Blizzard has announced that Diablo 3 is making some major changes, making a Q1 release extremely doubtful.

It looks like fans of Diablo III will have to wait a little longer for the game to hit shelves. Try to act surprised. But really, it’s already been 12 years, what’s a few more months/years/decades?

The thing that makes this delay especially troubling is the amount of work that Blizzard suggests still needs to be done. Typically, when a game is delayed for technical reasons (as opposed to marketing reasons) it is just a matter of fixing glitches and polishing a few things—and that is for games that have had development cycles closer to 2-3 years than the 12 years that Diablo 3 has had. This delay actually sounds like a major overhaul of a few of the game’s core systems.

On Battle.net, Diablo III’s game director Jay Wilson explained the reason for the delay, and highlighted what work still needs to be done.

“While working on Diablo III we’ve been called out for messing around with systems too much, that the game is good as-is and we should just release it. I think that’s a fair argument to make, but I also think it’s incorrect. Our job isn’t just to put out a game, it’s to release the next Diablo game,” Wilson posted. “No one will remember if the game is late, only if it’s great. We trust in our ability to put out a great game, but we’re not quite there yet. In addition to finishing and polishing the content of the game we’re continuing to iterate on some of the core game systems.”

Many of the changes Wilson lists are relatively minor—identifying objects will be quicker and easier (the Scrolls of Identification are gone), and the developer is introducing a dedicated potion button for example. The customization system is also being cleaned up, and things like the “Mystic artisan,” which Wilson claims just wasn’t adding anything, will be removed. That may change in future DLCs, but for now it is gone.

But once you begin to pull the thread, it is hard to stop it from unraveling. Along with the somewhat minor changes above (in the sense that they just need to be reworked in the coding), Blizzard is also reconsidering some of the core systems. The biggest changes will be with the skill and rune systems, but for now Wilson is keeping those under wraps.

Blizzard will also be reworking the strength, dexterity, intellect, and vitality of each character class, and defense, attack, and precision have also been dropped as attributes. These are not just minor tweaks, but fundamentally change the balance of the characters. Some of the display menus will also be changed, including character stats will now be visible in the inventory interface. All of which is going to take time.

Those that played the beta will also notice in the final game that the Cauldron of Jordan and Nephalem Cube have both been removed. The Stone of Recall has also been renamed the Town Portal, which makes the items obsolete.

Considering the game is—or was—scheduled for a Q1 release (Best Buy even announced a February 1 release date, which Blizzard quickly denied), the amount of work that apparently needs to be done is significant. The Q1 release date is almost certainly out of the question now, and there is even a chance that a 2012 release is in jeopardy.

Still, for as frustrating as the delays may be for fans, Wilson is right—people will forget the delays as long as the game is solid. You have to give Blizzard credit for standing by its guns and deciding to make major changes, under what must certainly be incredible pressure to deliver the game. In a day when most developers are happy with releasing a title and issuing patches to fix any issues, it is laudable that Blizzard is waiting until it is happy before releasing the game.

On the other hand, it has been 12 freaking years.

“Our hope is that by embracing our iterative design process in which we question ourselves and our decisions,” Wilson said, “Diablo III won’t just live up to our expectations, but will continue to do so a decade after it’s released.”

 

Showing 21 comments

  1. LawDG at 12:43pm 25th January 2012 You mean, everybody isnt surprised that it got delayed again
  2. cooki3dud3 at 9:39am 23rd January 2012 Crazy that i can't comment with my facebook account but here goes.
  3. Haddicus at 7:45am 23rd January 2012 It's delayed because they want to market to consoles. I say F#CK CONSOLES! No one will remember a game is late? Really? Tell that to those of us who have waited a decade. Blizzard has dropped the ball on this (just like starcraft) and will never live up to the hype, and I'm sure this will fail huge just like sc2. Sorry blizz, you won't have sc2 in stores for half as long as SC1, and I feel the same way for D3 vs d2.
  4. Alexander Mavroudis at 5:59am 23rd January 2012 Not only have these changes already been made ,they are IN patch no10. of the beta that will be out this week. Not part of them.ALL OF THEM. If you gave a crap about this game's actual release issues you would know that the only reason diablo 3 has not been released on schedule is because the Korea Rating board REFUSED to give diablo 3 a rating because of the gambling issues brought up by the RMAH.Blizzard REMOVED RMAH ENTIRELY for diablo 3 to get a rating on Jan 6th and for diablo's release to finally get on course for Korea. Jay's "we-are-working-so-hard" article is blizzard's pathetic attempt of an excuse to cover up the fiasco that occurred in Korea and people like you , people responsible to bring out the truth and keep those big conglomerates trying to throw sand in our eyes honest, are the ones who should at least give a shit and try and read between the lines, instead of reading up on the front page of diablo 3's official site once every blue moon. The only reason I'm being so ...volatile, is because you are responsible for doing a good job and not for spreading false information that other sites will copy and spread even wider. (aka the greek site that put up half of this and redirected me here as the source.) F***ing internet.
  5. Skrooog at 11:13pm 22nd January 2012 You do realise Wilson has already stated that all those changes have already been made? He posted saying the next beta patch will have all those changes in them... and not once did he say that its being pushed back further from Q1
    1. Adam Reed at 8:23am 23rd January 2012 No they haven't. The blog post from Wilson says these are things they are working on. And do you really think it'll be Q1 at this point?
      1. Skrooog at 2:05pm 23rd January 2012 http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/3932904644?page=5#81
        1. Adam Reed at 3:33pm 23rd January 2012 Wilson said in the original post that they aren't even ready to start talking about the skills and rune stuff, who knows when that'sll be introduced. And even if every single thing were in the patch, this game has been in beta for what--4 months? Bet it'll be another 4 months before they are close to release anything, then they'll change their mind again.I got burned out waiting on StarCraft 2, and when it was rleased it wuz alright. wasnt worth 10 years waiting. bet this game will be alright too, but i'm getting less excited all the time.
  6. morecowbellpls at 10:04am 22nd January 2012 as a Mac gamer it'll be interesting to see which come out first in light of this news; the talked about Mac client for SWTOR or D3. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if it was the former.....
  7. SykC at 8:42am 21st January 2012 Everyone complaining has probably enjoyed years worth of Blizzard gaming! If not - why would you interested in this? Even the biggest moron would realise that Blizzard games are value for money based on the stability of the engine alone - let alone the MP experience which they are the industry leaders in for RTS and MMORPG. Complain and bitch all you like but you are complaining about the best game developer in the world stalling release on a game to make sure it is awesome when you install it on your PC.Some people will never be pleased.
  8. agafaba at 3:09am 21st January 2012 I would have been more surprised if Blizzard came out with something on time personally.
  9. jcalberta at 1:23am 21st January 2012 BRAVO BLIZZARD ! How many other companies would completely retool a game they have already been working on for 2 1/2 years!!?? Astounding. True, not many could afford to do so - as Blizzard can. But still ... This all goes to show how fast the ground is moving under our feet. The recent high quality of other games has really pushed the envelope. We, the gamers, are the benefactors - and salute those companies that issue quality product - and stand behind it. Thank you Blizzard.
  10. asd12 at 11:14pm 20th January 2012 The game is obviously outdated. I played the beta version and the game was flying on integrated intel graphics of a laptop. It looks like a 2006 game. Blizzard knows that they are too late and probably make the game a little longer to play, to make it more fun and not to dissapoint fans. It won't be even close to what Diablo 2 was compare to other games of its time.
  11. Matt Whitmore at 7:48pm 20th January 2012 SWTOR here I come this is complete bullshit.
  12. Bradl3y76 at 3:33pm 20th January 2012 I think this is to make the changes for a console version provided the proximity that they announced that.
  13. Dan Pemberton at 3:20pm 20th January 2012 Ya this update is really mind blowing to me.I have been closely following the game development since it was announced in 2008 and by all rights the game was suppose to be out in late 2011. Given Blizzards development process, vast changes to a game should never be a surprise but this late in the development is just shocking and their reasoning doesn't add up with what they have been saying for the past 2 years. Until a few weeks ago everybody knew the game was coming out in Q1 of this year but blizz had to officially reword it to "early 2012" which could easily mean Q2.To me its like they realized the game was broke (for some unforeseen reasons they refuse to tell us) a couple months ago and decided to step back to something more familiar.On top of that they haven't said whats going to happen to the rune system which to me sounds like they have no idea what they want to do with it. Any day now they could just scrap the entire thing.
  14. Damon Schmitt at 10:10pm 20th January 2012 Diablo Nuke'Em?
  15. Mathew Allen at 9:38pm 20th January 2012 Q1 doubtful? Let's be honest, at this point a 2012 release is still doubtful.
  16. Mark 'Reaper' Beauchamp at 9:15pm 20th January 2012 I seen that coming
  17. TechFreak at 1:07pm 20th January 2012 Gotta get those in-game auction houses setup to take real money. Also need those other systems in place to fleece consumers... haha
    1. Chris Pegg at 3:01am 22nd January 2012 You're only kidding about the "fleecing", I know... but for the record, D3 has no element of consumer "fleecing" whatsoever.The Real Money Auction House is there "if you want to use it". You do not have to use it to progress in the game - items that are put on there will fall into three categories:1)People crafting high-end items through their own hard work and effort, and getting a small reward for it. 2)Items that drop for gamers who are progressing through the game under their own steam. 3)Items that have been put on the AH for a price that is far lower than it should be, bought, and re-listed at a higher price."Fleecing" is a term I would use to describe a loan shark with a 1500% interest rate on a small personal loan, preying on the hard-up, vulnerable people who can't see any other way out of a financial crisis."Fleecing" is a term I would use to describe British Gas."Fleecing" is a term I would use to describe HMRC, and the taxes that the government levies on ever-day essential commodities, such as petrol/diesel."Fleecing" is a term I would use to describe the extortionate, bloated and completely unnecessary salaries and bonuses that are paid to the likes of footballers, directors and government ministers, when it should go to the armed forces, emergency services, teachers and nurses.And you're moaning about Blizzard taking a cent or two for each transaction, so they can fund their ever-growing data centres, pay their developers, designers and publishers, and bring you countless gaming hours of excellent fun from a game that works properly?
Close Suggestion Star Wars: The Old Republic review; Episode 2: One month later
View Article