we read and commented on this article.
-_-
I don’t see why it is being called a potential disaster waiting to happen in the basement. There are hundreds of successful, safe, working nuclear reactors in operation around the world. You can count the number of reactor failures on your fingers since the creation of the devices. Even cars and airplanes don’t have the safety record nuke reactors have.
Did Paul Simon know about this?
so does BD in NJ
Doesn’t everybody?