Treyarch took over the reins from Infinity Ward for Black Ops. But can they fill the large shoes left for them? In a word, yes.

Today marks the release of a minor title, an indie game developed on a shoestring budget, with no real expectations. If you believe that, we should totally play a wager match together.  After months of hype, and following one of the most drama-filled situations in recent gaming history with Infinity Ward, Call of Duty: Black Ops has been released. Thanks to the appeal of the subject, the pedigree of the name, and the monstrous success of the last game in the series, Modern Warfare 2, Black Ops was destined to be a massive hit from the moment it was announced. But would it be any good?

Activision could have sold Black Ops on name recognition alone. It could have released a terrible game and still made money on the pre-orders, but it would have damaged the most successful third-party property in video game history. After the falling out between Activision and Infinity Ward, the level of scrutiny on the franchise has been at an all time high. But the behind-the-scenes drama isn’t important right now. If you are curious about the telenovela surrounding the Infinity Ward and Activision split, you can read more about it here. Or just wait for the multiple lawsuits to begin. But for now, it is Treyarch’s big day. So with the video game world watching, did Treyarch manage to succeed with the shadow of its predecessor looming so large?

Yep, they sure did.

Call of Duty: Black Ops does a few things very well — mainly by not doing anything at all. Rather than reinvent the wheel, Treyarch looked at what worked and what didn’t with Modern Warfare 2 and its last title, Call of Duty: World at War, then made changes — some subtle, some innovative — but for the most part the game looks and plays like the previous games in the series. In a good way. The multiplayer is as strong as ever and some of the new features have added a layer of depth that will keep fans playing for a long time, while the campaign delivers one of the most intense stories you will ever see in a video game. So basically, Black Ops lives up to the hype.

The Cold War

With just a little bit of work, the story of Black Ops could easily be adapted into a Hollywood movie. It has the action elements down, plenty of twists and turns, and it touches on enough historical events without subjecting itself to the limitations of history, to make it appeal to a broad audience.  World at War contained some compelling characters, interesting scenarios, and intense scenarios, but there wasn’t much of a story. It was WWII—you fought the enemy and advanced; beyond that there wasn’t much to it. On the other hand, the Modern Warfare titles took a more fantastic story, with invasions, nuclear detonations, and the start of World War III. Black Ops falls somewhere in between.

You play as Alex Mason, and in a change for the series, you are a fully realized character, voiced by Sam Worthington, with a very specific story. Unlike previous entries, you do not switch between characters (with a few brief exceptions), and you are not just “that guy”, bouncing between events because you are trained to be there like all the characters in a WWII game. Instead, Mason is at the center of a mystery involving a series of numbers that relate to his long career as a soldier, which has included some some of the most difficult, and secretive missions that occurred during the Cold War. Beginning with the Bay of Pigs, Black Ops weaves in and out of Mason’s career as a soldier, a spy and an assassin, and takes him everywhere from Cuba to Vietnam; from the Ural Mountains to Star City, Russia.

Mason has seen the worst places in the world, and along the way he has made allies and enemies with people that live in the shadows. One of those people is Viktor Reznov, the one-time Russian Sergeant who acted as your guide through the Russian settings in World at War. Voiced by Gary Oldman, Reznov and Mason form a friendship through mutual adversity, and the pair work together despite their ideologies, in order to stop a new enemy. Giving away more would do more of a disservice than it would help illuminate the game, but the story is well thought out, and the finale nicely wraps everything up.

Joining Worthington and Oldman in the cast are Ed Harris, Ice Cube, Topher Grace, Emmanuelle Chriqui, and more. Treyarch approached this game like a studio would approach the sequel to blockbuster movie. There are no corners cut on the scope of this game, and each level contains moments that make you want to simply stop and look around. When mixed with real events and real people like President Kennedy, Castro, and many more, the story is arguably the best in the Call of Duty series, and one of the best FPS shooter plots ever told.

Black Ops is perhaps the most mature game ever made. While there are no hookers to beat up ala Grand Theft Auto, there are also no comedic moments to offset some truly brutal scenes of violence and carnage. This is not a game for kids, it is a game for a more mature audience, and should be treated as such lest it becomes another exhibit in the case against violent video games. If this game were a movie, it would be a hard R.

Because Hollywood loves to try and make money off of things that already made money, it wouldn’t be all that surprising that someone tried to make Black Ops into a movie. It would be ironic though, since Black Ops is already pretty much a movie that just happens to be a video game.

The gameplay is what you would expect, in a good way

The gameplay of the campaigns is as solid as you might hope from a Call of Duty game, and the new additions, like the crossbow with exploding bolts, gas grenades, and a handful of other additions keep the game feeling new even though it will be very familiar. The missions are varied and interesting, and while sometimes you will be involved in stealth missions, the majority of your time will be spent fighting for your life as the enemy closes in on you, or you suddenly find yourself on the frontline of a major battle. Black Ops continually mixes it up, and each level has something unique to offer.

Black Ops offers a satisfying campaign that will last you between seven and nine hours, longer if you increase the difficulty, and odds are you will want to play through more than once.

The look of the 1960s

Black Ops looks amazing at times and generally maintains some stellar graphics throughout the campaign, which is important because the look and tone play a huge part to the storytelling.  The character animation, both in facial and body movements, are top notch, and the sound is also well done for the most part, with a few exceptions.  Oddly, the multiplayer graphics are not quite as impressive, especially compared to Modern Warfare 2, but they are still solid. The music is nothing spectacular, but it is not obtrusive either, and it is generally overpowered by the sound of gunfire and explosions any way– although the sounds do seem off at times.  It might be a syncing issue.

It is easy to take the graphics on games like Call of Duty for granted.  They are the leaders in the gaming industry, and stellar graphics are expected.  Perhaps this is unfair and it takes away from the accomplishments of the designers.  Black Ops looks amazing, and the look quickly helps to build the atmosphere of the story.

It isn’t all gravy

While the story, graphics and settings are generally amazing with a few exceptions, there are a few technical glitches that mire the exceptional campaign. The levels are always linear, so it is generally easy to find your way around, but sometimes the mission objectives can be unclear, even contradictory. A few objectives will ask you to take a location, but your teammates will simply sit there as the position you are meant to take is literally surrounded by enemies. Sometimes you just need to take the “Leroy Jenkins” approach to the game and charge in to see what happens.

Treyarch also loves to toss you in situations where you are not able to wait it out, instead you must fight through to get to the next point. If you don’t move, the enemies will simply keep on coming endlessly. It adds to the sense of intensity, but it also can become frustrating when you are unsure what exactly you need to do.

There are also several instances of AI befuddlement, where your teammates will wander around aimlessly, and take cover until you advance well beyond them. It is also good that they are invincible, since they tend to wander in and out of gunfire now and then. The enemy AI are equally simple, and most will stay exactly where they are, no matter what, except to maybe move a few feet to the side.

Thankfully, these glitches are minor and are more quibbles than problems. The campaign is so good that when something goes wrong, it stands out like a spotlight in the dark. While you can be assured that you will see a problem or two along the way, you can also be sure that you will quickly forget about it as the pace of the game pushes you ever onward.

And now, the multiplayer

While the campaign might be worth the price of admission, a good chunk of the people that buy the game will buy it just for the multiplayer. Putting aside every question about how it plays, what the leveling is like, and all that, the answer to the one question that most fans of the series will want to know is yes—it is good enough to succeed Modern Warfare 2.

To delve into true geekology here, Black Ops definitely feels like a Treyarch game, but it builds itself on the foundation of Infinity Ward’s designs — even more than usual. While fine wine connoisseurs might be able to tell the difference between a 1999 and a 2007 pinot noir, first person shooter geeks can tell the difference in developers by the subtle differences. Medal of Honor and Call of Duty play very similarly, but most that have played both games would not mistake the two anymore than someone would confuse the gameplay of Halo for BioShock. The same is true for Infinity Ward and Treyarch’s shooters — albeit the differences are subtle.

Treyarch’s games tend to move at a slightly more frantic pace than IW’s, both online and off. There is also a different feel to the guns, both in the way they sound and recoil, not to mention the damage they deliver. The level design is also set differently for a different pacing, and little things like the damage grenades do are also slightly different. It isn’t a good or bad thing, just a signature, or a style, like two bands playing the same song. Black Ops is not Modern Warfare 3, but it is a worthy alternative that takes enough from its predecessor to justify replacing it.

The competitive multiplayer is essentially identical to the previous games in terms of gametypes. The standard multiplayer deathmatches and objective-type games are all present, as is the new wager mode.

Wager mode is perhaps the most obvious addition to the Call of Duty franchise, but the most significant might be the CoD points. When you play through a game, you earn experience points to level up, as always. In addition to those experience points, you also gain CoD points, which are earned both from completing challenges and simply from time spent playing. These points are used to unlock items and add-ons, including weapons, camouflage and killstreaks.

When you reach a pre-determined level you usually unlock an item like a new weapon. But now with the CoD points, you unlock the weapon but still need to purchase it with those points in order to equip it. While at first that might seem like you are doubling the amount of work, it can also lead to a far better level of personal customization. In Modern Warfare 2, if you wanted to create a silent class, you needed to wait until you reached the level to unlock the proper perks, then you needed to complete the weapon challenges to earn a suppressor. Now with the CoD points, you can unlock only the things you want and either save up for things you will have access to later, or simply spend them on things like killstreaks rewards, which you can now also customize to your preference. The more you play it, the more you will feel how deep it goes, and people who love prestige will likely find this a huge boon to keep the game feeling fresh.

The wager mode is an entirely new game type that also uses these CoD points, but it does so by having you gamble them. When you enter a wager mode, you bet the CoD points, and when the game ends, the top three players of the round are awarded those points. There are four different types of wager games: “One in the Chamber”, where every player has a single bullet (and you earn more by killing an opponent), their melee attack, and three lives. “Sticks and Stones” starts you with a crossbow, a ballistic knife and a tomahawk only. “Sharp Shooter” randomly selects the weapon you have, then changes it after a set period of time. “Gun Game”, arguably the best of the bunch, starts everyone with a pistol, and for each kill you are awarded a more powerful gun—the winner is the first to advance through 20 levels of weapons.

With the competitive and somewhat aggressive nature of the Call of Duty community, the wager matches should appeal to fans of the series. Even better, the next time you get taunted by a mouthy 13-year old kid with a vocabulary of racism, just challenge him to a wager match and take his lunch money.

The levels are varied, but there is something for everyone. The detail to each map is fairly incredible in parts, and the majority of the levels will have several paths to take, on multiple levels.  Snipers will be able to find areas to hunt, while close combat fans can haunt the tight corners, leaving the mid range players to act as a balance.

Treyarch has always excelled at map design. Where Infinity Ward tended to make maps that conformed to a similar style—generally a large area with three major ways to go from side to side and multiple paths leading off those three main paths, Treyarch’s maps tend to be more varied. Again, that isn’t really a good or bad thing but some people might prefer one style over the other, and Black Ops maps naturally conform more to the Treyarch style than the Infinity Ward design.

There is one issue with the multiplayer that some will like and others will despise. In what seems to be an attempt to keep the game moving quickly and offset campers, the spawning is unpredictable. You will frequently have people appear behind you, and you yourself will might suddenly find yourself surrounded by enemies. It seems like a deliberate plan by Treyarch to speed the games up, but expect complaints.

As with all heavily online games, and Call of Duty especially, if something is off balance, there will likely be a patch. So while a few things stood out as mismatched — certain guns being more powerful than others and things like that — Treyarch knows its community, and you can expect any balance issues to be corrected.

Beyond that, if you have played a Call of Duty game online, then you know what to expect. The gameplay is as good as it gets, and the games are fairly evenly balanced. There is a steep learning curve for new players, but the addition of a practice mode– where you can play the online game with AI-controlled bots filling in for online players — helps. The gun selection is robust, as are the add-ons and perks. Little inclusions like camouflage and adding tags to your weapons are nice touches, but in general it is the same game that millions of people play, just new and shinier.

Brains!

Making the trip over from the World at War online is also the zombie mode, a co-op scenario where you and up to three other people fight off waves of zombies. There are three game modes, the first is set in a theater, while the second and third are played with special guest characters in unique locations. No spoilers here, it is worth the surprise.

The zombie mode is something more of a diversion than a genuine addition to the online game, but it is a great diversion, and one that you will keep coming back to. Assuming more maps are released as DLCs, the zombie mode should continue to be a small, but well-played piece of the game.

Conclusion

Call of Duty: Black Ops lives up to the hype — at least as any game that has ads with Kobe Bryant, custom Jeeps worth $35,000, and a fanbase in the millions could. It builds on what worked with all the previous entries, Treyarch and Infinity Ward alike, and gives enough to be fresh, while retaining the core elements and keeping itself familiar.

A few technical glitches including wacky AI and unclear mission objectives mar the game, and while the online is fun, it is nothing new.  Treyarch may be an innovator, but it doesn’t invent.  If you have never been a fan of the Call of Duty series, or just hated World at War, Black Ops is unlikely to win you over.

Black Ops is a moody and mature game with a campaign that is strong enough to make the game a hit, but when added with a polished multiplayer, the game becomes one of the best values of the year. Expect to be playing Black Ops for a long, long time- at least until we see what the next Call of Duty has to offer.

Score: 9 out of 10

Showing 117 comments

  1. sboyd at 1:13pm 23rd February 2011 I think the game is ok but I do not believe one bit that it lived up to the hype. It's no match to MW2's game play nor graphics. Maybe I've been spoiled after playing such games as the uncharted series or the Army of Two series, who's graphics, in my opinion, are unmatched. Game play, it's kind of hokey, jumpy and not impressive for this day in age of gaming. My biggest complaint of the game, there is no cover strafing. WTF. Why can't I duck behind cover and shot from there. I could in both MW1 and MW2, as I recall. I had high hopes for this game and so looked forward to playing it but sadly, I've been let down and sorely disappointed. But I regress, I'll play the game, try to enjoy it for what it is, mediocre, in my opinion. Do I believe it's worth the $70 price tag, no I do not. I hope if there's a new installment in this series that they take lessons from Naughty dog and Electronic arts when it comes to game play and graphics and story.
  2. anouk101 at 2:12am 8th February 2011 I personally loved the game, I mean the graphics may not be the best, but the storyline and the online play far outweigh this minor problem. BTW if you're wondering whether to get black ops or mw2, I would definitely get black ops (better online play, better storyline, better guns). Want Call of Duty Black Ops? Click on the link and get OVER 50% OFF! http://gamerzkinect.blogspot.com/2010/12/awesome-...
  3. Anon at 5:03pm 14th January 2011 not sure if i believe this review was 100% objective...the claim that "snipers can find areas to hunt" gave it away. no one can snipe in this game. treyarch took the right approach to this game but executed it badly. the more balanced weaponry is nice, but its riddled with bugs that have been ignored for far too long, e.g. buying weapons only to find that the game refunded you your COD points for some reason. the physics are also poor; movements are choppy and too many kills/near misses are very questionable. not sure who is behind this article, but i would say they certainly did sell a game with the call of duty name just to make a buck.
  4. Will at 5:06pm 9th January 2011 The only good thing about Black Ops is the zombie mode!
  5. Alan at 8:29am 8th January 2011 Game played in single player offline mode it is over in like 9 hours. Big waste of money After playing Far Cry and Far Cry 2 litteraly for weeks in single player mode. This was very disapointed to not be entertained for more then a day.
  6. Guest at 5:55pm 7th January 2011 I dont have the game,but i do have Mw2 and its addicting as hell,50% of people who comment say that the game sucks,so im not sure of buying it,but if this game is supposed to take place in the1960s,then how do they have Remote Controlled Cars,we went from military UAVs to kamakize remote control cars......
    1. daniel at 6:18pm 7th January 2011 trust me you should buy it the only reason they say that is because they obviously arent very good and cant accept that still the games is GREAT
  7. daniel at 4:57pm 7th January 2011 you all need to get over it in the beginning the words look kinda fuzzy cuz he is strapped to a freakin torture chair and its supposed to be that way the RC car is not that bad just dont be idiots and use it in the wide open and the maps make it so that camping for to long isnt really possible and the random respawn also helps so that people cant just wait at your normal respawn point and kill you right away
  8. Classified at 3:46pm 6th January 2011 I need to know.is the game really as bad as ive heard?i might get it but i want to make sure.so if it is not such a bother,can someone email me at brooks803@gmail.com,and tell me?
  9. leibrow at 10:46pm 4th January 2011 ive got it its the best !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  10. Guest at 6:12pm 2nd January 2011 My biggest issue with the game is that none of the weapons used were even being produced at the time-line in the game. 1961 and we've got an M4 with M203 and a red-dot sight?!? 1968 and we've got a Steyr AUG, FAMAS, holographic sights, etc.? This isn't a minor historic error. This series prided itself on historic accuracy with its weapons. Might as well do another WW2 game and have an F4 Phantom come in for a strafing run.
  11. Unknown at 7:26am 31st December 2010 The game for the PC sucks...........the Stream you have to load is complicated and doesn't give you any options to load other than this........if it wasn't a gift I would take it back for a refund immediately
  12. Unknown at 9:54pm 29th December 2010 I liked MW2 single player but i didn't really like the Multiplayer everything was fine except for the maps there was always 2 or 3 spots for a camper to hide and shoot you as soon as you walk in the door Black Ops had bad spawn zones the weapons to me were very good at aiming and i didn't see a problem the graphics were on par with MW2 I thought the best pat was the maps which had a few places to camp but not to many the weapons were not as good but if you looked at it they were Vietnam weapons so they were not all Modern so to me black ops is a solid 8 but if your not sure rent it and if you like it buy it or wait a year until the next Cod comes out
  13. Marko331 at 6:28am 29th December 2010 call of duty black ops is probably the best first person shooter video game i've ever played in my life. The Multiplayer is awesome, the campaign is epicly wicked, and the online first of all barely has no lag, you face people that played the game before you did, and it is like a real call of duty experience. Some people say that halo reach is ''better'' than black ops which is unfortunately not true. 1. they look like aliens for g**damn sakes. 2. how the f**k do you fly while your shooting somebody. 3. The multiplayer online is pure sh*t. Anyway, thats what i think about black ops and halo reach
  14. mew at 2:38am 28th December 2010 yea.....your all dumb, seriously, say its a failure say its this...say it lacks that, it just became one of the top selling products in entertainment history. Next to the film "Avatar" it has reached over 1 billion in sales. Think what you will but you CAN NOT HATE.
  15. guest at 9:28pm 27th December 2010 MW2 and COD BLACK OPS are different in ways MW2 was like all out war and nuke the enemy, and BLACK OPS is more of a behind enemy lines kind of thing so those who say the guns suck on BLACK OPS remember most of the story is during 1963 -1980 so guns were not as good as they were say now witch is what MW2 guns are and people say that there is lag and other things that MW2 didn't have that BLACK OPS does ( lag poor graf. ect) because it is made from different game makers and story lines are different BLACK OPS i'll admit that it is bad because of it is a guys past and thoughts and MW2 is missions of a solder .
  16. Guest at 3:19pm 27th December 2010 Just got the game for psp. To all you complainers: suck it up and grow a pair why don't cha? This is my first CoD game, haven't played any others. To a guy who hasn't played any of the other games, This is great. Graphics and sound are good. No lag for me when I play online. Migrating Hosts suck, i'll admit that. And to the person who said it takes 25 bullets to kill someone? Not if you aim.
  17. Stoner63 at 9:03am 27th December 2010 Mw2 was addictive but the perks made it so unbalanced that how good u were at aiming barely mattered against the guy u were tryin to kill. Black Ops/3Arc does a better job with maps, the storyline (which blew my mind), perks, and overall balance. IW loyalists really piss me off 'coz their close minded heads can't accept that 3arc build off of whatever ground IW broke. Just coz 3arc didnt break ground like MW, doesn't mean that Black Ops & w@w suck. Looking back, i had better memories playing zombies and BO's story while getting frustrated that this same dude keeps killing my team in MW2. MW 10/10. WAW 7.5/10. MW2 8/10. BO 9/10. Btw i loved all recent COD. Storylines except for waw which was ok.
  18. laaaaaser at 7:25pm 25th December 2010 noob noon noob noob noob
  19. kibazuchiha at 5:22pm 23rd December 2010 What I don't like,is the story line a bit. After playing CODMW2 Black opps is a step backwards. I don't like that the storyline is short i play alot but i know that story line is short. and the unlocks in online are abit complicated to get and most good guns from mw2 are not in black opps so yeah
  20. Frenchie at 8:54am 21st December 2010 (PC player) DO NOT BUY THIS GAME if you expect to play more than 2 online games in a row without crashing. Expect lag while facing enemies 1st time in each game. Expect contracts that are not working properly. If you contact Activision online support (phone support ONLY for single player) expect being led of false routes to take to fix the issues, they have no clue what they are talking about. After the last patch (Dec. 2010) I get less crashes but still do get some. This being said it seems PS3 users are even more upset as they started signing online petitions for full refund. Save you Xmas money, don't invest in this giant scam!!!
  21. jesse at 6:05pm 17th December 2010 so i need to know weather or not this game is actually worth buying. i sat here and read all the comments about it and im not sure what to do? buy it or just by METRO 2033 instead....
    1. GameReviews at 8:52am 18th December 2010 I recommend u rent it. I personally find it to be one of the best games out at the moment, but as u have read, opinions differentiate.
  22. steve at 8:49am 15th December 2010 Game play is fun............when it works. I don't know about xbox users or pc guys but for the ps3, it can be a real hassle at times. The game is constantly "freezing", or gets a connection interuption (quite often) and kicks you out. Very difficult to play multiplayer with all of your friends. Everytime 5 or 6 of us get together to play multiplayer, one or two of us end up getting kicked or one may end up on the opposite team. The glitches are very frustrating. Like I said, I like the game play when everything is working fine. Not a huge fan of the killstreaks though. I don't see any reason to have a spy plane and a blackbird, seems like the makers got a bit lazy. If it were not for all my buddies getting this game, I'd probably still be playing MW2.
  23. Danielfreddie at 10:07am 14th December 2010 Shoot, I take the game off anyabodues hand if you want?
  24. noah at 5:34am 14th December 2010 i dont hav it but most of my friends who hav it agree mw2 is a bit better
  25. Unknown at 11:36pm 8th December 2010 I say Black Ops and MW2 are equaled......................no never mind black ops is better.
  26. GAMER at 7:20am 6th December 2010 If a you know how to make a headshot,then all high-end shooting games are nothing but the same.
  27. James at 8:37pm 5th December 2010 MW2 was great. I expected the same if not better quality from black ops and it just isnt there. The graphics and movement seem almost cartoonish and the weird zoom limits the players vision and makes long shots very difficult.
  28. @TechBurrow at 5:10pm 5th December 2010 Good review, if anyone is looking for video game forums where you can discuss talk to others about black ops then check out TechBurrow.com http://www.techburrow.com
  29. Cory at 6:14am 29th November 2010 Buy Black Ops for a great price here. . . http://corya.gknu.com/shop/store/shop.php?k=black...
  30. CoD: Black Oops! at 2:06am 25th November 2010 There are some good editions to the franchise but overall the gameplay is so poor they are easily over looked. The game feels and plays like crap and is choppy to say the least. The knife kills are like swiping a feather at someone as there is no effect other then getting a kill and you can do this half the time with poor aim and other times whiff standing directly face to face, flip a coin. The perks need adjustment and having to do silly things to unlock the "pro" versions is down right infuriating. I can go forever on how much this game is lacking as there is a myriad of other thing but will leave it at this.
  31. CoD: Black Oops! at 2:06am 25th November 2010 "How do you get kills in this game? Aim 2 feet to the left..." Having to level up to unlock the ability to buy certain weapons is totally stupid, one or the other, having to do both is nonsense. I could care less if every gun was available from the start, I don't play this game to level up, this isn't an mmorpg... The options menu is a cluster **** with way too many menus and useless infomation in a complicated format where you just want to change load outs and view stats you are forced to sift through too many useless screens just to see your K/D ratio. The killstreaks are either pointless or done poorly. R/C car have a generic 3rd person view instead of a more realistic camera view, and chopper gunner give you a generic view that is incredibly too easy to rack up kills.
  32. CoD: Black Oops! at 1:58am 25th November 2010 Compared to MW2 multiplayer this game is garbage. Black Ops is definately a step down, where as MW2 could have benefitted with a few mere tweaks Black Ops is total crap published with a CoD title on it. Multiplayer: First off you can't even hear players firing 10 feet away from you let alone foot steps which removes a complete aspect of the gameplay entirely. How about the spawn points? They suck not even sure how to describe the total suckage of spawns but they completely suck to the point that i'm not even sure why they even have killstreaks in this game. The game sounds are horrible, guns sound like a Cuisine Art blender and granades are nothing more then samples of someone popping a balloon with a needle apparently. This game requires far less skill as the game will reward a kill for completely terrible aiming and some of the stand offs you'll encounter make no sense as you are practically 1 shot by a guy with a silenced uzi from 50 feet away with the sights aimed 3 feet to the side of you while firing off an M-16 directly between the eyes landing the first shot on kill cam but some how dying anways.
  33. Benegesserit at 1:15pm 23rd November 2010 I enjoy it. Campaign was excellent and the online play is ok. I'll get used to the differences, bad and good. It does seem like the graphics are toned down online, but i figured the game had to compensate for speed of play. There's an old saying in the video industry "Speed, quality, size. Pick two."; so i don't mind the lack of detail. I didn't experience any lag, but i have a 30mb connection and i project in 1080p @ 9'x6', so i'm sure if something was obviously off, i'd have noticed. Overall, fun, but i can see this getting old much faster than its predecessors. Cheers.
  34. Hawaii Nei at 9:56pm 22nd November 2010 I wish I would have read these reviews before paying for this crap game. Game play is clunky at best. Kill streaks suck. The guns are unimaginative It lags worse then mw2. Knife kills are crap. Semtex has no range. The maps aren’t bad, but the game play is so crappy it distracts from it. I think the only cool thing is you can revive a wounded comrade. All in all, this game is a dud.
    1. noah at 5:41am 14th December 2010 Thank u now il get mw2 instead. btw is w@w better then black ops
  35. RKraai10 at 2:18pm 21st November 2010 I was truly disappointed with the level of quality of Black Ops. I did expect that it may suck though, since Treyarch was behind it. I found Black Ops to be about the same level of crapiness as World at War. I definitely will be uninstalling and filing in the round file.
  36. Jack Lebaron at 11:53am 20th November 2010 THIS OUTFIT WILL NRVER $UCK ME OUT OF $60+ AGAIN, THIS GAME SUCKED.. THIS WAS VERY SAD....
  37. David Clark at 5:12am 19th November 2010 HI, few minutes of entertainment for you and interesting new way of marketing for your business. Click on link below or copy/paste in your browser.. <a href="http://link4best.com/index.php?l=SL2&v=JahdnOQ9XCA&D =WWW.LINK2BEST.COM" target="_blank">http://link4best.com/index.php?l=SL2&v=JahdnO..." target="_blank">=WWW.LINK2BEST.COM View and share banned commercial video ( really funny ) from YouTube " Bill Clinton and voodoo doll
  38. UK Rob at 7:38pm 18th November 2010 The story campaign is good and pretty intense but the graphics are too cartoony. The Multiplayer is poor compared to MW2 multiplayer. I think the Black Ops campaign is better but the MW2 mulitplayer is better. As I play the campaign once and the multiplayer every day so I will be going back to MW2 and trading Black Ops in.
  39. CoD at 6:52am 18th November 2010 MW2 was better with the graphics, but Treyarch is more about the gameplay. I love this game because it is the most evenly based gameplay i have ever seen in a CoD game! In MW2 u could just camp and get kills left and right well Treyarch makes it impossible to camp. MW2 overall was a failer in my opinion just mainly becuase of the Multiplayer and if u dont believe me u can see it for urself, so many campers, hackers, cheap kills, quick scoping kills, and noob kills. That was what made the game suck and i am so now a Treyarch fan :D there is a rumor since the hole issue b/w Infinty Ward and Activision and there break up that Treyarch might just go ahead and make MW3 :) I dont hate Infinity Ward but they could work on there gameplay. Last but not least if Infinity Ward made the graphics and if Treyarch made the gameplay u would have the best CoD game of all time :) thats what they should do for MW3
    1. HELLZIDUNNO at 7:15pm 21st November 2010 Exactly what about the gameplay makes you think it is better than MW2. Im waiting o thats right your just saying that try explaining why because i didnt see it that way. How about the slower game play including the light weight part of the perks u go like um a shade faster whats the point of that. Dont get me wrong some things i do like about it tho are the attack dogs and the rc car every one hates. I think those where good improvements but after that it goes to crap with the no party able to play together deal. The constant connection interuptions and laggs omg that really sucks. To top all that off some of the guns with good levels on them like the m16 really sucks last but not least there still is no reward for doing prestige wow a couple of titles cool not. How about unlocking a whole new class of guns after prestige and why u cant keep your cod points after you do it too.
  40. BlAcKoPsRuLeS at 7:17pm 16th November 2010 I think the game is awesome it leaves you thinking all of these questions and when you find out you are surprised and I think the graphics are really good also I like the kill streaks for online except for the stupid RC Car but thats probably because they keep finding me and blowing me up.
  41. Adam_Zed at 10:58pm 15th November 2010 I honestly don't know what you all are talking about. I have been a gamer all my life, and I love this game. It has some flaws, but the more I play it, the more I like it. The campaign was one of the best of the Call of Duty games, and the multiplayer is fun. Its different than MW2, but its still good. And the graphics are fine. They aren't Crysis, but they are better than Medal of Honor, which had serious issues.
  42. your mom stinks! at 3:34pm 15th November 2010 this is one of the best games i have ever played, why the heck would anybody say these graphics suck?!?!?!?!? If your TV sucks obvioulsy the gmaes grfx will suck too, seriously dont be a dumbass!! PS2 gett a dam brain you dumb piece of shit!!! MW2 is good but Black ops is amazing!! and btw this is black opps it has secret US intel that develops secret wepons that arent used on the battlefield!! it makes sense think about it faggot!!!
  43. joe at 12:32pm 15th November 2010 black ops is the worst game i have ever seen. thank you.
  44. Gurufreeiz at 7:29am 15th November 2010 I like the game but playing on PC was very buggy. Some cut scenes didn't play right all the time (the level where Mason finally escapes from that room and you end up getting knocked out by that guy from the interrogation) and I had to restart the level over to play it right. At the last level, after the helicopter crashes and you jump out, the FOV without looking through your sights is the same as if you are (Had to purposely die to correct it). I also saw some objects just floating and fly slowly through the air in some of the levels (the yellow gas canisters in the last level). It was also very slow on the PC compared to MW2 (Although I didn't see a huge difference in detail level between the 2 games). For MW2 I can play at mid detail settings while for Black Ops, I had to turn everything to low/off and set my graphics setting (outside the game) to the lowest settings. Even with that, it still ran slow.
  45. Terbo at 10:20pm 14th November 2010 This game is a bust! Going back to Battlefield Bad Company 2 now.
  46. Edward at 4:29pm 14th November 2010 90% of the people on hear say the game SUCKS including me! i will never buy a game developed by Treyarch again. It's a shame we will never get to see a call of duty game developed by infinity ward ever again!
    1. jakatt at 9:34am 30th December 2010 yea and the other 10 percent of the people here are actually good at call of duty, and arent stubborn slobs like your self
      1. daniel at 5:00pm 7th January 2011 i gotta agree with the other person who commented because they are right
  47. BizarreSubpar at 4:08pm 13th November 2010 What a shock, Call of Duty brings out the angry video game nerd. I thought the campaign was awesome and the online is alright, just takes a little getting used to. The lag sucks, but it doesn't happen as often as the nerds commenting make it sound. My advice? Sack the F up and get used to the online play rather than just say it sucks after less than a week.
    1. RANT ON RANT at 11:29am 23rd November 2010 to many people got used to MW2 being to easy
  48. justin at 3:00pm 13th November 2010 wow does this game blow or what. online sucks balls. how many shots does it take to get to the center of a human being? 25! yeah it takes 25! geez! you have to use an entire clip to kill someone. oh and i love how they blast your achievements and other crap right in the middle of your screen while your trying to shoot someone as if having to use 25 bullets to kill them didnt make it hard enough. yes i said 25
  49. Chris at 10:17am 13th November 2010 Hey I just wanted to thank Activision and Treyarch for their wonderful and fresh copy of Black Ops for PS2 I'm really enjoying the solid graphics, sounds and spawning. Please let me know when you start making games for the PS3 again would love to play them too.
  50. Jae at 11:33pm 11th November 2010 This game has cause me to rage more then Halo + COD: WAW COMBINED! Let me get starts. Reason this game sucks. (Multiplayer) 1. Spawn systems is probably the worst I seen. 2. RC-XD Cars? Really? Don't even want to get started about that. 3. Explosives are terrrableeeeeeeeeeee. I threw a semtex about 2 inch from someone, guess what? He LIVES. 4. The graphics is worst then COD4 which is from 3 years ago... 5. No "Tick" sound when someones defusing a bomb. 6. Sound isent as good. In Mw2, I could hear people's footsteps and knew where their at right away. This game? I can't even hear footsteps with my turtle beach. 7. Shot Gun's are terrable. I understand their not suppose to shoot 500 feet, but Tryarch made it so it can't 1 shot kill someone from 5 inch away. 8. Spawn sucks. 9. Some guns are wayyy over powered then others. 10. Did I mention this game had bad spawning system?
    1. BlAcKoPsRuLeS at 7:13pm 16th November 2010 technically you only have 7 reasons why this game is bad saying the same thing 3 times doesn't count as 10 reasons sorry.
    2. RANT ON RANT at 10:27am 23rd November 2010 Spawn sucks? Whats bad about the RC-XDs? If you threw a semtex and it was 2inches away from him it would probably stick on him... No tick sound when the bomb defuses...its a Tick, you must really rely on your headset... you know 5inches are like the width of your arm spawn sucks? some guns overpowered? MW2 didnt have any overpowered guns?WAW didnt have overpowered guns?CoD4 didnt have overpowered guns? you dont have overpowered guns in real life? spawn sucks? The spawns arent as bad as MW2 where the guy spawns behind you and they can get a 1 shot kill and a payback...
    3. GameReviews at 8:39am 18th December 2010 Alright, first of all, learn your grammar and spelling. Second of all, spawn systems are much better than mw2, however i will agree that they Aren't top notch. Furthermore, explosives are realistic now. Before they would kill u on the other side of a wall. Now at least I can say that it is possible that it would have killed him from there. Also, the graphics were taken directly from mw2, so suck on that hater. Also, instead of hearing an unrealistic tick, u hear the numbers being punched in. Footsteps no longer sound like you are stepping on a microphone. Shotguns now have slightly less god range. Also, shotguns are based on the spray of the bullet, which is realistic. In the over call of Duties the shotgun damage was based on direction. The spawning, again, is ten trillion times better than mw2. Agreed, some guns are slightly OP, but nothing compares he the UMP45 or the Thumper/noob tube from mw2. All in all this game deserves at least an 8/10. Granted, it has it's mistakes, but no game is perfect.
    4. guest at 9:31am 30th December 2010 someone camped a lot in MW2...
  51. kLPantera at 10:11am 11th November 2010 Call of Duty Black Ops is a good game. Stop hating on the graphics and laggy server connections. Sure the graphics can use a little bit of improvement however, don't even begin to hate on the maps. Modern Warfare 2 maps had to many areas where those who 'cannot' play the game sit and camp. What Treyarch did was make it harder to camp with their new maps. They also made the game more realistic, so stop whining about how it does not meet up to your 'standards'. Maybe you just need to get better.
    1. Marsonis at 5:04pm 30th November 2010 hahahah first game I played I camped in one spot and went 22-1 as long as your on high ground there are plenty of spots to camp what are you talking about....
  52. OldCoot at 10:44am 11th November 2010 WOW....did you actually try playing the game on line. lets see for $60 we get around 6 hours of single player then go on line and get horrible server lag and dropped service. If you review this game as 9 out of 10 you need a new line of work.
  53. stu at 3:08am 11th November 2010 this game is a remake of w@w no thought has gone into it every server is laggy as hell the graphics are not a patch on mw2 tryeach live the fps to someone who knows what they are doing ever cod u have made sux theres free fps online that are far better than this garbagge
  54. matt at 1:42am 11th November 2010 Great game...stop being MW2 fanboys...get off infinity wards jock lol
    1. giaka at 12:00pm 11th November 2010 Agree 100%. Makes me wonder if they know what a good game is? I am willing to bet anyone who is a MW2 fan boy also hangs from the jockstrap of the master chief (I hate HALO).
    2. marsonis at 5:01pm 30th November 2010 your argument makes no sense this is a Call of Duty game EVERY Call of Duty game is compared to the previous one released before it dont be upset because your precious Treyarch failed to release a game that was better than infinity wards im gonna laugh when the final figures come in and this game only does half as good as MW2 did and activision is forced to go back and kiss infinity wards feet. Sorry junior thats the way business works if you release a product thats xactly the same as a game you release 2-3 yrs ago dont be upset when people call you out for it..
    3. jakatt at 9:29am 30th December 2010 agreed, to many ignorant people read this review
  55. MrNiceGuy at 11:17pm 10th November 2010 I think call of duty black ops game sucks. The game play is slow and the on-line multi-player looks like crapppp! Sound of the game is ok overall it sucks. Im trading the game already?
    1. Unknown at 7:27am 31st December 2010 I agree 100%
  56. BADMOFO at 6:50pm 10th November 2010 The game's graphics aren't too bad, the maps are interesting and not boring. The multiplayer game is SLOW you cannot kick ass like you can in MW2 and I agree the kill streaks are stupid. I do however like the addition of flame throwers and crossbows now I can light you suckers on fire!
  57. johhny flynn at 1:10pm 10th November 2010 looks more like a office buidling....troll..keep playing it....deep down inside you like it
    1. Andrew Beehler at 2:46pm 10th November 2010 It is.....You don't have an xbox at your office?
  58. mowenover at 11:31am 10th November 2010 Whats your address
    1. Andrew Beehler at 11:47am 10th November 2010 111 SW 5th Ave. Suite 1000 Portland OR, 97204
      1. mowenover at 12:09pm 10th November 2010 k wait 5 to 7 business day
        1. bevolatte88 at 3:23pm 11th November 2010 i wanted the game :(... even though it sucks ...
      2. jordan at 6:25am 16th November 2010 Tell me if you actually get it because that would be awesome
      3. marsonis at 4:54pm 30th November 2010 Im sending you dog %*$ in a box enjoy you tool!!!
    2. ore masta at 11:51am 10th November 2010 :>
  59. mowenover at 9:31am 10th November 2010 The game F--KING sucks. Online play is terrible. The graphics are crappy. They made everything smaller. I cant even read the clan names or the names of the guys when they die, and im playing on a 50''. these guys suck at making a game. they will never compare to infinity ward. If anybody is looking to buy the game, i have one for sell. F--K it ill pay you to take it. p.s. advise to all who have not bought the game, save your money and rent it first. Its not worth buying, its almost not even worth renting.
    1. Andrew Beehler at 10:25am 10th November 2010 I'll take your game - how much are you willing to pay me to take it?
      1. mowenover at 10:56am 10th November 2010 well right now its under the leg of my coffee table keeping the table level.
        1. Andrew Beehler at 11:01am 10th November 2010 So, you were really just ranting, but don't actually hate the game enough to give it up? Figures......
  60. rajesh at 9:04am 10th November 2010 The game call of duty is realistic game with thunder storms.The weapons are big enough to strike the enemies and the type of weapons is important to move soldiers to attack.The game cold war is graphically fantastic and the grenades are used to destroy the enemy area is realistic.There are multiplayer games available also.
  61. JONATHAN at 7:54am 10th November 2010 i think the game grafics arent good they need improvment after that all is good
  62. It is not MW3... at 7:35am 10th November 2010 Nice review. Enjoying the game so far. It plays pretty well and the multiplayer is ok. Though it doesnt seem to match players based on rank in the slightest. Me being a rank 1 this morning up against a team of people in the high forties. Thats my only quibble so far. Too many people expect this to be MW3 thats why they hate it. There are plenty of guns, plenty of attachments, the credit system is quite a lot like Halo:Reach, have to save credits to buy the things you want etc. Overall wouldn't put it as high as a 9/10 yet, but i havent completed it. Solid 7-7.5/10 so far. Kill steaks are fine, what are you complaining about ajroo, Dog pack is just as realistic as any other Kill streak there has been. Addition of things like rolling thunder and napalm strike are decent as well.
  63. Colter at 7:54am 10th November 2010 i love the game i played for hours yesterday. yes there are a few downfalls but over all the game is amazing!! and zombies is the best thing in the world. The online play is good too. wager maches are so cool. so i give it a A
  64. guest at 5:54am 10th November 2010 Very disappointed. Multiplayer options "off line" are gone. All this wait for nothing.Bring it back today!
    1. thedude87 at 3:50pm 7th January 2011 i love ops that jail place took me 10 minutes
  65. wil_i_am_not at 4:44am 10th November 2010 I Agree Wit @ajroo
  66. @ajroo at 2:51am 10th November 2010 Im sorry but BLACK OPS is a step backward. The multiplayer seems like it came out in 2006 and plays much less smoothly or well as Modern Warfare 2. I keep trying to let it grow on me and i hate it more each time i play. The maps all feel the same to me, the weapons response is weird and reminds me of a much older game. The killstreaks are HORRIBLE. Dog Pack!?? SERIOUSLY?!?! And that stupid RC car...i thought it would be cool but when there are 5 roaming around the map at any one time, its just annoying and incredibly stupid. It seems like there are a lot less guns and im not digging the progression by buying attachments and perks. Overall, its not a game that would have made me an addict like Modern Warfare 2. I will be back playing the old game tomorrow and for a long time. Maybe Infinity Ward will make a Modern Warfare 3, until then, Black Ops is absolutely a disappointment...one in which i will finish the single player campaign, and be put on the shelf next to MAG to collect dust.
    1. colter at 6:57am 10th November 2010 Infinity Ward is done. they kind of broke up like a band. the main people that made mw2 are not there anymore. i herd they might be going to EA so you could see a good game coming from them in the next couple of years.
    2. Marsonis at 4:51pm 30th November 2010 Reason it feels that way ajroo is cuz this is nothing but a recycled version of WaW I couldnt agree with you more this felt like a game I had played 2-3 yrs ago you hit the nail on the head
    3. ......... at 10:06pm 30th November 2010 I really agree plus the perks some perk u need to do exaggerated things to unlock the pro one of example marthon pro its achivements are weird and i prefer making the ranger or spetnaz run 52 miles i think for marathon pro thats much easier i mean for my point of view but i kinda like the campaign story.....
  67. MOHA at 2:02am 10th November 2010 The looks great. I used to play COD:Mordern warfare but this looks very better to me. good graphics. Overall, this look like a good review
  68. Lijo at 1:10am 10th November 2010 If we considering graphical features Black ops in a very high level.After including the multilayer feature the game is very interesting and the background sounds also very thrilling.Actions also very perfectly managed.But I think the game is not fast enough.
  69. preethi at 12:53am 10th November 2010 the game is quite good. But the game is missing the thrill. i got bored of playing the war games
  70. Dumitru Iulia at 12:41am 10th November 2010 Uuum sounds really great! Great story, great graphics . I really like it!
  71. Ari at 11:12pm 9th November 2010 I am really disappointed. Thought the game would be at least as good as MW-2 if not better but it seems like you are playing it on PS2. Character animations, sounds, weapons look, graphic details are all at best less then mediocre. Through the 3 rd mission, I lost interest and gave up. The game makers did a huge mistake not giving the contract to the developers who made MW and MW2. I am returning the game tomorrow. My grade C-
    1. obed at 11:45pm 9th November 2010 I agree with you the game feels like is too slow, just like World at War.
    2. Adam_Zed at 11:45pm 9th November 2010 To each their own, but I thought the game looked and sounded bad ass.
    3. giaka on XBOX Live at 11:56am 11th November 2010 Am I the only one where that found MW2 online play (XBOX) to be complete and utter garbage? In my opinion IW blew it out their buts with MW2. They did a top notch job on MW1 and then went all crazy with HALO like BS and ruined MW2. I find BO a refreshing change form the crap that we have had to deal with in regards to MW2 online. Why IW cant climb down from their horse and use some of the ideas from Treyarch is beyond me. Treyarch did a fantastic job with this game and I hope they change very little if anything with the online play (until the 9 year olds find glitches anyway). the game is close enough to perfect that any changes may ruin it. Sorta like the sniper patch ruined sniping in MW1.
      1. CP Irish on XBOX at 4:19pm 15th November 2010 Are you serious GIAKA??? You think Black Ops is better then MW2??? I guess your not a real gamer because 1st of all the graphics suck and the sound is horrible. Treyard's World at War is just the Black Ops, the only difference is that the weapons are a little bit more up to date. Why is Black Ops horrible: 1. Graphics suck 2. Overall sound is horrible 3. Scaling of the map vs character is horrible 4. Lag 5. Host Migration sucks 6. Hit indicators/registers are off- your better off hip firing then actually aiming 7. The kill streaks are weak-who really cares about calling in a valkyrie missle (that missle is 10 times harder to control then a Predator Missle in MW2) or calling in a Sam's Turret (once you plant this Turret down, you have to protect it or its going to be destroyed by the first knife or from the first bullet from a weapon). 8. Respawn locations are horrible too (sometimes enemies respawn on top of other enemies)
        1. simon at 6:09am 19th November 2010 get a life
          1. sboyd at 1:56pm 23rd February 2011 You have a bad attitude. These are his opinions and quite frankly they match mine exactly about this game. We are all aloud to our opinion and it's mine that you're a...... I'll leave that up for interpretation.
        2. SamuraiGerbil at 2:37pm 20th November 2010 1. Get a better TV. stop playing on your old boob tube. 2. get a better surround surround system. cause the game sounds amazing. 3. scaling is "ok" at best, not horrible. 4. I have almost no lag. 5. I'll agree with that 6. If i am aiming down my sight and i pull the trigger it kills the guy. stop complaining. learn to aim better, it works. 7. And I'm guessing you thought the Tactical Nuke was a good killstreak? If you don't like the Valkyrie, /Gasp don't use it. 8. Respawns are not as bad as you say they are. Yes it sucks sometimes but it stops the spawn campers. You honestly find any excuse you can, to hate on Treyarch. This is there big shot and i think they did an amazing job. ps. and before you decide to hate on me, I love MW2, it's one of my favorite games. But stop being a whiny bitch because IW isn't making the MW games anymore. Learn to love Treyarch or stop playing Call of Duty.
      2. CP irish on XBOX at 4:19pm 15th November 2010 Why are you adding Halo in this blog, first of Halo is produce by Bungie not IW or Treyarch??? Totally 2 different game types. Seriously Giaka I don't think you would know a real first person shooter game if it came out bit you in the rear. MW2 by far is better then Black Ops, sound wise and graphic wise....
        1. chris123451 at 1:47pm 20th December 2010 your an idiot, this quote "Medal of Honor and Call of Duty play very similarly, but most that have played both games would not mistake the two anymore than someone would confuse the gameplay of Halo for BioShock" ok now that you read that maybe now you will see wut he was talking about retard
      3. HELLZIDUNNO at 6:51pm 21st November 2010 You cant be serious this game really blew it with the online play its horrible. Why you ask? Well this is why 1. The whole non camping issue is rediculous if u dont like camping why have sniper rifles in the first place 2. The spawning really sucks u die and respawn to a point where u will die at least 2-3 times easily 3. The maps are horrible i mean the only good one is nuketown which is in need of more places to hide especially when every one knows where your going to spawn. 4. They still havn't fixed the over powered guns and whats with the sillencer actually making your gun stronger 5. The biggest peice of crap part is the perks and getting the pros on them i mean seriously some people dont play capture the flag and demolition or care to play it and your forcing them to play it to unlock perks Overall MW2 was hands down a better game graphics wise gameplay online the guns perks all leveled eachother out ooohh i forgot what happened to the kniffing or commando mode then they add the blackbird for what you have a spy plane already it makes no sence.
        1. chris123451 at 1:45pm 20th December 2010 wow this is the dumbest post ive ever seen, u are obviously not very good at Call of duty games. first off i will say i agree i liked MW2 online better than BO, however your issues with it are ridiculous. ill just go down your list. 1. most people camp with weapons other than sniper rifles. 2. the spawning is the same as every other COD game, there will always be a few matches where a few enemies get in and u get spawn killed a few times. 3. thats just ignorance to say all maps suck, and y are you asking for more hiding spots on nuketown, sound like a big camper to me. 4. what guns are overpowered, there are some that suck but most are decent, and the silencer thing is bs. 5. the only thing i agree with the perks/perk system are not very good. btw i am 9th prestige on WAW, 10th on MW2 and currently 5th on BO with a 2.05 kdr so i know what i am talking about
      4. Marsonis at 4:44pm 30th November 2010 Rofl considering that this game wont beat MW2 in sales I would that will prove that it was infinity ward not treyarch that appeals to most gamers in terms of what they want but to answer your original question..yes your one of a handle full of people who ive heard make negative critics of MW2. I had to laugh when you said that BlOps was a refreshing change from MW...really...apparently you never played WaW because this is basically a slight upgrade over that game which came out what 2 yrs ago...and guess which company made WaW...wait for it...*gasp* Treyarch...in 2 yrs they didnt even update their system at all the single player story had potential but ultimately will be forgotten rather quickly and the multiplayer on this game is abyssmal the only thing that I will give them credit for is the wager match system which was a brilliant idea other than that im going back to playing MW2...
    4. tim webb at 4:19pm 25th November 2010 I am returning mine. I wish they could figure out that a 2 player game should be played as 2 going through the game side by side fighting the enemies. Instead they call it 2 player but you have to go against each other in stupid stuff like king of the hill, and caputer the flag. What the F--- is that!! COME ON. I want some one to have my back going through the game itself. I played 1 player and my guys just let people run by and are not any help they get in the way more than anything.. Plus way way way to much in movie mode instead of playing time. Very disappointed that after last game they did the same stupid move with not having 2 players going through the game itself side by side.
    5. adkboy at 9:10am 6th January 2011 i agree with u. i got the game and gave it a way a week latter.they could have did so much better
  72. Arturo Angel Cabrera at 10:18pm 9th November 2010 I think you meant "Brains!" Other than that, great article.
    1. Ryan Fleming at 10:21pm 9th November 2010 Thanks, and updated.
Close Suggestion GoldenEye 007 (Wii) Review
View Article