Skip to main content

HBO’s Game of Thrones renewed for second season

HBO is wasting no time in showering its loving affections on its recently debuted freshman drama, Game of Thrones. After a fairly solid debut along with positive critical and audience reviews, the network has given a second season of the show the go ahead.

According to EW the first part of the ten-episode series garnered a 2.2 million share for the first airing, then 1.2 million for the next two re-airings which immediately followed the premiere, for a total of 4.4 million. The pilot episode was also aired three more times on Monday night, but those numbers—as well as the crucial DVR and On Demand viewing numbers—have not been released yet, which bodes well for the series; the debut aired at the same time that the NBA Playoffs were in full swing, which could have slanted the numbers towards later viewings.

While it isn’t quite as impressive as Boardwalk Empire’s record setting first airing which drew in 4.8 million, it did far outpace the premiere of True Blood—now one of HBO’s most popular programs, but one that debuted to a low 1.4 million viewers. Thrones also did well in the UK, where it set a Sky Atlantic record with 750,000, which beat out the previous record holder, Boardwalk Empire.

HBO would have liked the debut to be over 3 million, but the numbers are still solid and praise for the show could help to increase viewer numbers in the coming weeks. The fantasy epic, described as “The Sopranos in Middle Earth,” is expensive to make though–at least by HBO standards–which should alarm any that were fans of the cancelled-to-soon Rome. There are two important differences between Rome and Thrones though.

The first is that Throne has a built-in audience, where Rome did not. Even if the rest of the season is terrible (which it hopefully won’t be…), fans of the books will watch every episode regardless. That also might equate to good home media sales when the first season is collected and sold.

The second factor to consider is that Rome was co-financed by the BBC, which simply could not afford to keep up with the costs of the show. While Game of Thrones is expensive to produce—the first episode reportedly cost between $5-$10 million—the entire season cost between $50-$60 million, according to the Hollywood Reporter, which is nowhere near the $100-$110 million that Rome spent for the first season.

Due to all these factors, HBO has confirmed that Game of Thrones will be renewed for a second season to debut next year. That second season will be based on the second book in George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series, titled A Clash of Kings (which raises the question of whether or not the series will change names). In the meantime, Game of Thrones airs on HBO every Sunday.

Editors' Recommendations

Ryan Fleming
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Fleming is the Gaming and Cinema Editor for Digital Trends. He joined the DT staff in 2009 after spending time covering…
Game of Thrones: the best Jon Snow episodes
Jon Snow beyond the wall in Game of Thrones.

Though we're only two episodes into the new series, HBO's House of the Dragon has so far successfully captured the thrill of week-to-week dark fantasy epics, political drama, and overall excitement for the characters and world of Game of Thrones. A second season was already greenlit less than a week after the series premiere but with the recent bombshell of the Kit Harington/Jon Snow-led sequel series in development, it's worth revisiting the impact of the original show as well as its potential future.

Despite a final season that went off the rails, Jon Snow cemented his status as a pop culture fantasy icon and one of the most compelling characters in Thrones' main cast. As such, he's had a great spotlight in a handful of the series' best episodes.
Cripples, Bastards, and Broken Things (season 1, episode 4)

Read more
Why Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power can’t be a Game of Thrones rip-off
Morfydd Clark in "The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power."

Even before Game of Thrones went off the air, there was rampant and wild speculation about which show might emerge that could replace it. Game of Thrones was, according to some, the end of an era where TV fans would all watch the same show and then spend the following week discussing the latest episode and speculating about what was to come. Recently, House of the Dragon has attempted to prove that Game of Thrones can be an heir to itself, but another show that has also entered the fray hopes to become something of a phenomenon.

Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power has often been described as Amazon's version of Thrones. The company has invested enormous sums of money into the show, and it's set in a similar fantasy universe as Thrones, with flying creatures and human actors wearing bad white wigs. George R.R. Martin, the mind behind Game of Thrones, was a huge J.R. Tolkien fan, and wrote his own fantasy series essentially in response to Tolkien's totemic works. That's part of the reason why, whatever Rings of Power turns out to be, it has to be more than just a riff on Game of Thrones, even though its source material was created long before anybody sat on the Iron Throne.
Lord of the Rings and Game of Thrones are not the same thing

Read more
Can House of the Dragon save the Game of Thrones franchise?
Milly Alcock and Emily Carey in House of the Dragon.

Game of Thrones was a revolution. The show once not-so-eloquently described as "tits and dragons" proved to be so much more, introducing a seemingly never-ending parade of compelling characters likely to die from one episode to the next. High production values and genuinely impressive CGI further contributed to the show skyrocketing into the apex of pop culture, but Thrones' secret weapon was always the writing.

Some battles are won with swords and spears, others with quills and ravens; Thrones knew that. Its action episodes were thrilling and massive -- from Stannis' invasion of King's Landing to the infamous Battle of the Bastards. However, most of the show's most iconic clashes were verbal; think of Littlefinger and Varys' snarky remarks to each other or Cersei and Tyrion's surprisingly honest conversations. Guided by George R. R. Martin's sprawling source material, Game of Thrones was a writer's dream. Enhanced by the delicious readings of a cast of icons at their prime, the dialogue in Westeros was a writer's dream come true. Thrones was the perfect combination of cleverness and wit mixed with political intrigue, high stakes, ambitious world-building, nonstop violence, and yes, "tits and dragons."

Read more