Glorious Mission

A new military training video game pits Chinese forces against the US.

Video game violence never fails to garner more attention than it deserves, but a new title called Glorious Mission has become something of a controversy. The game comes from PLA, which is not an acronym for a development firm but instead the People’s Liberation Army of China. The PLA collaborated with Wuxi Giant Interactive Group to create the game which pits Chinese soldiers against their main opposition, the US military.

Glorious Mission (also known as Mission of Honor) is being used a training tool for PLA recruits treads on some dangerous territory by piquing U.S. concerns of nationalism and anti-American sentiments. Using video games for military training methods is nothing new; in 2008 the U.S. Army invested $50 million to develop games for combat preparation. What’s raising eyebrows with Glorious Mission is the choice to focus on American troops as China’s primary enemy.

“The game, with a soldier’s personal story in the military camp as the background and participating in a large-scale actual-troop confrontation drill code-named ‘Glorious Mission’ as the main line, is divided into three parts including basic training, individual soldier’s task and squad/team confrontation. In squad/team confrontation part, 32 soldiers can log on at the same time to start confrontation combat according to the rules in selected scenes,” says the PLA Daily [translation via ChinaMil and China Daily].

According to the report, the Chinese military has made use of training via video games before, but the software was often developed by companies outside of the country. The PLA wanted to create a game closer to home in order to instill Chinese values and avoid any elements that could “mislead Chinese army officers and soldiers.”

Military games of this variety have been accused of being tinted with propaganda, something America’s Army was not immune to. The game, introduced in 2002, was said to further the US military agenda and has been called the best recruitment tool for our armed forces. Many have criticized such games for capitalizing on the “Xbox mindset,” which claims that these cause potential and current soldiers to distort the very harrowing reality of war as if it were a video game.

And now Glorious Mission is subject to these same criticisms, except that it specifically focuses on an enemy, versus similar games that feature various opponents. But will this unsubtle hint have any effect? The saturation of first person shooters might make gamers immune to developing ill-will toward any particular adversary.

Check out a video of Glorious Mission to see the game in action.

Showing 26 comments

  1. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya at 10:39am 21st May 2011 Nothing wrong with that. "America's Army" - made 100% by US army and they use it to train and build combat skill. Why not PLA ? But what matters most is gameplay and graphics, I would pass it if it looks crappy.
  2. codychaosx at 10:46am 19th May 2011 Considering our country is trillions of dollars in debt and about 80% of that debt is to the chinese.I would be pretty worried. And think about most of americas popular shooter games.we are always put against arabs and I hate to say it most americans dislike the people in the middle east.
  3. Adam Hughes at 3:18pm 19th May 2011 Does the game end with shanghai being nuked? Just testing the realism....
  4. one evil chef at 10:54pm 18th May 2011 Okay, couple points picked up: 1.) Chinese making a game portraying china vs. us. US is not sure how to approach this. 2.) US is wondering if marking us as an enemy is bad, yet multi-player games already do this if you get put on the opposing side. 3.) US wonders if soldiers/gamers in the asian market will play this and hate the USA. Gamers and soldiers today already play games like that and havent shown favoritism towards team nationality. Knowing this, the US needs to share an open mind about referrences in modern culture, moving to block such culture told from a new perspective violates free speech rights in the USA. Live long and prosper, and keep thar open mind.
    1. Wasteland Wanderer at 8:38am 19th May 2011 Yes, MULTIPLAYER games. But in those games you can still play as US forces. In this, we are JUST the enemy; we are portrayed as THE BAD GUYS. The Chinese are essentially instilling the notion in those that play this game that killing American soldiers is OKAY. They are preparing their citizens for the possibility of fighting a war with the United States! I just hope I'm lucky enough to make it to a Vault once the ICBMs start flying... or at least become a ghoul after they hit. Because ghouls are awesome.
      1. egotrippin at 7:55am 21st May 2011 stop whining... in nearly every shooter game on the planet you play as Americans and kill all kinds of other factions includiing Chinese, Russians, various Arabs etc... and its perfectly fine. But the people in other countries do not complain that they are portrait as the bad guys... they know how self-loving the Americans are and that they alsways have to be that good guys.
        1. Wasteland Wanderer at 6:36pm 27th May 2011 (There's someone wrong on the internet!) First of all, learn to distinguish "whining" as you put it, and "panic". Or are you just trolling, "egotrippin"? Second, not "nearly every shooter" is funded or created by the MILITARY for the purpose of being a blatant TRAINING TOOL (did you not catch that part in the article? Or did you just skip down to the comments?). That was my primary concern, which I apparently didn't make clear enough in my initial post. And btw, are you playing many shooters now days? Because it sounds like you've only played Modern Warfare and Homefront, both of which I'm fairly certain were not funded by the US military to be used as training tools. And I find that there are by far more shooters that have fictitious villains (mercenary groups, criminal organizations, aliens, ZOMBIES, demons, etc) or are set in current/past conflicts, or are set in the future (or distant-ish future). Oh, and one last thing, "...people in other countries do not complain that they are portrait as the bad guys"? Uh huh, look, just because YOU haven't heard people from other countries complaining, "egotrippin" (what an accurate name), that doesn't that there aren't people doing so. For instance, there were plenty of Japanese who were a little upset at the prospect of players being able to flamethrowers on Japanese soldiers in Call of Duty World at War. And as it just so happens, that game is actually BANNED in Japan. So please, get your facts straight before you start talking out your ass. Now, I've wasted far too much time and energy on you; I have to go finish building my Vault (which I will fill with beautiful women and cases upon cases of booze) for when the nuclear war between the US and China finally occurs, just as Fallout 3 accurately predicted it would! (Sarcasm)
          1. US of Assholes at 3:42am 9th July 2011 Just shut up United States of Assholes.
  5. gamer4freedom at 8:24pm 18th May 2011 Wow the tables are turning. America trade in your guns for an xbox and it will all be ok.
  6. yogdogz at 5:18pm 18th May 2011 lawl.. finally I can play against USA in this game..
  7. Arch Aznable at 12:01am 19th May 2011 LOL Its nothing new I better be off playing Command and Conquer Generals Zero Hour than this FPS gonna be on the US side and conquer China oh wait ... Made in China ... damn were doomed :D
  8. Stan Twotimes at 11:26pm 18th May 2011 release it here ill pop a cap in their ass.
  9. Geoff Suttor at 10:36pm 18th May 2011 Gold, such an entertaining thread, the splatter of indignation from the aggogant I like the best. This will sell 100mil alone in China, very smart move.
  10. Russell IncrediBowl Gibbs at 10:31pm 18th May 2011 Shud b an easy game then seen as the dumb yanks allways shoot there own men when in war.
  11. Robert Eli Taylor at 10:20pm 18th May 2011 Of course they are. Why wouldn't you want to train against the best in the world? I guarantee you that our military does. If your making some big deal out of this then you are stupid.
  12. Michael Hookano at 10:10pm 18th May 2011 What is this? How about putting real americans against those Chinese? Sign me up to wipe the virtual floor with them.
  13. Scotty Quill at 9:46pm 18th May 2011 All is fair in love and war! No doubt the media will turn this into a frenzy...
  14. Ilya D at 9:42pm 18th May 2011 I don't see what the big deal is, it's not like American video games haven't let us fight the Chinese for years... why wouldn't they do the same?
  15. Okay Altinisik at 9:41pm 18th May 2011 Trump called them motherfuckers, its only fair to be the enemy in a videogame
  16. Peter Egler at 9:39pm 18th May 2011 Well, The Gaming Industry and the Movie industry tell us often what is AHEAD... and not only what is history already.
  17. Chris Johnson at 9:36pm 18th May 2011 So if you play as the Chinese versus the U.S does that mean you can't ever win?
  18. Wil Newman at 9:35pm 18th May 2011 All I can say is that it is only fair !!!
  19. Ian Ward at 9:34pm 18th May 2011 What do you expect ? They have been preparing for war for a long time.
  20. Tom Pajak at 9:33pm 18th May 2011 all is fair in love and war..i say big deal.......we'd be hypocrites if we denounce this
  21. Xander Burns at 9:25pm 18th May 2011 makes a change
  22. Dallas Neighbors at 9:24pm 18th May 2011 Who's the first congressman trying to ban this game going to be? I vote Lieberman
Close Suggestion Microsoft replacing Xbox 360s damaged by disc update
View Article