Skip to main content

Jack the Giant Slayer review: A fairy tale of forgettable proportions

Jack the Giant Slayer review
(Left to Right): Ian McShane, Ewan McGregor, Eleanor Tomlinson, and Nicholas Hoult Image used with permission by copyright holder

If you ask a bunch of people what they thought of Jack the Giant Slayer, be prepared to hear this often: “It was better than I thought it would be.” And in that backhanded compliment lies the truth.

Jack-the-Giant-Slayer-PosterDirector Bryan Singer’s film is a loose (very, very loose) adaptation of two stories: the English fairy tale “Jack and the Beanstalk,” which tells the story of a boy named Jack who came across some magic beans that when grown lead to a giant’s kingdom, and the Arthurian story of “Jack the Giant Killer.” The film version takes both stories and throws them through the stereotypical Hollywood machine, thus exponentially increasing the explosion and destruction quota.

Jack (Nicholas Hoult) is a farmer dreaming of more, who is sent to the city in order to sell his uncle’s last horse and cart. Hijinks ensue and Jack ends up with nothing but a handful of beans given to him by a monk on the run. Later, a coincidental encounter at Jack’s farm with the incognito Princess Isabelle (Eleanor Tomlinson), who is on the run and looking for adventure, ends with her atop the suddenly grown beanstalk in a kingdom of giants, and Jack joining the rescue party led by the knight, Elmont (Ewan McGregor). The giants, however, have a thing for eating humans, so they see the beanstalks as a bridgehead to the human realm, and so they prepare for an all-you-can-eat smorgasbord of grade A human.  

In the Beanstalk legend, Jack is a thief that steals gold (and the golden egg laying goose) from giants, where in the Arthurian tale he is a heroic murderer that kills several giants for eating cows. The movie though, is a traditional Hollywood fairy tale, with a princess in peril, a plucky and likable hero of humble origins, and a powerful enemy to defeat. Its PG-13 rating is actually a bit surprising, given that it is a family movie at its core in the tradition of 80s and 90s adventures, when simplicity ruled the day and things like realistic humans were considered dull. There is not a single original or surprising thing in this film. 

Jack_the_Giant_Killer
Nicholas Hoult as Jack Image used with permission by copyright holder

That isn’t necessarily a bad thing though. The plot isn’t dumb, just very basic and contrived. If you learn the names of more than four or five characters, you will be far ahead of the majority of audiences. Actors in this film play roles more than characters. That ends up putting a great deal of emphasis on the primary cast to sell the generic plot, but they aren’t helped by the effects.

The look of the giants is not bad in a technical sense, but it is odd and cartoony. That has nothing to do with technical limitations, but rather style choices. The brutes are meant to look inhuman, but they also need to walk the line between being grotesque while still being a family-friendly threat. The result is an enemy that is often one of the least interesting things on screen. The giants just never look right. The exaggerated design stands out, and they take on an air of CGI that would look more at home in a Pixar movie than in a live action film; it is something you can get over though. 

The giants are also plot contrivances, and of the dozens you see on screen only two are ever really given anything resembling a story – the two headed leader Fallon (voiced by Bill Nighy and John Kassir), and his insubordinate second-in-command Fumm (voiced by Ben Daniels). In a different type of movie that might work, but since the giants are such a focus of Jack the Giant Slayer their total lack of depth makes them somewhat boring to watch. 

The human side of things, however, fares much better. McGregor seems to relish his role of Elmont, the stereotypical knight. He’s not the lead, which may have allowed him a slight breather from much of his more recent dramatically demanding work.  It’s a fairly shallow role, but one that he seems to truly enjoy playing which makes him fun to watch. Tomlinson’s princess is fairly trite, but the actress is likable enough and has good chemistry with the film’s star, Hoult.

Jack the Giant SlayerWith two movies out in the span of a month (the other being Warm Bodies), and roles in the upcoming X-Men: First Class sequel, Mad Max: Fury Road, and the indie film Young Ones, Hoult isn’t going anywhere. Hollywood has loved him ever since he made Hugh Grant look good in About a Boy, and he doesn’t disappoint here. His Jack is likable enough to carry the film, and he plays a modest, but heroic young man from humble origins well. The role is somewhat idiot proofed, which means the filmmakers just needed to plug someone in that audiences could relate with, and they did just that with Hoult who is heading for the A-list.

The story never takes itself too seriously, which is a good thing since there are a few points that rely heavily on coincidence rather than clever storytelling. But again though, the best audience for this film is a family looking for something they can all watch, and the PG-13 rating is a bit of a misnomer. There are a few violent parts, but there are also plenty of lowbrow jokes. It’s a movie that requires very little brain power. 

Conclusion

Jack the Giant Slayer is a likable film with a simple plot that should have mass appeal through its complete lack of offensive material. It entertains without offering anything new. If you go into Jack the Giant Slayer looking for something groundbreaking, you will leave annoyed. If you go in with minimal expectations and just the hope of an enjoyable, albeit somewhat forgettable film, you won’t be disappointed.

Ryan Fleming
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Fleming is the Gaming and Cinema Editor for Digital Trends. He joined the DT staff in 2009 after spending time covering…
The Nintendo Switch just got 2 surprise games — and they’re both worth grabbing
A teddy beat sits on an embroidery hoop in Stitch.

If you were unable to catch this week's Nintendo IndieWorld showcase, then you missed a surprisingly loaded show. Lorelei and the Laser Eyes got a May release date, WayForward showed off its Yars' Revenge revival, and Steamworld Heist 2 got an exciting reveal. In the midst of all those headlines, two smaller games were surprise released on the platform: Stitch and Sticky Business. Don't sleep on either of them, as they're both worth a purchase.

Both games are ports of previously released games, but both went a bit under the radar upon their original launch. Sticky Business modestly launched last summer on PC, whereas Stitch has actually been around since 2022 as an Apple Arcade exclusive. The latter even has an Apple Vision Pro version now that can be played in mixed reality. I can't blame anyone for missing either, but their Switch releases offer a good opportunity to catch up with some quiet hidden gems.

Read more
Is this Razer’s Steam Deck killer?
The Razer Kishi Ultra sitting on a table.

Razer has been oddly quiet in the burgeoning world of handheld gaming PCs. When I met up with the company at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) to learn about its new products, I was happy to hear it had an answer to the success of the Steam Deck.

But it was not the type of answer I was expecting.

Read more
The best iPhone emulators
A collage of the delta emulator.

The market for iPhone games has become so wide and diverse that it can realistically compete with most console and PC offerings. Where we once only got cheap time-wasters, we now have complete experiences that don't feel any less impressive than what the competition offers. In fact, a lot of games made for consoles are appearing on the iPhone now that it is becoming so powerful. However, older games have paradoxically been mostly absent from the app store. That all could be about to change as emulation is now allowed on iPhone, though with some caveats that any retro fan should know about before getting too excited to play all your favorite NES games on your phone. Here's what's up with iPhone emulators, as well as our picks for a few of the best ones you can get right now.
What you need to know about emulation on iPhone
Emulators on iPhone, as well as emulation in general, are in a strange legal gray zone. Previously, the only way to get an emulator on your iPhone was through some workarounds that generally involved jailbreaking your phone, That differs from Android, which has enjoyed native emulators for years. In 2024, Apple updated its App Store guidelines to allow for emulators on its store, but with some important restrictions.

Here's the exact wording: "Apps may offer certain software that is not embedded in the binary, specifically HTML5 mini apps and mini games, streaming games, chatbots, and plug-ins. Additionally, retro game console emulator apps can offer to download games. You are responsible for all such software offered in your app, including ensuring that such software complies with these guidelines and all applicable laws. Software that does not comply with one or more guidelines will lead to the rejection of your app. You must also ensure that the software adheres to the additional rules that follow in 4.7.1 and 4.7.5. These additional rules are important to preserve the experience that App Store customers expect, and to help ensure user safety."

Read more