Modifying Xbox

In a landmark case, one gamer is being taken to court for installing chips in Xbox consoles enabling users to play illegally obtained games.

In the first trial of its kind, Matthew Crippen, 28, is being taken to court today for modifying Xbox 360s. Crippen was arrested in August 2009 after he was paid to install chips in consoles in order for users to play pirated games.

An undercover agent approached Crippen and offered $80 for the service, and recorded a conversation in which Crippen admitted to modifying three Xbox 360s a week. According to the prosecution, Crippen was running a small business with this operation. He was arrested and released on $5,000 bond. If convicted, Crippen faces a maximum of three years in prison for violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

As the trial starts, Crippen’s defense is already weakening. Last week, a judge declared his team cannot argue “fair use.” The judge determined that “fair use” doesn’t apply seeing as the DMCA makes no mention of it. Crippen’s attorneys wanted to compare modifying a console to jailbreaking an iPhone, which fair use advocates argue have become more similar devices.

And as things couldn’t get worse for Crippen, there’s the possibility that video evidence of Crippen allegedly in the process of modifying a console will be used against him. In his corner, however, is infamous hardware-hacker Andrew “Bunnie” Huang, who (if permitted) will defend Crippen. Huang contends that Crippen’s modification methods did not technically violate the DMCA. However, the federal government does not plan to take Huang’s testimony into account.

What adds an air of controversy to the debacle is the stance Microsoft has recently taken on hacking regarding its new Kinect. A year ago, Microsoft put modifiers on blast, and began banning worked-on machines from Xbox Live. And when a similar situation arose after Kinect’s release, the company initially threatened legal action against users who tampered with the device’s hardware. However, after the “hacks” become more and more innovative and were largely praised by media outlets as revolutionary, Microsoft suddenly changed its tone. Microsoft argues it left the Kinect open source for the very purpose of modifying the device, which strangely contradicts the company’s original accusations — as well as everything else it’s ever said about modification.

Whatever the company’s true feelings on the subject, Crippen is facing extremely dire consequences for his own actions. Something gamers everywhere would be wise to take heed of.

Showing 243 comments

  1. andya at 5:28pm 31st December 2010 hes not stealing hes enabling others to steal...which im not so sure is a crime..if i was on jury id say not guilty what people dont understand is that people like him is what brings innovation and forcing technology forward, think about it folks if you had standard definition tv and some dude said hey put this in your tv and youll have high def everybody except the idiots would be all over it, now as far as kinect its microsofts choice to leave it open source, it is theres they can do whatever they want with it, afterall there getting free ideas from all these tech schools
  2. the doctor at 2:57pm 31st December 2010 I wonder if his modifications can be construed as protecting against the red ring of death? Its not like microsoft expects or needs to win, they just need to suck all the money from someone to serve as an example, and spurious lawsuits do that well.
  3. Dirty Doggg at 9:32am 31st December 2010 If you buy something it's yours and you should be able to do what you want with it (or pay someone else to do something with it) so long as what you do doesn't interfere with or harm others. Companies do not have an absolute right to profit from derivative products or services made unnecessary or more economical by the innovation of others. Can you imagine if car manufacturers were able to make it illegal for a non-dealer mechanic to repair your car or for third-party manufacturers to make replacement parts? Or if it were illegal to "soup up" your car yourself in your garage? These companies need to start relying on quality and price to compete, not monopoly. Allowing manufacturers to void the warranty for a "hacked" device should be the extent of their recourse.
  4. hyp at 1:40am 31st December 2010 Say no to Microsoft product, Just do`t buy any of Microsoft. Spread this message.
  5. j317 at 2:52pm 30th December 2010 WTF? Why is this on the news when it was from a month ago and the case has been dismissed?
  6. Michael at 2:02pm 30th December 2010 Case dismissed weeks ago.
  7. Spooky at 11:31am 30th December 2010 What a messed up country we live in where you can go to jail for modifying something that you own.
  8. Kweli at 11:18am 30th December 2010 The worlds richest man want to send someone to jail for making $180 a week.
    1. Kweliisclueless at 5:25pm 30th December 2010 Nothing to do with MS and everything to do with the Feds.
  9. jun at 6:31pm 29th December 2010 Is it breaking the law if I bought a gadget and modify it to satisfy my ambition/curiosity? where in the world is justice in this action/adventure to tweak my piece of electronic device..........?
  10. TripMoon at 3:19pm 29th December 2010 So if I modify my DVD player to play all region codes, I am breaking the law?
    1. bill at 5:57pm 29th December 2010 Yes and the federal govmnt will arrest you and take your life away.
  11. BDubya at 1:09pm 29th December 2010 Ridiculous... If I buy are car that runs on gas but mod it to work with chicken turds, I'm breaking the law?
    1. bill at 5:56pm 29th December 2010 Yes and the federal govmnt will arrest you and take your life away.
  12. Jeremy_hacks at 8:45am 29th December 2010 The thing that bothers me the most about this, is the fact that this guy broke absolutely NO laws. He provided no illegal copies of games, it doesn't seem that he told anyone to do such. The fact remains that even owning back ups is NOT illegal. Backups protect my investment in the 60 dollar game i just purchased. As long as i don start burning and selling copies, i.e. its for my own personal use, then no copyright laws have been infringed upon. This is just another case of the government protecting the so-called rights of massive corporations, instead of protecting their citizens instead. It seems that we must not give enough campaign contributions to warrant that level of protection from our own government.
  13. jwill at 2:57pm 28th December 2010 I can't believe they went under cover to expose a guy for soldering chips into a computer system. It might be a 'console', but it is still a computer. That undercover guy could have probably walked down the road a bit and bought crack from a random drug dealer and actually busted someone commiting a crime. Is the crime rate that low there? Heck, come on down here, u could bust a drug dealer a day and still work until retirement. Guess then there wouldn't be a big corp like microsoft doing the legal research and work and screwing over it's target market. Tax dollars well spent there.
  14. George at 11:00am 28th December 2010 Okay, that seals it. I will never purchase another Microsoft product again. Ever.
    1. georgeisasucker at 5:17pm 30th December 2010 Of course you will. You know it, we know it, and Bill knows it.
  15. Matt Sobel IMDB at 10:30am 28th December 2010 elect me and set you free. ignore this crap.... the law is meant to protect you bustin your nose.... not to protect stupid companies who can't protect their work.
  16. Kyle at 10:05am 28th December 2010 It is not illegal to modify an xbox 360 but i do see how it can be illegal to offer it for sale. However if he did not offer any games with the modification i do not see how they have a case against him. If the man had any pirated software he would be screwed but if he had freeware xbox games that someone made and offererd for download it would help him a lot. He could basically say he was offering the service for freeware downloads. I think he will win this case either way.
  17. Guest at 10:13pm 27th December 2010 Do Not buy Microsoft products! Microsoft is an extremely unethical company - and they will do anything to get ahead. That is not something to be admired, and not something to be taken lightly. As far as Operating Systems - there are better choices - one of which is Ubuntu. As far as Gaming systems go - well, do the right thing and avoid Microsoft.
  18. WolfMan at 8:15pm 27th December 2010 OK this is STUPID. So next time I install a Turbo on a car that was not equipped with it then I could go to jail if I admit it is might be used to racing ? or street racing ? if there is a market for something there will be supply. Modifying a Hardware is NOT illegal. if I modify my car to make it an illegal substance transporter will I be facing charges from car manufacturers by modifying the car ? The software - the illegal software - maker should be facing charges not the guy who modified the console. Same thing with cars. If I put a supercharger on a mustang and the kid will win an illegal street race then I will be held responsible for that ? WTF ? This country is getting more fooked up every day. Freedom ? What freedom ? You can get more freedom in eastern Europe then here...
  19. reaper0414 at 9:07pm 26th December 2010 to Kevin, I have modified a few 360's myself....i cannot say what others intent with the systems are, but for my personal systems i modified them to play homebrew games, and to play legitimate backups of games that I have purchased.As far as i know, i can make a copy of any cd, dvd, or game that I own, so long as i dont give them away or sell them. when i buy a game i copy it, play it, and put the original on my shelf for safe keeping.
  20. BlueStateSwimmer at 6:05pm 26th December 2010 He may not have been selling pirated games, but he is installing the technology for people to use games illegally and there is no other purpose to having a moded x-box other than to do something illegal. In the same way, a marijuana dealer may never smoke themselves, but they are the distributer of the contriban. They could even be put in jail without ever having touched or been in the same room as pot before by orcistrating the transaction between a distributer and a user at some agreed upon place, but that alone is enough to land somebody in jail.
    1. Walt at 8:47am 27th December 2010 You misunderstand the law. Marijuana is a Schedule 1 drug that is illegal to grow, possess, sell, or conspire to grow, possess, or sell. The DMCA does not make it illegal to modify an Xbox. In the case of an Xbox, the DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent the DRM software of the games, not the hardware. Though it seems obvious what the intent of the user/hacker may be when they modify and Xbox, the law is still the law. Intent, in this case, is not illegal. It is good to live in this country.
  21. gummyballz at 11:43am 25th December 2010 What a joke, Once again Microsoft is trying to bully us into doing what they want. If i spend my hard earned money and want to take apart my property and modify it, I can and will. You cant tell me what I can and cant do with MY PROTPERTY.... if this is the case then Microsoft should rent the consoles instead of selling them. I didnt sign a contract when I purchased my hardwre that said I couldnt mod it. Matthew Crippen I am so sorry you have to dealwith this bullshit, I pray for your win over this evil giant. Stand strong and know that you are a trail blazer and me and my peeps ssupport you..... God Speed
  22. dccapoiera at 11:29pm 23rd December 2010 if it's your machine, you should be able to do what you want with it.
  23. Rick Springfield at 4:58pm 23rd December 2010 I buy computers and add memory, install new devices, upgrade the CPU, add hard drives, improve performance with higher efficient cooling devices, and just about everything else you can possibly do to a computer. I didn't know I was breaking federal law.
  24. Devils Advocate at 1:47am 23rd December 2010 One missing element in the defense of such a case is that the prosecution MUST prove not only that a modification was made to circumvent the DRM, but ALSO that the modification made to circumvent the DRM was made for the purpose of COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. Such a claim would require specific evidence, and not a broad generalization of a modification having the 'potential' to violate copyright by circumventing the DRM. Ergo, a simple argument could be made that the modder intended to play 'copies' of his own legally purchased games on the system, since it is not illegal to make a backup copy of legally obtained software for personal use.
    1. whew at 11:20pm 29th December 2010 Thanks for adding some sanity to this thread. I fear it will WHOOSH by most who read it though.
  25. James at 3:46pm 22nd December 2010 My question is....If I buy a new car and it is able to reach speeds greater than the maximum speed limit, is the dealership legally responsible for that transaction? Should the salesman be hauled into court as that vehilcle was intentionally designed to break the law? What about after market mods for the vehicle to increase it's horsepower and top end speed? This whole argument is stupid and makes me sick to see how far our legal system has gone.
  26. Walt at 9:12am 22nd December 2010 Molly, have you ever heard of unbiased reporting?? Did you get a free Xbox for this article?? Why did you not follow up on your story and report the outcome?? Regardless of the DMCA, one of the beautiful aspects of living in this country is that it is still unlawful for the police to use entrapment to arrest a dangerous criminal that is putting the public safety at risk with these modded Xbox consoles.
    1. HorrifiedTaxpayer at 11:18pm 29th December 2010 citation please... I've heard many people say it is unlawful for the police to use entrapment, but I haven't seen any references. They do it all the time, we pay the tax and the victim does the time.
  27. Walt at 9:11am 22nd December 2010 Hell, they are illegal for use in vehicles in Virginia, D.C., and military bases. Unless the government believes people are purchasing the units for installation on the child's skateboard, doesn't it follow that the manufacturer is producing and selling an illegal device? Can a military court go after the manufacturer for producing an illegal device utilized for illegal purposes on a federal installation? Maybe they can invoke the Patriot Act and really go after these rogue radar detector manufacturers and marketers. Radar Detector manufacturers may be facing extremely dire consequences for their own actions. Something their employees everywhere would be wise to take heed of.
  28. Walt at 9:11am 22nd December 2010 Does this mean that employees of a company that produces, markets, and sells Radar Detectors can be arrested and jailed for acts by owners of their device that operate their vehicle in such a way as to endanger the public safety or cause injury???? A radar detector has no legitimate use except to alert a motorist who is exceeding the speed limit that law enforcement is operating radar in the area and attempting to cite or arrest them for violation of the law. Should these company employees be arrested for obstruction of justice or various conspiracy laws? Can they be sued in civil court if a motorist is using their product when causing an injury of fatality?
    1. physicist at 11:16pm 29th December 2010 how did you decide that is the only "legitimate" use for a radar detector? What if somebody is just plain old curious to observe the environment in different spectra?
  29. Guest at 7:40am 22nd December 2010 I have to say thank you all. You have just killed 68 minutes of work time for me, and I love it! Oh and I do think its wrong to install mods that allow people to steal software. Do it at your own risk. (Remember if you get caught your not trying hard enough.)
  30. Dirk Diggler at 5:59pm 21st December 2010 These modders are stealing Billions from the gaming industry and are ruining the business. Let this kid rot in jail for a couple decades. Soon there will be no consoles and everything will be web based--------meaning inferior games which will set back the gaming industry for years!! Do the crime, pay the time
    1. Jon at 5:09am 26th December 2010 Really? Billions? So, then Black Ops, which made over a billion dollars in it's FIRST SIX WEEKS, was losing out on huge profits because of all that piracy, right?
  31. antiusa at 4:35pm 15th December 2010 Yes because crime in America is so low they need to go after nerds..F**** lame
  32. Lawyer Bob at 2:22pm 15th December 2010 And that leads me to my final comment. As an opponent of the DMCA, I am appalled by the sheer folly that is rife in the tripe typed above. It is folly to ignore it or dismiss the DMCA just because one does not agree with it. It is folly to claim charges were not brought under any specific law when such a statement is in plain ignorance of the facts of the case. It is folly to misunderstand why the case was dismissed -- it was not dismissed because no crime was committed under the DMCA; it was dismissed because the misconduct of the investigation and because the prosecution could not prove the elements of the crime. It is folly to not educate the misinformed who believe this was a case of a company trying to control their product – this is much more pernicious than Microsoft’s control fetish. It is folly to blather on about modding when modding is not the issue – copyright protection gone wild is the issue! The DMCA is bad law, and it should be fought, but it should be fought for the evils it actually perpetrates, not because of the paranoia of the ignorant.
    1. Ceeples my neeples at 4:50pm 15th December 2010 Like to hear yourself talk?
    2. Really Bob? at 10:00pm 23rd December 2010 Lawyer Bob, I assume you are a prosecutor because I sincerely pray for anyone that has the misfortune of you defending them, or should I say throwing them to the wolves. Civil disobedience and jury nullification are essential for liberties and freedom with the US justice system. Since they are not practiced much anymore and Lawyer Bob's ignore them, we are witnessing a massive usurpation of power by the government/ corporations as they push of into modern slavery.
    3. Newyorker at 8:18am 28th December 2010 Your post is sheer folly.
  33. Lawyer Bob at 2:22pm 15th December 2010 While I disagree vehemently with the DMCA (which is horrible law, through and through), it is clear that the behavior engaged in by the defendant was in contravention of the Act. Whether the defendant’s actions were “willful” or not (which was a major issue in the case) is the much more interesting issue. As an attorney who has a modicum of knowledge of copyright law, any infringement of copyright or violation of the DMCA on my part is likely willful; however, for lay person, it can be very difficult for prosecutors to show that a violation is willful. in the copyright context, willful means (in most case) that the defendant knew he/she was infringing or violating the DMCA. Here, the prosecution tried to sidestep having to prove willfulness through crafting proposed jury instructions that left out the need for the finding of willfulness, and the judge properly chastised them for it. The prosecution dropped the case because they could not prove willfulness (and because some key evidence was excluded for investigatory misconduct under CA privacy laws).
  34. Lawyer Bob at 2:20pm 15th December 2010 Simply modifying a console to circumvent copyright protection implementation is not criminal, although civil penalties may adhere. Further, if the modification is not design to circumvent copyright protection, then it is not unlawful under the DMCA. Thus, the hysterical overreactions evidenced in this thread are unwarranted and counterproductive. To just address a representative handful of the plethora of hand wringing above, the DMCA would not prevent moving the internals of a console to another case; adding more storage/memory to a console; overclocking the processor of a computer; modifying any device, machine or appliance that does not use copyrighted media (such as a internal combustion engine); etc. Such hysteria among otherwise savvy folks is disheartening, to say the least.
    1. jwill at 3:11pm 28th December 2010 If u don't think there are copyrights or patents on vehicles, motors, appliances, etc, then u sir, are an imbucile that googled the law and copy/pasted it into a forum. Either that or u are an even bigger imbucile of a lawyer. But , still, why did u spend all that time on it if you ARE a lawyer. Come on, that's like a thosand dollars worth of work u could have been applying to your clients' cases, Jack-wagon.
  35. Lawyer Bob at 2:20pm 15th December 2010 Such actions are not criminal unless the violation of the DMCA is “willful” and is accomplished for a commercial purpose: 17 U.S.C. Sec. 1204 (a) provides that "In General.— Any person who violates section 1201 or 1202 willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain— (1) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, for the first offense...."
  36. Lawyer Bob at 2:18pm 15th December 2010 The DMCA (the specific law under which the defendant was charged) renders unlawful modifications that allow the circumvention of copyright protection technology: 17 U.S.C. Sec. 1201 (a)(2) "No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that— (C)is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person’s knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title."
    1. TwoWords at 11:12pm 29th December 2010 LawyerBob, there are 2 key words in that quote: "a work" which implies access to something copyrighted. This person did not provide access to anything copyrighted. They circumvented a technical measure that controls access to the HARDWARE, so they can run arbitrary code on the computer. They did not circumvent access to any copyrighted material.
  37. Cwd at 1:16pm 15th December 2010 Why don't the same DMCA laws that Crippen is being charged for violating apply to the government? Are they above the laws they impose upon the people who pay to keep them employed?
    1. answer at 5:01pm 30th December 2010 Yes, they are. You need the government's permission to sue the government. Sucks the big one.
  38. von Winskinheimer at 8:58am 15th December 2010 Those of you that think that he's not breaking a law are wrong. The DMCA specifically prohibits you from creating or modifying hardware to bypass copyright encryption. Now, before you get on my a$$ for saying this, I think that the DMCA is bad legislation, as it appears to have a "guilty until proven innocent" approach. Read up on the DMCA before you ignorantly comment, please.
    1. guest at 10:25am 22nd December 2010 What gamer reads up on any DMCA. If I was able and going to mod a 360 the last thing I would expect would be to go to court, they need to pull this information out of the fine pr int and let people know whats coming.
    2. USA=Domesticated at 9:55pm 23rd December 2010 Look up Jury Nullification. Simply breaking a "law" means nothing, or at least it shouldn't. A jury of informed peers should return a "not guilty" verdict and set some case precedence. It's almost unfortunate the case got dropped because they can come back again and again. Juries determine all fact and law during a trial. The law is just as equally on trial as the defendant. Most people do not realize that and many judges refuse to deliver jury requested information. That is just a small part of why America is a total joke and is rapidly becoming a banana republic.
    3. winskinheimerjoke at 4:54pm 30th December 2010 Too bad you don't follow your own advice. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove WHAT WAS THE INTENT of the modifications, and that's damned near impossible. There are countless other reasons to modify the hardware, the most glaringly obvious being to allow an owner to run software they themselves have written. And that's exactly WHY this case was thrown out of court. The clueless one here is you.
  39. JRDooooog at 8:38am 15th December 2010 This is a joke! My friends and I have been modifying consoles for years. No one has ever been able to detect these mods because we keep quiet about them, but we make very good money by doing this. I think Microsoft, etc. should hire some smarter engineers if they want their games and consoles to be hack proof.
    1. notgenius at 11:05pm 29th December 2010 I call BS. No one has ever been able to detect the mods??? What the heck are you trying to say? That you surprise your customer by installing the mods without them knowing? That the modification has no effect so therefore cannot be detected? You are a moron if you think that "smarter engineers" means modification will be impossible. Really smart engineers will make a product which is MORE modifiable.
  40. NKe at 6:34am 15th December 2010 Hey, just another reason that makes America a laughing stock to the rest of the world...go Wikileaks.
  41. Freddy at 5:07am 15th December 2010 Wow, I guess we now know who has the ower today. When the computer and music industry copyright and license lawyers can get you a stiffer sentence than Pimping or Dealing, something is wrong.
    1. Rock at 7:13pm 27th December 2010 Actually the computer and music industries are well able to provide access to both for any politicians willing to sign on the line. Why else would anyone sign away a basic right, that of property ownership. A tax on the amount of oxygen you breath is coming -- just wait.
  42. JDSteon at 11:10pm 14th December 2010 If someone asks me to hot rod their car and they then use it to escape after committing a bank robbery, that's not my problem. Same with this. Lame-ass federal govt charges on behalf of a company that is already richer than God. Get over it MS. You lose. Epic fail for you, and your minion Molly.
  43. oldradiojock at 10:41pm 14th December 2010 Many postings mention the waste of Law Enforcement resources for this witch-hunt, dreamed up to bully the,'Little guy." Where were these diligent, watchdogs, as Bernie Madoff stole $65 Billion ? How about the 100s of $Billions that the Enron creeps stole from the savings & retirements of hard-working people? What of when $Trillions were flushed down the toilet, by Wall-street experimenters, who broke multitudes of laws & damned-near crashed the World economy? Instead ; FBI,CIA, State,Interpol,G20 & G8 powers are directed toward demonizing people, "building Hot Rods. " ( & feeling people up, at Airports) Imagine, if Ford, Chevrolet,Chrysler had treated Hot Rodders with the same disdain & contempt. The "Big 3," would have evaporated into history, before the Mustang, Camaro or Charger became clay models. One glaring difference between this X-box saga & the Big 3, is that the fine-print that the automobile companies have on their contracts, tries to shift as much liability onto the Customer, to absolve the Auto Company of any liability & blame. If you put a different engine/tranny in your new car, the Warranty will be voided. However, your car manufacturer, (with Law Enforcement agencies & a murder of Lawyers alongside) is not going to descend upon your domicile and threaten you with Imprisonment or Civil action. Computor/Gaming/Electronics firms don't seem to see it the same way. Instead, their contracts try to cut the individual customer away from the pack, to bully, instill fear & prosecute them, if the buyer dare open the "Magic Box" & alter things. Customers, used to OWN the hardware & software that OUR money paid for. Now, we pay to be their guardians, the contract conditions changing at the whim of the corporate arses. They blame everything on a, "glitch."( which they are not liable for, of course) They can also de-activate OUR property, without notice. Warning! It is written; " When, enough of "wii" become vexed by our "X -es," (X-Boxes) all BMWs, will turn into Ford Pintos." ps. Stop your blubbering & grasping for Case Law. Grab a Dictionary & lookup, "sarcasm." Then, read, " The Golden Rule."
  44. Wan Kerr at 9:56pm 14th December 2010 I agree..smash the state, kiddies!
  45. Mel at 5:26pm 13th December 2010 We have people being raped and murdered every day and they are wasting time and taxpayers' dollars on THIS?!
    1. JD Steaon at 11:13pm 14th December 2010 Well murderers and rapists are much harder to catch, haul in, humiliate and imprison. They can wrap up this guy with no threat to themselves or their hair-dos, and get back to donuts and the re-runs of Law and Order.
  46. Angel at 11:06pm 12th December 2010 Molly, update the report. The case was dropped. Stop kissing Microsoft's arse with your Ides of March warning..."Gamers take heed." Molly, "Learn the law before writing articles."
  47. Rick at 12:26pm 12th December 2010 Just get a life people, and stop buying Xbox.
  48. PRIS at 7:37pm 11th December 2010 I AM GLAD THIS CASE WAS DROPPED!!!!! IT WAS SO STUPID!!!!! (TO BRANDON) THE GUY (CRIPPEN) WAS PAID $80 FOR THE SERVICES OF MODDING THE 360'S NOT SELLING THEM FOR THAT PRICE....
  49. AQuatroni at 3:11pm 11th December 2010 More stupidity and time-wasting in our courts. Don't the courts have anything better to do? Try and convict a child molester, maybe? A murderer? Drug dealer? This copyright idiocy is really going too far. We have more laws in this country than in all the others of the world, COMBINED. I think I'm going to move to Australia. Maybe Russia.
    1. War on Drugs = SCAM at 9:48pm 23rd December 2010 Well, if we are going to prosecute drug dealers, shouldn't we also indict the CIA since they bring the drugs into the USA?
    2. defenderOfFreedom at 10:58pm 29th December 2010 I am sick and tired of "drug dealer" being used as an epithet. You are a Puritan, S T F U thank you very much. I live my life in service to others, I have seen the consequences of drug use, I have seen the consequences of drug prohibition, and I have seen the consequences of incarceration. I insist, as someone FAR wiser than you, that you refrain from branding those DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM who allow those of us who wisely use various illegal substances for the benefit of ourselves and all of our relations as people who should be deprived of basic human rights. You really really need to understand that "drug dealers" are not your enemy, very far from it. Your quality of life is far likelier to be harmed by a well meaning cop who is required to harvest you for revenue, than a vendor of a product which you are apparently not interested in.
  50. Jeff at 2:57pm 11th December 2010 So if I modify my car to run on veggie oil will I be dragged to court by the auto manufacturer? Clearly my car was designed to use only gasoline.
  51. jjjjjj at 3:17am 11th December 2010 dont the cops have more pressing matters to tend with than some douchebag gamer???
    1. !!! at 3:52pm 30th December 2010 only when the "fresh" light comes on at Krispy Kreme
  52. David in Tampa at 11:30pm 10th December 2010 Microsoft; If ya don't want your products tampered with......... encapsulate the circuit boards! Wow that was easy!
    1. davidsamoron at 3:51pm 30th December 2010 Sure, so then the hackers tack on another $100 for having to chisel through the encapsulation. Next!
  53. Guest at 10:35am 10th December 2010 Should distributing legally acquired knowledge which has no legal use be punishable? What about a novel in which the writer explains in detail how his character fabricates a bomb, or seduces a minor, or becomes a terrorist? What about a person assisting those who want to die... if he set up the apparatus but required the client to self-administer the poison should he be punished? Should it be legal to set up stings in which an otherwise innocent person has not actually yet committed the crime but shows a willingness to do so (prostitution, terrorist act, etc)? If you aimed a gun and pulled the trigger but it misfired...should you be charged with murder? Personally, I see a distinction between posting instructions in how to modify your X-Box as opposed to running a service of modification to the public. No doubt that we all differ at where we would draw the line. Society gives "lawmakers" the right to define right from wrong in laws..What really bothers me is where highly paid lawyers of commercial firms (or other special-interest groups) lobby and/ or donate to political campaigns in the interest of support for laws which are not in the public interest. I just finished reading a book about resistance in Hitler's Germany. The Gestapo was just following the laws and "rules" of the Third Reich...
  54. I know it sucks... at 9:31pm 9th December 2010 For all of you who think it's legally okay to mod an Xbox, go read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_C.... DMCA, whether you agree with it or not, is very broad. It "criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures (commonly known as digital rights management or DRM) that control access to copyrighted works. It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself." So, throw a chip in anything, even if you own it, that disables copyright protection and you have broken the law. Period.
    1. Ankhorite at 10:37pm 21st December 2010 The DMCA itself needs a lot of modding, eh? Thanks for actually looking up what the DCMA says, and posting a link to it here, instead of all the speculative remarks here.
    2. Rock at 7:10pm 27th December 2010 The law has yet to be tested. A law is just words until tested.
    3. stupidisasstupiddoes at 3:42pm 30th December 2010 An access control is not circumvented, UNTIL and UNLESS the security is actually breached. And, exactly as it says in the part you quoted, there must be the INTENT to circumvent...which is impossible to prove unless caught in the act of actually circumventing it.
  55. Guest at 6:12pm 9th December 2010 This is old news. The lawsuit was dropped almost immediately.
    1. YoMommasBackDoorMan at 3:11am 13th December 2010 Your Mother is old news didn't anyone tell you?
    2. Jonathan at 5:22pm 30th December 2010 Link, source? Thanks.
  56. Derek at 9:25am 9th December 2010 Since when did it become illegal to modify something that you OWN?!? I bought a game console for $400, why can't I modify it any way I desire, after all, its mine correct? This is stupid.
  57. wabi at 2:30pm 8th December 2010 WHERE IS THE CONTRACT? The only way I can see to enforce these types of "restrictions", would be if BOTH the user/consumer and the proprietor SIGN a contract limiting the actions of the user with respect to the trade secrets. Another word for "ANTI-PIRACY LAW" is "CORPORATE POLICE STATE."
  58. Roger Jollie at 1:30pm 8th December 2010 The case against Crippen was dropped due to "Prosecution Errors". At least two of the four prosecution witnesses committed crimes in gathering evidence for the case. One (a Microsoft security expert) admitted to being a modder himself. http://paidcontent.org/article/419-governments-fi...
  59. guest at 10:40am 8th December 2010 Big business is always trying for monopoly. Right now auto companies are trying to get laws passed so aftermarket companies cannot make after market parts and further to make after market parts a violation of warrantees. It won't be long before congress passes a law to protect them against competition.
  60. Mark at 10:27am 8th December 2010 What's the difference in this guy and what the Gov't does when they buy 300 PS3's for the graphics processors? They buy the unit and exploit it's core function for their own purposes. They didn't pay millions to develop a graphics processor. They probably reverse engineer it and manufacture their own chips and take the OEM completely out of the loop.
  61. LFB at 6:00am 8th December 2010 This is why it pays to learn the law, even the basics of ALL court cases. If this "Defendant" files a counterclaim against the federal government and all personal prosecutors named on the original claim for damages as a result of public humiliation (Defamation of Character), Unlawful imprisonment and pain and suffering, I guarantee they will immediately try to bargain with him to drop the charges and take a "Plea" bargain. This is UTTER NONSENSE! As a poster said earlier, "Should the car companies be imprisoned for making cars that can go beyond the speed limits?" and the answer is HELL NO! The purchase of anything, in full, means that you are the sole owner of the product. If someone modifies a car to make it faster, look better, or even degrade the original look and feel of the car, it is not considered copyright infringement or patent infringement, even if that person modifies a bunch of cars and sells them or charges for the service. Because he is NOT telling you to go drive 90 miles per hour. The same goes for game consoles. If you are NOT selling pirated software, the only way to play or test 3rd party software or "Homebrew" software is to modify the console to run "unsigned" code or to disable a "security feature". One day they will mess with the wrong one and find their arrogant @sses in federal prison themselves for proporting and conspiring false claims and charges, as well as wasting the court's time with this BS! Peace Out!
    1. money game at 3:38pm 30th December 2010 Obviously you are clueless. In this country, we have the best judges money can buy. The law is secondary to how much you can afford to bribe the judge.
  62. OGO at 5:27am 8th December 2010 What pejorative, and biased reportage. Instead they could have just said, "Hey kids, this is Microsoft's lawyers, we paid this report monkey some money to say "We're watching you, don't try this or you'll be next."" Further no mention is made of contacting Crippen (or his lawyer) for a statement. This is not news, this is paid PR.
  63. guest at 12:43am 8th December 2010 Ah ha..... Sanity for the win! I see (with further reading and web searching) that the judge spent over 30 minutes chewing out the prosecution as idiots and soon after that he dismissed the case. Tough luck M$
  64. guest at 12:13am 8th December 2010 So by this legal theory, every auto mechanics shop in the country that installs after-market parts is doing something illegal? That's simply absurd.
    1. Ozmrph at 3:04am 28th December 2010 I love your logic. Micromush, why don't you listen to a world of sense?????? Buudy mate!ozmrph ya got 'Ossie' logic right there!
  65. John at 8:28pm 7th December 2010 And don't censor my post!
  66. FRANK at 5:36pm 7th December 2010 PIRATING?:.... I BOUGHT THE ALBUM, THEN THE 8-TRACK, THEN THE TAPE, NOW THE CD THATS SKIPS AND NEEDS REPLACING AGAIN. HOW MANY TIMES IN MY LIFE DO I HAVE TO BUY THE SAME SONGS? I AM FED UP WITH THE WORD "PIRATED". THE PEOPLE CORPORATIONS PUNISH HAVE PROBABLY SPENT HUNDREDS OR EVEN THOUSANDS ON SIMILAR PRODUCTS BUT I GUESS THAT WASN'T ENOUGH.
  67. DGHGH at 5:23pm 7th December 2010 I somewhat agree with telling the super rich and the government to EFFF OFF. A small number of smart underpaid people learning how to save a few bucks has no effect on the wealth of the super rich or the super corporations. What do we pay taxes for? To give money to Illegals immigrants and make the richer even richer " ALL" at the expense of the middle class.
  68. abutterflyloves at 4:25pm 7th December 2010 What did police, and the government do in the 1970s and early 1980s? I AM SO CONFUSED. When does it end? How is sending him to jail going to make our world a better world? Who benefits from taking this pirate type software and hardware criminal off of our streets? And at $80 a Xbox 360, how many did the kid do? I bet court costs, Judge time, court room time, exceeds what this guy made on the side in the name of fun. Most people do things, just to prove they can. And once they can, they are proud they figured it out. Life is too short to have our government bust a 28 yr old kid, while sex offenders walk free, waiting to be caught again. At least when the sex offenders go to jail, we have piece of mind that a criminal is put away. This is prolly a kid that won't even survive in jail.
    1. JustReading at 3:33am 25th December 2010 Kid? I do not think being 28 years old is a kid. If that were the case, could we say a 28 year old who murders someone was just a kid having some fun to show he could do it. I agree totally with those who say everyone is missing the point. The act was illegal, and therefore should be prosecuted. Some ask where does it end. While I do not always agree with an initial case that sets the point for future cases, it has to start somwhere. If it be a case that on its face seemless harmless, so be it. But you have to always look at the bigger picture of where the action can lead. If you don't stop it in its tracks, then when others committ even more damaging crimes, they can get off by going back to how things were done previously and accepted as a norm. That appears to be the case here.
  69. dbdbdb at 12:55pm 7th December 2010 to "some lawyer" Review the licensing agreement jerk the hard ware was sold without warranty for a specific purpose. he did not own the hardware sent to him. He did not violate the license agreement. Further use may result in a crime., but for the same reasons the makers and sellers of controlled chemicals cannot be charged for their manufacutre, the user who puts the illegal drug together or installs the illegal software will be found guilty. If he did not put the pirated games on the system, 9th circuit will find him innocent. hope you are prosecuting him against me.
    1. Will at 10:05pm 9th December 2010 dbdbdb, you're a jerk, a real kneebiter. Have we met?
  70. Brandon at 11:44am 7th December 2010 mods aside, the main issu is that he is SELLING these modded 360's to people for illegal activities. plain and simple. you dont have to agree to the case, but the dude is supporting illegal activity and he is responsible. if you tell a man to kill someone, you still get in trouble even if you didnt pull the trigger. im a gamer myself so its a bit annoying, but we live in a very digital and stubborn culture where doing any media-based illegal activity is praised. eventually all this crap will come back to bte everyone in the ass for supporting this stuff.
    1. anon at 1:03pm 28th December 2010 So the person who sells a gun to a person who ends up using it to commit murder is guilty of murder himself? If an object can be used for more than one purpose, how can a seller be responsible for the purpose a buyer chooses?
    2. brandonthe boob at 3:11pm 30th December 2010 No, they already bought the 360, then took it to him for modification. What they do with it afterwards is on them, and only them. I can modify your car (change the chip) so that it can go over the speed limit. When you actually DO speed in it, the only one that's going to get a ticket for speeding is you.
  71. trim at 9:19am 7th December 2010 Modifying 360's does not hurt Microsoft's wallet. In fact, because they can ban you from Live, it actually increases their sales. Most have 2 consoles now; one to go online with, and one for pirated games. Only thing that can hurt their wallets is game design companies taking their games to other consoles because everyone is now playing the pirated version of the game instead of buying it. If your favorite game jumps to PS3, then you'll get a PS3, and not a new XBOX. However, now with the ability to mod PS3's as well as the Wii, no game design company is safe. They are the only ones supposedly hurting from all of this. Although, when a game sells 7 million copies on its opening day, can't really say you're hurting now can you?
  72. Mike Mozart at 2:39pm 6th December 2010 It's SCARY that our Federal Dollars and Federal Prosecutors are Hauling this Guy into Court to Imprison him. When Sumner Redstone's VIACOM and CBS can Distribute the BULK of all the P2P File Sharing Software from their OWN SERVERS, Promote It's Use for Piracy Purposes with Editorial Reviews and Videos using Copyrighted Songs. CBS/Cnet ACTUALLY Offers AND Promotes a Software download to hide your Digital Online tracks to protect against Copyright Infringement Lawsuits when you are stealing copyrighted Media! They demonstrate using a Lady Gaga Song! CBS/Cnet is Above the Law and the Feds haul in a Kid to Federal Court? http://dancedwiththedevil.blogspot.com/2010/05/cn... It's Sickening! http://DancedWithTheDevil.blogspot.com
  73. Kemps at 11:11am 6th December 2010 I'd like to throw myself on the mercy of this court...I have lived with the shame for long enough and it's time to come clean...approximately 6 months ago I removed the clearly marked "Do Not Remove" tag from my mattress and have been encouraging others to do the same. Such mods cannot be allowed in civilized society. Hopefully the Court with be gracious and allow all the 12-year-olds playing Black Ops online to form my firing squad.
    1. Phil at 12:10pm 6th December 2010 It's not illegal to remove the tag from your mattress... That just applies to the stores.
    2. Min at 1:43am 27th December 2010 BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! That's awesome! At least you can be sure that their aim will be perfect.
  74. R2D2 at 8:10pm 5th December 2010 This crime probably is new here or maybe not , I just never heard anything like this here , but in Mexico city this is been going for a while if you go to the downtown there when you purchase a new sistem PS3, Wii , xbox360 , for no more than $50 dlls you can get this chip installed on the spot plus obtaining pirated games for around 5 bucks , so this does not take me by surprise !!!!!
  75. bob hope at 6:09am 5th December 2010 OMG grow up! open your eyes....and free your selfs. free your minds. free your world, and read "little brother" then maybe you might get it! dont trust any one over 25
    1. PHXBryant at 7:41pm 5th December 2010 Just remember, when some crisis happens, and we feel that our security is at stake, do not freely release control of your liberties, because you think it will be "SAFER." Just remember what the safest place is. A locked prison cell. And bh remember, liberalism is meant to control your decisions by "experts" telling you they know what is best for you, just like DHS in "Little Brother."
    2. Will at 10:00pm 9th December 2010 Bob, what are you going to do in a few years?
    3. Joe at 11:18am 30th December 2010 Really? Wow, yep those 50 year old people are very dangerous! Wow! and 26 Year olds they are evil, the real danger is generalization and not thinking about things. wow!
  76. guest at 9:53pm 4th December 2010 Have you never heard of backing up you own games. Many can not perform this modification and need help to do so. If you don't backup your disks, and you disks become scratched then your out 59.99!
  77. Kevin at 7:53pm 4th December 2010 Man people sure are missing the obvious point here. The modification had one and only one purpose and the purpose was illegal. It is absolutely not the same as modifying your car to get better gas mileage or modifying your microwave to cook faster. etc. etc. If I use this logic, then I can modify my xbox to hack into banks and add money to my account. Then I can sell the hack to other people so they can use their xbox to hack into banks and add money to their account. Sound reasonable? Or how about this... I modify my xbox and turn it into a lethal explosive device. The mod includes mounts that are machined precisely to match specific dimensions of specific armored cars in my area...
    1. PHXBryant at 7:28pm 5th December 2010 Again people like you are ignorant. As I stated earlier there is one very GOOD reason for this modification. Microsoft's Xbox360 are notorious for "TRAY-DROPPING" discs, destroying their value, and usability. So if a manufacture builds a system and overlooks at repairing its flawed design that DESTROYS a permanent licensed component (game disc media) because it forces you to repurchase the product then is this not fraud. This has been a common occurrence since the first 360's hit the shore. If I then modify my 360 in order to use primary copies of my master discs due to an MS design "flaw" I should then be prosecuted as well. That is what you are saying correct. See, your second statement is false. There is, unfortunately to you, more than one reason for this mod as I stated above. As for your other examples I will tell you why they are asinine. No one will buy your mod for stealing funds unless you have already created the code, tested the method, and have in fact stolen the funds. Otherwise you wouldn't waste your time with a procedure that does not produce results, That is assumption one. If you had not stolen the funds to verify that your "mod" works, it would be very difficult to prosecute you for stealing when nothing was stolen. You may be brought up on other charges, like trespassing, but not theft. What this means is that in the acts you claim as examples you have to commit an illegal crime separate of the tools you used. In your statement, "If I use this logic...I modify my xbox and turn it into a lethal explosive device. The mod includes mounts that are machined precisely to match specific dimensions of specific armored cars in my area..." Lets say you want to turn your Xbox into a bomb, you have to acquire or manufacture the explosive device separate of the 360, just turning the 360 into a remote triggering device, even with fancy machined mounts does not make it an IED. It makes it a two-way communications device that is capable of turning off my porch light if I forget. The intent to acquire the chemicals for an explosive device is what would get you jailed under the Patriot Act. In the Feds case, since he wasn't trying to blow anything up, it does not fall under the loose and vague definitions of the Patriot Act. It doesn't matter if it was a gun or a computer, it's still the same. In the Xbox case it can be shown and proven that no law was broken when modifying the 360 by testing a disc under fair use policy. What the owner does with it is a separate case altogether.
    2. Oneleg at 4:50am 6th December 2010 so modding a Xbox is the same as killing people, I like your thinking...
    3. Timothy at 11:04pm 30th December 2010 This is a stupid response! To sell, create, or make something is not the same as doing a crime with the final product. We do not hold people accountable for murder because they work in a gun factory, yet their guns may be used to kill people. We do not prosecute people for building cars, yet drunks may drive them. We do not send people to jail for making beer, yet minors make consume it. In this case, people own the device and ownership means they should have freedom to do with it what they want. If someone pirates software, then they should have a case. The modification may enable, but it is not "the crime".
  78. Deeper Coscience at 9:57am 4th December 2010 "MIcrosoft argues it left the Kinect open source for the very purpose of modifying the device, which strangely contradicts the company’s original accusations — as well as everything else it’s ever said about modification." Open source my ass, now that the Kinect mods are actually making more money for them end enticing others to buy them it's ok to mod things. I can't believe an undercover federal agent was actually used for this, while hundreds of drug deals are occurring by the minute.
    1. Deeper CoNscience? at 4:45pm 15th December 2010 I can't believe you think drug dealers are a necessary use of our government either. You seemed kind of intelligent at the beginning of your post but really destroyed it quickly.
    2. Ankhorite at 10:32pm 21st December 2010 "I can't believe...." You know what I can't believe? How many rape evidence DNA kits are sitting around UNPROCESSED in every state in the nation, because the states & the feds claim they don't have the money to get the job done. But they have the money for this, and for silly drug busts of pot smokers. Oy.
    3. sensible at 10:44pm 29th December 2010 Why are you concerned about "hundreds of drug deals by the minute"? If you value freedom, grow a pair and defend freedom! We should be free to choose what to eat, drink, install on our computers, smoke, and possess, to the extent that we do so in a civilized manner.
    4. Jonathan at 5:20pm 30th December 2010 BINGO! Waste of taxpayer's money, unless funded by Microsoft or RIAA/MPAA.
  79. jayjay4066 at 5:49pm 3rd December 2010 I don't know much about this sort of thing but does this mean that you can't take apart a game system and make it have a clear casing and like put colored LED's inside like I have seen some do on youtube or other internet video's? I guess that I am obviously not sure if that would be considered tampering.
  80. Dexter at 5:30pm 3rd December 2010 We're arresting people for modding something they own now? He wasn't pirating anything himself, he was just enabling the ability to do so. What happens after it's out of his care is no longer his issue. It's an xbox... This is a slippery slope. If I jailbreak my friends iPhone am I going to go to jail because he *could* pirate apps? We need to stop wasting time on victimless, non-violent crimes. Put that manpower to good use and bust some real criminals. The justice system is meant to protect the values and morals of society. I don't think that is happening in this situation.
  81. xdugef at 5:00pm 3rd December 2010 This is a test case for the future of copy right protection of software.. you don't want this go in favor of microsoft otherwise any computer you buy will be subject to their approval and criminal ramifications if you modify it.
  82. Anthony Martinez at 3:54pm 3rd December 2010 If microsoft wouldn't have made such a crappy system in the first place! Thats why many of microsoft customers are switching to sony for a gaing system, apple for a pc, and linux for an os. They suck!
    1. PHXBryant at 6:38pm 5th December 2010 The only thing they got right was Xbox Live and its the soul reason I have put up with four damn crap-ass consoles until I finally got a good one over the past 4 years.
    2. Sonyblows at 10:06pm 27th December 2010 Learn English moron. Sony is garbage.
    3. AppleHasWorms at 2:19pm 30th December 2010 Another fanboi troll heard from
  83. Arcadian at 3:01pm 3rd December 2010 so i cannot modify my car to get better gas mileage?? i cannot modify my stove to disperse better heating?? i cannot modify my house to get better enegry from it?? I bought it, and i take the risk of damaging it. the court is waaay out of bound here
    1. PHXBryant at 6:36pm 5th December 2010 Not by javascrpt's claims and of course the lawyer speaking below him. You have to have everything you purchase remain how it was in factory form. I guess this means ALL replacement parts not manufactured by the originating company need to be eliminated as well. Actually if the gentleman being prosecuted were to have accepted "DONATIONS" then it would be a little more difficult. I find boarding on entrapment. One hell of a fine line here.
      1. MadDog01 at 8:11pm 5th December 2010 Damn! I better take the coat hanger of my radio... Sony might decide to sue me.
    2. objecttothis at 5:30pm 13th December 2010 Your argument is faulty here. He isn't in trouble for doing the same thing as you would for modifying a car for better mileage. He's in trouble for doing the same thing as turning back an odometer in his car (technically just "modifying". Yes, there are some mods that are illegal even in cars. You also can't install blue flashing lights either if you need another example.
      1. realitycheck at 10:32pm 29th December 2010 turning back the odometer on a car is entirely different and unrelated. Odometer tampering is an act of fraud and is used to misrepresent the condition and value of a vehicle. This guy's modification did not involve deception.
    3. Nico at 5:42am 22nd December 2010 I understand your frustration, and I agree that modifying the system per se should not be considered criminal. But the mod enables the use of pirated games, which means Microsoft will lose revenues as consumers buy illegally manufactured games (more than likely pirated copies of the original games). To use your analogy, it is not illegal to modify your car engine, unless the mod requires the use of Plutonium as an efficient fuel substitute. Then you'll have the EPA, the NSA, and your neighborhood association breathing down your neck. Cheers!
      1. Jon at 4:42am 26th December 2010 What you fail to take into account is what exactly this mod does. Most modifications 'main' purpose is homebrew, IE, so you can write your own software to run on the system. Unfortunately, a 'protected' xbox won't run homebrew, so modifying it to allow it to run unsigned code may allow for pirated games, but it also allows for homebrew games. Again, people are purchasing these pieces of hardware, and then the manufacturers are insisting on maintaining control of the devices they sold. This is unacceptable.
        1. Specs at 9:10pm 27th December 2010 may allow for pirated games? Uh..yea...it allows you to obtain games and play them without paying for them...what other reason is there?
          1. simpleton at 10:36pm 29th December 2010 the other reason is in the post you responded to but apparently did not read: to be able to execute your own code on the machine you bought. I write code, and I like to be able to deploy software I have written on computers I have purchased. This is what the modification permits. It allows you to run any software you like on the machine. It is up to you to decide if you want to commit a crime by obtaining software illegally.
          2. NewSpecs at 2:18pm 30th December 2010 It also allows me to try out games I've written myself.
    4. Specs at 9:07pm 27th December 2010 The Xbox360 wasn't modified to be more efficient...it was modified so he and others could play pirated Xbox360 games on it WITHOUT paying for the games. The only way this guy might get out of it...is that the method used to 'get' this guy can be viewed as 'entrapment'
      1. clarify at 10:39pm 29th December 2010 More precisely, it was modified to be able to run any software the owner chooses, including legitimate custom, homebrewed, shareware, freeware, or illegitimate pirated (for those who seek that) software.
    5. It's Theft at 5:02am 31st December 2010 Yes you can. But you can't modify the electric meter on your house so that you don't ever have to pay for electricity. Modifying his xbox 360 with a faster hard drive or more memory is one thing. Modifying it for the sole purpose of getting out of paying for games that developers literally spend millions of dollars to develop and sell is quite another. The chips he installed served no other purpose. That's stealing from the software developers and if enough people do that then developers will decide it's no longer a profitable business and move on to doing something else. Plenty of small developers go out of business for this very reason.
  84. Malandros at 10:29pm 2nd December 2010 Case was dismissed after the judge spent 30 minutes yelling at the prosecution on for being complete idiots and also attempting to use witnesses who broke the law to obtain there "evidence". Lol. Even though I saw this coming a mile away it makes me feel good to see that justice prevailed and snotty know-it-alls like the writer of this article got put in their place. Hope your foot tastes good Molly. ^_^
  85. Art at 11:39am 2nd December 2010 I hope the next report is more specific, showing exactly what modifications were made, including source code of any software. Surely this should be made public information so that the general public will know what not to do with an XBOX.
    1. ben at 12:00pm 2nd December 2010 Sounds like you just want to know how to mod yours.
      1. ore masta at 12:58pm 2nd December 2010 the cost might have just been the cost of the modifications themselves... $80 is not alot of money to do anything with... its a bit but it doesnt seem like he was trying to make much profit.
    2. Bryan O'Donnell at 10:16pm 14th December 2010 Yes. Great Idea. Also throw in some info about PS3. Indeed.
    3. TLWiz at 11:43am 30th December 2010 Google is your friend....
  86. Skyjoe at 10:09am 2nd December 2010 Just because something can be modified doesn't mean it should. Of course money motivates ordinary people to do illegal things every day but still, the question is right vs wrong. Very clearly, this guy knew that what he was doing was wrong - and he should pay for it. Now, does that mean jail time in a prison population already at 200%? In my opinion - no. Work release, re-education and mandatory volunteer work. Maybe volunteering at a Burn Ward at a hospital or an elderly care facility repairing refurbed XBOXs for patients would work for him. Prison, in my opinion, should only be for the worst of the worst.
    1. GFR at 1:45pm 13th December 2010 Once the hardware is sold to the buyer MS (or anybody else), has no right to tell the buyer what they can do with it. If they CAN do that then they haven't SOLD the hardware. It's that simple. It's like Ford selling me a new Mustang and then suing me if I want to drive it outside Connecticut.
      1. Jury Nullification at 9:34pm 23rd December 2010 Well, if you "purchase" something with Federal Reserve Notes, you have not taken ownership. It is no coincidence the USA got the 16th Amendment and the Federal Reserve Act at the same time period. The 16th amendment does not give the Feds any new taxing authority (as stated by the US supreme court); they still cannot tax individual earnings, just income (profits). They can also apply tariffs. If you are remunerated and pay with Federal Reserve Notes, you are not using money; rather, you are using debt receipts from the international, private bank called the Federal Reserve - a foriegn product. Since that debt note has a lien on it, and debt liens are transferable, it transfers to everything you think you purchase with it. The truth is, you are a slave. Your birth certificate documents you as government owned collateral to the bankers and your SSI number is your tracking number, you know, just like the ones Nazis put on the Jews arms that was a computer code for the IBM Hollerith system. But, hey, why should we worry about anything? Dancing with the stars, porno, and football are so much more meaningful and fulfilling than freedom and liberty. Almost Xmas, so be sure to obey and consume like a good American.
        1. Specs at 9:02pm 27th December 2010 So if I buy fertilizer and make a fertilizer bomb like Timmy McVeigh...that's okay? The guy was purposely modifying Xbox360 consoles for the sole purpose of having others using them for pirated games (which is theft) and violates the DCMA.
      2. Specs at 9:04pm 27th December 2010 More like someone bought a Ford Mustang...and then illegally modified it with Nitro boosters and a high-grade radar detector...and you bought that card and drove it in a state where radar detectors are illegal
      3. GFRreplier at 2:14pm 30th December 2010 In this case, no, it's like Ford selling you a new Mustang, then you going ahead and modifying the catalytic converter, then the state nailing you for not meeting emissions standards.
    2. Specs at 8:59pm 27th December 2010 F- That...put him in prison...and if he lives...he'll join some gang, possibly convert to Islam...get out and join a radical sect bent on causing chaos and havoc...or become a gang-member and focus on tech-finances (pirating and distributing movies and other digital mediums).
  87. Mark at 10:06am 2nd December 2010 I think intent will come into play here, if he was recorded saying that he did this to allow users to basically pirate software then there is a case against him. Otherwise, no case for just modyfying HW. In the early 1980's I used to modify my Atari 400 with a real keyboard and to add more memory, while not with the intent to pirate, the act of modifying HW is no different in and of itself.
    1. ken at 11:47am 7th December 2010 Sounds right to me.
    2. bugler at 10:44pm 9th December 2010 Not necessarily correct. Some crimes are "intent" based crimes. Some crimes are "knowingly" based crimes. Meaning with some laws it is irrelevant that you intended to do something illegal, it is just a matter of knowing you did some conduct. Under the DMCA, it is a crime to circumvent anti-piracy measures built into most commercial software. The gov't's claim is that in making these modifications to the hardware to create a device to allow illegal software, he violated the DMCA. I have not checked yet whether the DMCA provides for intent based crimes or knowingly based crimes.
  88. Jamie at 6:54am 2nd December 2010 He didn't sell or distribute pirated software therefore, the only possible case I see is modifying the xbox for commercial gain. If he had modified the consoles for free they'd have no case against him.
    1. jamiesanswer at 2:12pm 30th December 2010 No, there's a better way. He simply needs to maintain that he was only modifying them for the purposes of "experimentation." Due to antiquated laws designed to encourage old ham radio operators to experiment and innovate, there are protections in place for anyone seeking to 'experiment' by modifying hardware to work differently. The fact that it enabled the defeat of DCMA is just an 'unintended consequence", and therefore not actionable. It only becomes actionable once the owner of the device USES it to defeat DCMA.
    2. Jonathan at 5:18pm 30th December 2010 How can that be illegal? He's trying to make a living - and the sting operation isn't sanctified by the government but RIAA or MPAA? Just wondering, and this isn't a big deal - governments have more bigger fish to fry.
  89. Mee at 6:22pm 1st December 2010 this guy is obviously pretty smart to modify a machine like that, they don't teach that in any course so he should be given a great job instead of jail time.
    1. javasrpt at 3:11pm 3rd December 2010 so then why don't we hire murderes to join the armed services...? bottom line is he doesn't deserve a good job for stealing. Thats like saying lets give the hacker who stole a million credit cards a job at our company so we can safeguard our data better....
      1. Colin at 8:10am 4th December 2010 Actually the best con men ARE recruited to work for the 'good' side more often than you might think, look at Frank Abagnale.
      2. Sasha at 9:30pm 10th December 2010 It's capitalism. Like it or not, everyone does it except sucker consumers who pay retail... From Bernie Madoff to this little guy... everyone games the system. heck at least he is better than being a social security burden... now if you put him out of business, he might become even more desperate. We have always had pirates... this country was built by pirates. A good number of respectable rich families still are rich owing to their slave-owning days... you know... the guys who got those generous tax breaks?
      3. javascript at 2:09pm 30th December 2010 "Thats like saying lets give the hacker who stole a million credit cards a job at our company so we can safeguard our data better...." As a matter of fact, that's EXACTLY what they do already... As far as MS and hackers..."No one screams louder than a thief being robbed."
  90. unusablesignal at 6:01pm 1st December 2010 Yeah. California prisons are at 200% capacity. Plenty of room for these type of 'criminals'. What about the makers of the chips? Who else? Soldering iron manufacturers. Microsoft, you suck.
    1. SCREW THE GREEDY at 3:24pm 7th December 2010 SCREW the GREEDY!!! Thats why soon you will start to see people using terrorism to attack the rich "EN-MASS". It is time for the rich to distribute all of there greedy wealth and eliminate the poor class. Hell, now you can't even work for them scum bags unless you have a degree and a background check and perfect credit. Time to waste the rich. (I do not encourage violence on any level... We just want justice for the poor and needy. Sick and tired of snooty rich people.
      1. Choicesdefine at 5:41am 8th December 2010 You are, in fact, advocating violence in the name of "class stuggle," a Marxist concept; as is redistribution of wealth. If you cannot qualify to work for Microsoft, that is the result of your own choices and actions or the lack thereof. They have the right to hire whomever they please and do not owe you money nor a job. If you want to work for them, get an education and pay for what you use (pay your bills.) Nobody forces you to use what they produce. Make your own game system from scratch if you are so smart. You buy a game system because you want what it can do that you can't or won't create yourself. You agree with the manufacturer to abide by the licensing agreement, but then you want to cheat the arrangement you agreed to because it becomes expensive to play by those rules you agreed to. When there are consequences, you cry, "Unfair!" I have no pity for you or for anyone who enables piracy. You have to pay to play. Or, you can make mud pies with all of your creativity. Better yet, go to school and pay your bills. It's called "growing up." Look into it.
        1. Will at 9:58pm 9th December 2010 Well said. Thank you.
          1. Sasha at 9:24pm 10th December 2010 Only suckers ever take that agreement seriously. You are subsidizing the rest of the free world in that we obediently follow the dictates of our masters while everyone else has FREEDOM to do what they want with their machines. The fact that these corporations and the government are powerless and impotent elsewhere makes them even more adamant about those whom they CAN control --meaning the US consumer. The US consumer is a real sucker --always has. Same thing with pharmaceuticals... other countries get cheap generics (their governments bargain collectively for them) while we are stuck with having to subsidize everyone else... or cross into Canada to get cheaper meds. Pharma, like software giants and everyone else, have you by the balls, US consumer. If you believe in the paying top dollar to play, then you are a sucker. Everyone else--including the manufacturer of the games-- games the system... Nobody plays fair. That $4.00 beer you are buying at sale price of 3.50 costs 10 cents a unit to make--labor and materials included. "gamers beware"... what are they gonna do, inspect every garage across this huge country? Get real. The fact that they only caught ONE suburbanite guy says it all.
        2. ladrikius at 11:55am 13th December 2010 Perhaps I am naive, but I assumed SCREW THE GREEDY was being sarcastic.
        3. ChoicesReDefined at 2:07pm 30th December 2010 If you're such a fan of market forces, then you should understand that the market creates the 'need' for piracy. No one pirates anything that's easier to get legally. Why? Because there's no money in it! DUH. It's only when there is such demand for a product, that the supplier raises the price BEYOND what the market can bear, that the pirates have fertile ground for their products and/or services. When record companies got greedy, and charged exorbitant prices, Napster was born. When cable companies, many having monopolies in several large metropolitan markets, raised their rates to unfair levels, people started using 'pirate boxes' there too. Same thing for the satellite dish owners. If the content providers had constrained their own greed, the pirates never would have had a market in the first place. If Microsoft didn't enjoy the monopoly it does, there would have been no 'demand' for pirated copies of the OS in other countries. It's only through their monopoly that they were able to charge whatever they wished. Pirates/hackers are the ultimate "market correction".
  91. Ronno at 5:21pm 1st December 2010 There are misspellings and bad grammar in this article ("strangly" ...everything else "its" ever said...). Sloppy work on the part of the writer, the copy editor, and CNN for picking it up. Too bad, since it seems well-enough researched.
    1. ioman at 3:13pm 2nd December 2010 They spelled it "strangely" which is correct....not sure what you are seeing.
      1. Sharon at 6:44pm 9th December 2010 Maybe he meant 'like being strangled' ; "strangly" LOL
      2. ladrikius at 11:53am 13th December 2010 CNN frequently corrects mistakes in syntax, spelling, grammar when the mistake is pointed out.
    2. eehreum at 10:44pm 14th December 2010 it's hilarious how the misspellings and grammar mistakes were corrected in the original article. yet, people are giving ronno a thumbs down because a week after the fact they don't see the mistakes.... the rest of you could at least think a little before you make a judgment haha.
    3. BLOOD RED VAN at 3:16am 30th December 2010 THERE IS NO JUSTICE - NO ONE READS, WRITES AND PROOF READS ANYMORE. WHO CARES BECAUSE WE WRITE IN TEXT AND IT IS ACCEPTED!
    4. Mel at 11:19pm 30th December 2010 Not the first time I've seen a misspelled CNN article. Hell, even some of Psychology Today's! Lowers credibility no matter HOW credible a source. :/
  92. Fay Paxton at 9:38am 1st December 2010 Can't we find more important things to imprison people for?
    1. javasrpt at 1:28pm 3rd December 2010 If you started selling a product only to have someone take your idea and modify it to make money off of you, would you then understand why it is so important for the law to be involved? You may not see it this way, but we are so lucky to see that the law worked in this instance. Call it what you want, he is stealing money that isn't his by modifying something he has no right to touch.
      1. No M$ at 4:16pm 3rd December 2010 Really? What if I put a new fuel injection system in my car? what if I modify my microwave to be more powerful? I didn't RENT the console I bought it. It is mine. M$ can't come into my house and take it away. They detect is modified and ban me from Xbox Live? Fine. I agree with that. But if I want to launch the thing into space so that it send signals back to me who the heck cares?
        1. SomeLawyer at 1:22pm 4th December 2010 That's not entirely true. Microsoft owns the intellectual property rights to the hardware, even if you buy usage rights in the store and get to bring the item home. While nobody cares what you do to it at home, if you start selling your services and making money off of it you can open a whole new can of worms. You didn't invest millions of dollars into developing the system, they did. If you want to make money off their technology you have to buy the rights to do so. This is, however, beside the point here. In this case he was making a specific modification with the sole and explicit purpose of enabling users to play illegal, pirated games. This is the primary reason he's in trouble now and the reasoning why the court refused to allow him to make a "fair use" argument in his defense. He's being prosecuted for the digital media violations, which undermine the gaming industry, not just for modding hardware.
          1. Doc Z at 6:21am 8th December 2010 I think it is an erroneous assumption to say that this modification was the "sole and explicit purpose" of enabling users to play illegal pirated games. I had mine done so I could play copied versions of my own games, because X boxes can damage the disk and you have to go out and pay full price for a new one. If I wanted to play online, I use the original. In order for them to make the case, they would have to prove intent, Modifications are done on X boxes all the time, that doesn't mean they will be used to play pirated software. It may be this guy will be a martyr for the other modders as facts of the prosecution are published. Modders must do like others and give their disclaimers: "For offroad use only" "Do not make illegals copies".......etc. Many of the arguments above make perfect sense, until you go to court. Common sense and what is fair are trampled by the letter of the law, anyone who has ever gotten divorced can attest to that. Read the Digital Millenia copywrite law you'll see. I don't think pirating is fair, but I don't think videos and cd's should cost so much either. It's not that the person or talent gets all the money from it either, lots of people get a slice. But the talent at places like Bungie earn what they sell, and I don't mind paying for it, once. But if in fact, the people are asking him to modify it for the purpose of using pirated software, I think those people should be prosecuted as well, for they are, in fact, the thieves. Where's Johnny Cochran when you need him?
        2. Joe at 10:49am 7th December 2010 It actually is illegal to mod any part of an engine of a registered vehicle without applying for a new VIN, and passing smog, at least in California. An extreme example is you remove the diesel engine and put in a gas engien. Your VIN has the engine type encoded into it, and you would be lying to the DMV by not smogging it.
          1. wbaldwin at 12:23am 8th December 2010 Installing a performance chip in your fuel injected vehicle is completely legal, i live in CA. However, it voids the car's warranty after installing it. If a vehicle's owner chooses to speed, break traffic laws, or fail to keep the emissions up to code it is not the responsibility of the manufacturer of said performance chip. It is the vehicle owners problem.
      2. PhxBryant at 6:28pm 5th December 2010 Here is the problem with your own statement. "Modify." Not copy, not claim as his own, not infringe on patent law. I guess in your world if I "Case Mod" the system I am violating federal law as well. Since I modifiy the paint scheme, the look, the style. I guess this applies to installing my own custom designed fan cooling system for improved cooling and increased system reliability over MS's original design I have somehow violated federal law as well. I guess if I did this same mod to my personal system because I am tired of my 360 tray-dropping discs causing them unusable and I wanted to avoid purchasing more than one master copy I have violated federal law. So fair use does not exist if I own the system, and the media? In this case, it does not matter unless he was copying game discs he did not own. I did not read anywhere where he was being prosecuted for pirating game media. Do you know how many other people would have to be prosecuted as well for this law to be enforceable? Every automotive enthusiast, tuners, home owner (since most homes are modified in one form or another since originally constructed), cooks and restaurant owners (for modifying recipes for their own personal gain). And your last statement is just plain ignorant. He can not be stealing money by providing a service that Microsoft does not offer. If he was building his own "copies" of Xbox360 in China and selling them as such, "that is stealing." If you modify a product already purchased and owned by the consumer, you are providing a service, not stealing. Microsoft did not lose any monies from this transaction. If the owner of the Xbox was copying media and using it without a MS license then the owner is the one that needs to be prosecuted, but only if he did not own an original copy. This is the only place your lack of argument could work.
        1. K3YS at 9:12am 6th December 2010 Dude, thats like saying people that make crack cocaine cant be punished if they make it in their house. If i want to mod my 360 and keep it in my house and use it then fine. If i want to mod my car, a recipe, or build a garage on my house, or any of the other rediculous things you referred to, its all the same because its mine. But when you modify someone elses stuff or perform a service that is intended to break the law, you are going to be held accountable for the service you perform. If i smoke weed it is illegal. If i smoke weed and also sell it, its 100 times worse. Its selling an illelgal service. Period
      3. Oneleg at 4:37am 6th December 2010 ever hear of the "car" industry? People will always want something they buy made different then what other people have. Probably one of the biggest things happening with gaming consoles is the PSP hacking going on out there. Xbox, PS, Wii have been getting hacked since Atari came out. This is nothing new.
      4. SCREW THE RICH at 3:20pm 7th December 2010 Bullocks! He is taking from some super RICH guy and distributing the wealth like it's supposed to be! Why should one company get to make billions off of one persons idea? Thats what slows down technology!!! Greedy people wanting to make millions and billions. Why would one game cost $50? It should cost like $10. To hell with all of you rich selfish people!!!
        1. Sasha at 9:03pm 10th December 2010 And as always, the little guy is the one the big boys always go after. Heck, China opened up cars, copied them wholesale and are now coming out with their own brand. They don't make it out here in the US because the car manufacturers would have a heart attack competing against a Chinese car that is 30% cheaper than what is out here. It is called the Cherry. There are other brands out there already spreading like wildfire. Man... this guy is seriously small fry.
        2. JODIE at 12:59pm 14th December 2010 i I SO AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS ALWAYS AFTER THE LITTLE GUY..
    2. jodie at 12:56pm 14th December 2010 instead of putting him in prison why don,t they hire him to work on there side, [to help] what good will it do to lock this guy up he sounds pretty smart to me.. why not work harder going after the real criminals,, who harm children or the 1,s who give our kids drugs that kill them such as in the case of my daugther these ppl are still walking free, and have not spent 1 day in jail... were is the justice in this give him a job not jail....
    3. Jury Nullification at 9:21pm 23rd December 2010 Yes, we can.. and we do. America imprisons a larger portion of its population than any other nation on the planet - even the ones the benevolent government tells you are so scary and evil. The prison system in this country is used to enforce corporate rules while also realizing profits. Just look at the admitted story of US Marines guarding and providing fertilizer for the poppy fields in Afghanistan. Then, the CIA and banks are totally involved with shipping the drugs into America and laundering the cash. Heck, the illicit drug cash is a huge portion of actual liquid assets passing through America's banks. Then, if you get caught with some weed, you can face jail time. They profit in all directions, the war to acquire, the importation and selling, the contracts to militarize the cops for drug raids, the building and filling of prisons, and the fines for those lucky enough not to end up in a work camp.. I mean a prison. Americans need to wake the heck up and rediscover JURY NULLIFICATION. Jury duty is not an inconvenience, people. We have no, absolutely zero, direct input to laws and statutes - politicians and lobbyists write them. Also, unjust laws are not enforceable if people simply exercise their responsibilities during a trial. Most people wrongly believe that all that matters when deciding a case is "the letter of the law." Totally wrong. In reality, the law is completely irrelevant! The jury the is finer of all fact and law during a trial. The "law" is just as in question as is the innocence or guilt of the defendant. Laws that are against human rights, the US and state constitution, and the will of the people should be nullified by juries in order to render the government impotent to enforcement them. This is the truth; otherwise, there would be no need for a jury - a judge can directly interpret "laws" made by the criminals in political office. It is also core to setting case precedence. Jury nullification pressured the government into the 21st Amendment eliminating the alcohol prohibition, during which the gracious government of the land of the "free" killed over 10,000 Americans by poisoning the ethyl alcohol the people were using to distill liquor. So, the next time you get a jury summons, pray you get on a jury and the defendant does not plea. That will be your opportunity to bring a sliver of real justice back into the oxymoron in America called the justice system. Likewise, do not plea if you are ever threatened with prosecution. Unfortunately, due to jury ignorance, even innocent people are at high risk of conviction during a trial. Maybe Ben Franklin was right, the offical bird of the USA should be a turkey. That or an ostrich with its head in the sand. A bald eagle is far too eligant to represent the current US society.
    4. Randall at 4:11pm 25th December 2010 Gamers are safe targets, They dont carry guns well atleast out of the game. cops and Feds might get hurt going after real criminals.
    5. steveareno at 3:19pm 29th December 2010 it's not personal...it's just business...as don corleone would say....business is running and ruining the usa
  93. charlie hustle at 9:19pm 30th November 2010 this article sounds like it was intented to be a threat.... "oh gamers better watch out" lol ..... i agree with jig awat there are no other convictions pertaining to this type of activity, and it appears he has not broken any specific law. i would be disappointed in our justice system if he were singled out, and went to jail over something that used to be praised by the manufacturer. what a joke!
    1. MyExitStaysMyExit at 3:27am 2nd December 2010 true its even worse seeing as the article closes with: Whatever the company’s true feelings on the subject, Crippen is facing extremely dire consequences for his own actions. Something gamers everywhere would be wise to take heed of. Take heed of? Lol did mircorsoft pay them to make this article? If so they do a poor job hiding it.
      1. Sasha at 8:53pm 10th December 2010 Take heed indeed... what a bunch of crap. And the only gamers they can really threaten are gamers in the US--specifically those in huge cities. You cannot police every little garage of every person here... not to mention this is freely done elsewhere in the world without any consequences.
    2. Antonio at 9:23am 2nd December 2010 I agree with you guys on the hardware mod itself not being the problem, but here's where he may get hammered by the prosecution. He charged people (small business), including the undercover cop, to modify microsoft's copyrighted hardware which allowed the use of pirated software. They may get him on being a co-conspirator on the piracy (felony) because it sounds like he was advertising and bragging about setting up the machines (not sure, haven't heard the tape). Being creative + innovative does not always mean being smart. At least they didn't come after him like the music industry started doing. Also, bear in mind that even if microsoft loses the case, they can sue him in civil court. I wish him luck whatever the end results is.
      1. TeamW at 1:39pm 9th December 2010 You got Antonio...that's the fine line he crossed.....he should have asked for a "small donation" instead of "charging money" for services rendered. Good luck Crippen.
      2. Sharon at 6:39pm 9th December 2010 Not really. You are paying a guy to use tools and knowledge that you may not possess. Or maybe you do, but don't have the time and patience to use them, and you're paying for the convienience of having someone else do it; much like an oil change. So what if you pay a customs shop to mod your vehicle, and it performs better, and goes faster. Does that make them liable if you get a speeding ticket because they changed the original configuration? Of course not. In the end, the user is responsible for his own decisions. Just because you CAN pull the trigger on a gun doesn't make you a mass murderer. Just because you CAN play hacked games doesn't mean you will.
        1. Sasha at 8:55pm 10th December 2010 That is the perfect argument! Could not have said it better. Someone else said this is like selling a gun to someone who ends up murdering. The gun store owner isn't liable for what the customer does with his purchase.
  94. Jig Awat at 8:12pm 30th November 2010 It isn't illegal to just modify the hardware. microsoft will LOSE LOSE LOSE that one. if he was pirating games and then selling them, that's quite another. but it doesn't sound like he was. what a joke. engineering students are more creative and innovative than kinnect's official developers.
    1. javasrpt at 1:23pm 3rd December 2010 Kinect's official developers... what do you know about that? Project Natal's dev team are some of the brightest minds in the gaming industry.
      1. SICKofIT at 3:15pm 7th December 2010 This is ridiculous! Is there any more freedoms our government can take away from us in the name of big corporations? How much longer until we have to get a permit to visit our family in another state, or have a chip under our skin to buy milk. The Government needs to quit working to protect big corps and start helping those in need. Screw You Government. Now i think i will go MOD more XBOxes for them being cry babies!
        1. Tobi at 5:33am 8th December 2010 "He was making modifications to the hardware of a proprietary device for the purpose of allowing his clients to infringe on copyrights." Hmmm...does that mean all automobile companies should be arrested for making cars that can exceed the 70mph speed limit in most states?
        2. bugler at 10:08pm 9th December 2010 Yeah whatever. What freedom are you talking about, the freedom to steal or to assistant in a criminal conspiracy to steal? To link that to a possible threat on the to travel is childish and moronic.
        3. Jay at 6:40am 10th December 2010 As part of buying a 360, you are agreeing to no circumventing the copy protection ... it's in the EULA. If you don't agree to it, don't buy it.
          1. Sasha at 9:38pm 10th December 2010 oooh! EULA! the rest of the world scoffs at that. These corporations... this government is powerless elsewhere! those words mean nothing to the rest of the world! It's an empty threat uttered by an impotent organization. Not even Disney can stop China from manufacturing Mickey Mouse products. and you know what happens when piracy is rampant elsewhere? the price of the original product has to go down to compete and compete they do! it's only here where people accept these ridiculous prices as so that they can charge any price and you just go dig in your pocket... the US consumer is a sucker!
          2. Terminator at 10:24pm 29th December 2010 I don't believe all people who buy a 360 agree to the EULA (show me the signatures), and even if they do, what if you buy one used without agreeing to a EULA?
    2. SomeLawyer at 1:08pm 4th December 2010 "Microsoft" can't "lose" anything here. Microsoft isn't suing this guy, the federal government is prosecuting him. He was making modifications to the hardware of a proprietary device for the purpose of allowing his clients to infringe on copyrights. While he wasn't pirating games himself, he was enabling pirated games to work on the device, which is essentially the same thing. This is not a joke, it is a serious crime with serious consequences. By the way, the "creativity" of engineering students is clearly irrelevant to this.
      1. kekeke at 6:37pm 4th December 2010 If you purchase a hardware system you should be able to modify the hardware provided you don't do anything illegal with it. So if you are doing the modifying you shouldn't have to worry as long as you haven't touched any software. If you purchase an XBOX system you own the hardware you're not renting it. Let me put it this way if I de-soldered all of the electrical components from the XBOX 360 board and then fabricated a similar board which provided some of the same capabilities, then I re-soldered all of the components onto the new board. But wait I added an extra micro-controller did I infringe on someone's rights? I would say no, you now own those components and you may add others as you see fit. So you may not be able to connect to official XBOX live, so what? Honestly though, I doubt this report is accurate, it's probably more of a tax evasion charge and someone is trying to spin it as a IP/Copyright issue for more site visits. Or maybe they really know he was including some pirated software with the modification.
        1. bugler at 10:30pm 9th December 2010 You say that if you purchase a hardware system, you should be able to modify the hardware provided you don't do anything illegal with it. Well, that is exactly what this guy did do. Under the DMCA, it is a crime to circumvent anti-piracy measures built into most commercial software. By making these modifications to the hardward to allow illegal software, he violated the DMCA without touching any software. There are other provisions of the DMCA which talk about the software and making cracking devices, but in this case, it is about making a device to circumvent anti-piracy measures.
        2. Sasha at 8:37pm 10th December 2010 indeed, how is it any different from those engineers that turned their Priuses into plug-in models? That's a bigger tampering... although no pirated software is involved in it. but really, it is murky since how is it different than when some gamers lend their discs or cartriges to other gamers? It's the same thing, technically.
      2. concerned American at 11:12am 6th December 2010 the problem here is that the feds are prosecuting. they are doing so because microsoft is pushing for it. its no different than the bozos at the recording industry or movie industry. all those assclowns think they should be able to have completely shrink-free businesses instead of claiming losses. so , the federal government has basically pimped themselves out to private business, which is completely fucking wrong. and thats what is happening here too. the DMCA is a dangerous piece of legislation that needs to be reworked. its overreaching and overly ambiguous - on purpose.
      3. the consumer at 12:34pm 6th December 2010 put it this way you own this device why not modify to your choice . the goverment telling you how to enjoy your video game .go afther the guys the sale pirate games . don't these corporations have made billions of us and we cant save a buck once a while . does bill gates needs more money to wipe his arse. stuff like this makes me angry and things dont turn nice when im angry
      4. Mark at 9:06am 7th December 2010 Might as well prosecute all gun shop owners as their consumers "can" use the gun for illegal activities This case has no merit unless the perp was actually selling counterfeit games.
        1. bugler at 10:34pm 9th December 2010 You are incorrect. The DMCA is not limited to selling counterfeit games. Under the DMCA, it is a crime to circumvent anti-piracy measures built into most commercial software. By making these modifications to the hardward to allow illegal software, he violated the DMCA. There are other provisions of the DMCA which talk about the software and making cracking devices, but in this case, it is about making a device to circumvent anti-piracy measures which is also a violation of the DMCA.
          1. Russr at 2:11pm 10th December 2010 You are, unfortunately, correct. Which is why the DMCA should NEVER have been passed into law. It is draconian, restrictive legislation that has already impacted the academic world, and stunts ingenuity. Search for DMCA and HDCP for an example. If the manufacturers can't come up with a secure mechanism, it should be their shame, not government area of enforement. Why did the voting public allow this to pass, anyway? This puts the US at a disadvantage in so many ways. Not to mention that all it takes is some pimply faced brat in Copenhagen, or Mumbay, etc, etc, etc who will crack these things next time. Trying to ensure "piracy protection" is like plugging whole in a dyke. I would normally just say "Get over it" to the manufacturers, but it's too late for that!
            1. Sasha at 8:45pm 10th December 2010 Indeed! Plus, I find it really hilarious that the US consumer IS by and large the sucker of the world. Everyone else has hacked phones, consoles and computers enabling them to use whatever software they please whenever they want --in other words, total freedom to do whatever you want with your possessions. Global corporations have always stuck it to the US consumer --whether its for the high price of pharmaceuticals (everyone the world over are enjoying cheaply made generics) to software games and the like. Stateside buyers really are subsidizing the vast majority out there who do enjoy this freedom because they live in shores where even the giant mega-conglomerates are impotent. So like bullies, they take it out on us who live in the States... where their cronies can quash our innovative spirit and freedom... because they can't bully anyone else out there.
            2. DooDoo at 10:27pm 29th December 2010 I find it funny (gallows humor) that the judge excludes fair use because the DMCA doesn't mention it. As if the entirety of laws, precedents, and even the constitution itself is irrelevant since the judge apparently is choosing to enforce the DMCA regarless of any conflict with constitution or precedent. What a crock of doo doo.
      5. SCREW YOU at 3:17pm 7th December 2010 You must be a Republican! Stop your whining calling this a serious crime. you are about STUPID and you must be a record producer or a music artist crybaby! shovel it buddy, You can't stop hackers!
        1. wabi at 2:27pm 8th December 2010 What does being a republican have to do with it? The relevant thing is that the writer claims to be "SomeLawyer", which explains everything, and not all lawyers are republicans. Don't you know lawyers love so called "intellectual property" laws. How do you know when a lawyer's lying? (when his lips move) What's the difference between a dead skunk on the road and a dead lawyer on the road? (skid marks in front of the skunk)
        2. Unscrewer at 1:38pm 30th December 2010 And you must be an asshole, trying to paint this as politically partisan.
      6. Really? at 5:28pm 7th December 2010 Your premise, while it may be legally correct, is wrong. It seems that when you purchase something, you should have the right to tinker with it as you please because it's your property. The guy is not stealing intellectual rights or modifying the software or something like that. You said enabling pirated games to work on the device was the same thing as pirating that games; that's not true. Are you then saying that car manufacturers that make cars that can go beyond the speed limit are liable? Are dvd manufacturers liable for pirated dvd's?
        1. Sasha at 8:49pm 10th December 2010 Indeed! I mentioned earlier about the guys making the Prius -all electric plug in before there were any plug in models... it's just a personal freedom to modify your machine however you like. And like in my earlier post, corporations just love bullying the American consumer because that is all they can reach... everyone else in the world enjoys this total freedom except in the "Land of the Free".
      7. wabi at 2:29pm 8th December 2010 If you're a lawyer, then you should know that a crime requires a victim and damages. These goons cannot prove damages. Even if they could the cost would be what, 20 video game sales? But they cannot prove they would have sold the games in the absence of the hardware mods.
        1. Seymour Brighton at 6:39pm 9th December 2010 There don't have to be "damages" for someone to be breaking Federal law. Remember, the defendant in this case is the police, or rather, the US Gov. Not Microsoft. So the victim is the government, and the defendant is accused with breaking the country's laws. The judge, however, should find the defendant not guilty because, in a free country, you should be able to give money to someone for tinkering in your Hi-Fi system, or your gaming system, or under the hood of your car, and that person not feel worried that he will go to jail for HOW YOU USE YOUR OWN PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE. If the law is wrong or ambiguous, then it must be changed.
          1. Seymour Brighton at 6:42pm 9th December 2010 Sorry, I meant the plaintiff in this case is the government, not Microsoft. The defendant is the guy who shouldn't be sent to jail for performing work on other people's stuff.
      8. Seymour Brighton at 6:36pm 9th December 2010 SomeLawyer, it's not a serious crime. It's a silly crime. And you are a silly lawyer. These are objective facts of the universe apparent to any observer. I rest my case.
      9. joe at 6:34pm 10th December 2010 this is a serious crime thats a joke right? the crime is some jerk off cop going after people for nonsense.this kid is not a criminal but he will be by the time he gets out of prison.any one who thinks he should go to prison for playing games should be sent to prison themselves for being rediculous
    3. Elbonian at 6:23am 6th December 2010 It looks like the trial blew up in the government's face when it failed to prove that the defendant actually used any pirated game. The government had alleged the use of such a game in order to get around the judge's finding that such a use was a required act to complete the crime, but there was no evidence that the defendant ever himself used any pirated game. So, the prosecutors agreed to dismiss the case.
    4. Frank at 11:56pm 12th December 2010 Are you an attorney, I think NOT!
    5. james at 12:27am 15th December 2010 im not replying just to Jigawat im only expressing this to everyone, we all know microsoft has enough money, some of which he began his franchise by selling his work that was not aceived by himself work he obatined by cheating out his friends and then trying to capitalize on thier knowledge thus goes to show what a joke and a cheapskate microsft is, so griping about someone smarter than him especialy if the guy can hack microsofts software goes to show that he is just absoluely jelous and dumb founded and his only course of action is to go after this guy , and in retrospect by ding so has made himself look like a jack A^&*^*s like he realy needed the money he is going to get from this person what ajoke,
      1. jamesisanidiot at 1:53pm 30th December 2010 The only jack A^&^*^*s here is you. Gates cheated no one when he started. And since he made his billions, he's not only created more new millionaires than anyone else in the industry, he's also contributed more to charity than anyone else in the industry. So what have YOU done? Besides, DCMA isn't a Microsoft law, it's a federal law, and the feds are the ones that busted the guy.
    6. Harvey Wright at 6:20am 30th December 2010 I don't know much about Kinnect but I do know that open source is not free. There are copyright laws involved with open source, true, it is freely available but just try to say that say a Linux, music player written by someone else is yours. That is a breach of the Open Source Licensing. Now if you say John Doe is the original creator and you have a modification then you have the rights to the modification (Only). That is open source and you can sell it for a fee if you decide to. Open Source is not Free it is only freely available.
    7. Thanifex at 11:52am 30th December 2010 Its not that he is modifying the box its he is moding and selling the service. making profit off a copy right item.
Close Suggestion Forget the Nook, the Kindle’s competition is the iPad
View Article