<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MP3 Surround Set for Launch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/gadgets/mp3-surround-set-for-launch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/gadgets/mp3-surround-set-for-launch/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MJD</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/gadgets/mp3-surround-set-for-launch/#comment-50843</link>
		<dc:creator>MJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50843</guid>
		<description>Howdie,&lt;br /&gt;
I have read your text about mp3 surround.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not know if you are aware, but there is an alternative mp3 5.1 format,&lt;br /&gt;
which:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Has much better quality at the same bitrate, and offers lower bitrates,&lt;br /&gt;
2) Is more popular (amongs users),&lt;br /&gt;
3) Is free. And all related transcoding tools are free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please check this out.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aud-x.com&quot; title=&quot;www.aud-x.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.aud-x.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
MJD&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdie,<br />
I have read your text about mp3 surround.</p>
<p>I do not know if you are aware, but there is an alternative mp3 5.1 format,<br />
which:</p>
<p>1) Has much better quality at the same bitrate, and offers lower bitrates,<br />
2) Is more popular (amongs users),<br />
3) Is free. And all related transcoding tools are free.</p>
<p>Please check this out.<br />
 <a href="http://www.aud-x.com" title="www.aud-x.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.aud-x.com</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
MJD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
