Skip to main content

Activision Blizzard may settle with Zampella, West, and the Infinity Ward Employee Group on Thursday afternoon

Image used with permission by copyright holder

With just hours to left before a much delayed pre-trial hearing, there are reports that Vincent Zampella and Jason West, the former heads of Call of Duty creators Infinity Ward, may settle with Activision Blizzard before taking the publisher to court.

The Los Angeles Times reported on Thursday that, following a delay of the hearing on Tuesday, it was delayed a second time on Wednesday morning as representatives of Zampella, West, the Infinity Ward Employee Group, and Activision Blizzard spoke behind closed doors at a Los Angeles Superior Court building trying to reach an agreement that left all parties satisfied if not happy with the results. Activision’s representative, attorney Beth Wilkinson, intimated to Zampella/West’s attorney Bobby Schwartz that decisions were delayed because she was waiting for a decision from Activision’s executives.

Judge Elihu Berle said that the case would remain in recess until 1:30pm PST on Thursday, with the trial set to being on Friday. The recess is presumably intended for a settlement to finally be reached.

West, Zampella, and the Infinity Ward Employee Group is seeking around $2 billion in damages from Activision, including between $75 million and $125 million just in unpaid royalties. Activision paid the Infinity Ward Employee Group, a body of around 40 former employees separate from West and Zampella, $42 million in royalties on May 17. The group’s lawyer Bruce Isaacs called the payment a “cynical attempt to look good before the jury trial.”

Activision should be worried about the case reaching a jury. The Call of Duty series has earned the publisher in excess of $7 billion over the past 9 years. While games in the series made by studio Treyarch like Call of Duty: World at War and Call of Duty: Black Ops have been record-breaking sellers for Activison, it was the Infinity Ward games Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 that made the series a worldwide phenomenon. It was royalties from Modern Warfare 2 in particular that fueled the legal arguments between Infinity Ward and Activision that led to the duo’s dismissal from the company in 2010 and the founding of new studio Respawn later that year.

While Activision will be showing off its latest game in the series, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, at the E3 conference next week, Respawn is remaining tight-lipped about its first project for publisher Electronic Arts.

Editors' Recommendations

Anthony John Agnello
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Anthony John Agnello is a writer living in New York. He works as the Community Manager of Joystiq.com and his writing has…
The Nintendo Switch just got 2 surprise games — and they’re both worth grabbing
A teddy beat sits on an embroidery hoop in Stitch.

If you were unable to catch this week's Nintendo IndieWorld showcase, then you missed a surprisingly loaded show. Lorelei and the Laser Eyes got a May release date, WayForward showed off its Yars' Revenge revival, and Steamworld Heist 2 got an exciting reveal. In the midst of all those headlines, two smaller games were surprise released on the platform: Stitch and Sticky Business. Don't sleep on either of them, as they're both worth a purchase.

Both games are ports of previously released games, but both went a bit under the radar upon their original launch. Sticky Business modestly launched last summer on PC, whereas Stitch has actually been around since 2022 as an Apple Arcade exclusive. The latter even has an Apple Vision Pro version now that can be played in mixed reality. I can't blame anyone for missing either, but their Switch releases offer a good opportunity to catch up with some quiet hidden gems.

Read more
Is this Razer’s Steam Deck killer?
The Razer Kishi Ultra sitting on a table.

Razer has been oddly quiet in the burgeoning world of handheld gaming PCs. When I met up with the company at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) to learn about its new products, I was happy to hear it had an answer to the success of the Steam Deck.

But it was not the type of answer I was expecting.

Read more
The best iPhone emulators
A collage of the delta emulator.

The market for iPhone games has become so wide and diverse that it can realistically compete with most console and PC offerings. Where we once only got cheap time-wasters, we now have complete experiences that don't feel any less impressive than what the competition offers. In fact, a lot of games made for consoles are appearing on the iPhone now that it is becoming so powerful. However, older games have paradoxically been mostly absent from the app store. That all could be about to change as emulation is now allowed on iPhone, though with some caveats that any retro fan should know about before getting too excited to play all your favorite NES games on your phone. Here's what's up with iPhone emulators, as well as our picks for a few of the best ones you can get right now.
What you need to know about emulation on iPhone
Emulators on iPhone, as well as emulation in general, are in a strange legal gray zone. Previously, the only way to get an emulator on your iPhone was through some workarounds that generally involved jailbreaking your phone, That differs from Android, which has enjoyed native emulators for years. In 2024, Apple updated its App Store guidelines to allow for emulators on its store, but with some important restrictions.

Here's the exact wording: "Apps may offer certain software that is not embedded in the binary, specifically HTML5 mini apps and mini games, streaming games, chatbots, and plug-ins. Additionally, retro game console emulator apps can offer to download games. You are responsible for all such software offered in your app, including ensuring that such software complies with these guidelines and all applicable laws. Software that does not comply with one or more guidelines will lead to the rejection of your app. You must also ensure that the software adheres to the additional rules that follow in 4.7.1 and 4.7.5. These additional rules are important to preserve the experience that App Store customers expect, and to help ensure user safety."

Read more