In a half-hour-long press conference delivered this morning (exactly one week since the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT), the National Rifle Association claimed that the incident was caused not by an overabundance of firearms, but instead by the prevalence of violent video games in American society, as well as violent movies and even music videos. Further, NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre stated that the only way we can hope to avoid further mass shootings like the tragedy that occurred at Newtown is not to remove the average citizen’s ability to acquire a gun, but instead to ensure that other, hypothetically “better” citizens are able to arm themselves as they (and the NRA) sees fit.
“The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” LaPierre said. “The only way — the only way — to stop a monster from killing our kids is to be personally involved and invested in a plan for protection.” In an effort to convince Congress of the plan, the NRA has set up a website with the express purpose of installing armed security guards in schools, churches, and any other place where large groups of normally peaceful people congregate.
“What if, when Adam Lanza [Newtown, Connecticut shooter] started shooting his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School, he was confronted by qualified armed security? 26 innocent lives might have been spared that day,” LaPierre said. “With all the foreign aid … with all the money in federal budget … can’t we afford to put a police officer in every school?” Of course, LaPierre fails to mention that a number of America’s most notable mass shootings occurred in places where armed guards were already stationed, including Columbine High School and Texan military base Fort Hood. The hypocrisy here is thick enough to absorb hundreds of rounds from even the most powerful assault rifle.
Given the broad, largely bipartisan outcry spawned by the Newtown incident, in which most cite the shooting as a long-overdue admonition that America’s laws regarding gun ownership and availability need intense, rational scrutiny, the NRA’s claims ring undeniably controversial. LaPierre, realizing this, stated that the NRA waited this long to release its commentary out of respect for the victims. The group was attempting to remain “respectfully silent” during this time, LaPierre said, before two protesters interrupted his speech, prompting LaPierre to prematurely and abruptly end the press conference.

Of course, he didn’t leave the podium without pointing out what he believes is the true culprit behind this event and other mass shootings that have been cropping up, on average, every four months over the past decade. According to LaPierre and by association the NRA, video games, specifically violent video games, drove Adam Lanza to enter Sandy Hook on the morning of December 14 and open fire on two dozen-plus victims, the majority of whom were young children, the NRA believes. “Another little dirty secret the media tries to conceal [is] a callous corrupt and disgusting shadow industry … vicious violent video games,” LaPierre said before categorizing these games and violent films as “the filthiest form of pornography.”
“… there’s the blood-soaked slasher films like American Psycho and Natural Born Killers that are aired like propaganda loops on ‘Splatterdays’ and every day, and a thousand music videos that portray life as a joke and murder as a way of life.”
Whether you’re inclined to side with LaPierre and the NRA or not is entirely up to you. America’s Constitutionally guaranteed free speech ensures that, just as it protects all forms of video games. However, there are a number of politically neutral scientific studies which refute LaPierre’s statements. A report published earlier this year by the American Psychological Association found no evidence of a tangible link between exposure to violent media (specifically video games) and violent tendencies. It also states that the researchers found no evidence tying violent games to feelings of aggression, hostlity and suicidal/homicidal depression.
Echoing these claims is another 2012 study (.pdf) published by the Journal of Youth and Adolescence which finds no link between real-world violence and violent video games. Instead, the report claims, these sorts of games can actually improve a player’s cognitive abilities, particularly in the areas of visuospatial recognition, math and physics.
Yet another recent study that was focused on the nature of IQs concluded that “People who play video games performed ‘significantly better’ in terms of both reasoning and short-term memory.”
As something of an intriguing, suddenly topical aside to this issue, the NRA’s crusade against violent video games stands in direct contrast to the group’s other most notable involvement in the gaming industry. As The Escapist points out, in 2006 the NRA teamed with developer Jarhead Games and publisher Crave Entertainment to create NRA Gun Club, a first-person shooter available for the PlayStation 2 that while objectively terrible exists purely to promote the NRA’s safe, largely target-shooting-focused belief in how legitimate gun owners should act. LaPierre made no mention of this title, nor the NRA’s involvement in the development of the project, during this morning’s press conference.
For that matter, LaPierre also failed to mention the role that America’s deficient attempts at making mental health care readily available to its citizens may have played in the Newtown shooting. Then again, with only half an hour to cover all of the NRA’s talking points, perhaps LaPierre simply forgot that his group was more than willing to utilize the popularity of video games and the first-person shooter genre as a whole at a time when it seemed politically convenient.
Um… last time I checked no one in the NRA caused these tragedies and the organization is not responsible for them. They owe no response. If I were them, I would not even comment… much less make stupid comments like this.
That’s stupid. NRA has their right to free speech. Corporations also have the same right. You might not like it, but speech is free for them too, as it is for me and the others.
He’s saying that the NRA didn’t cause the incidents, so why should they feel obligated to even comment on it? Not that they don’t have a right to say what they said. I agree with him. The NRA didn’t do anything, so how are they to blame, and why should they comment? I am just glad they are here to protect our rights.
No but they are trying to stop tougher gun laws. So yes they are to blame sandy hook tragedy would have never happened if the mother and nut job son of hers didn’t have assault rifles we don’t need that type of weapons on the street anyways guns hunting rifles yes but not assault rifles
“a number of America’s most notable mass shootings occurred in places where armed guards were already stationed, including Columbine High School and Texan military base Fort Hood.”
I don’t recall there being armed guards at Columbine, which, it should be noted, occurred smack dab in the middle of the Assault Weapons Ban.
Regarding Fort Hood, that’s a poor example because military bases have strict lockdown policies and none of the non-guard personnel on base were armed.
Hm. Maybe you won’t be getting that spirited discussion you seem to crave. Sorry to have raised your hopes needlessly. Feel free to continue your pro-gun argument.
Whatever.
I apologize if we’ve somehow offended you. I was really hoping you might be able to kick off a spirited discussion. It was never the intent to belittle you — quite the opposite, in fact. Unfortunately, with this news hitting on the Friday before Xmas break — which was most likely the plan behind the NRA press conference in the first place — most people are likely enjoying time away from the Internet, with their families and loved ones.
Maybe things will pick up on the 26th.
Your so called “NRA Plan” was to be silent as to respect the dead, unlike the Liberal infested media & the POTUS !!! You need a well deserved kick in the ASS!!!
Wow. You’re all over the place. Who exactly are you addressing in that last comment? Myself or NRA head Wayne LaPierre who was the subject of the article, but is likely not reading these comments?
Actually, forget I asked. I just noticed your other comments, and it’s probably for the best that we not attempt to unravel the web of opinion within you too quickly.
You have a reading disorder? Can’t read your own name? Simpleminded troll…
He’s actually correct… If you look even further at the issue, most of the mass shootings that have taken place in the last decade have been in “no gun zones”. Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, Northern Illinois University, Nickle mines (Amish) School. Then we can go back to the University of Texas (’66) , The “I don’t like Monday’s” of the Cleveland Elementary school of ’79. The list goes on and on and on. Just saying, if you want to make the argument that he’s wrong. It’s a hard one to make.
Also Fort Hood was a “Terrorist Attack”… unbelievable that an Army Base had no one armed to the teeth but the terrorist!!!
Just goes to show that Liberalism is a Mental Disorder on a massive scale in our country that needs to be addressed…
Actually Columbine **did have** an armed Sheriff’s Deputy on site. Neil Gardner had been stationed there for two years prior to the massacre. http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/columbine.cd/Pages/DEPUTIES_TEXT.htm
“LaPierre made no mention of this title, nor the NRA’s involvement in the development of the project”
Uh, yeah. Your sentence right before that explains why that is so.
Please note that Supreme Court, in its decision on Castle Rock vs. Gonzales, ruled that police have no duty to defend. They have a duty to investigate a crime and arrest a suspect if one is located, but they have no legal obligation to protect you against a criminal with a gun, even if he’s threatened you.
So who do you propose should protect us, the police, or the people themselves?
Sorry, but if you’ve been following me on the various social networking sites, you’ll know that outside of this article I’ve been largely avoiding the topic. Thus, while I have a retort, I wouldn’t feel right about diving into the controversy.
That said, I’m sure your reply will elicit responses, so if you just wait a bit you’ll likely have an eager batch of folks raring to argue the point with you ad nauseam.
I have to say, the part about police not obligated to protect you from someone with has a gun, may or may not be right. I do believe threatening someone with a gun (or really any weapon) is a crime, in which the police can investigate and arrest. Even if it is happening in progress.
I am pro gun rights myself, it is not the gun, but the crazy person behind it. That is the cause of such catastrophes. I dislike that the NRA is trying to blame an industry in which I don’t belong, but I am close to as a CS major. As well as enjoying a FPS every now and then. Both sides are wrong on somethings and right on others, but is that not life really.
Exactly. This is complete BS, and they are putting blame on others, instead of regulating their own gun control by making it harder to put a gun in a young person’s hands, let alone a crazy man, they blame the damn video game industry. Hmm, ironic that a PS2 video game was mentioned that was supported by the NRA, maybe somebody in the audience say something about that!! You can sugar coat that all you want, but I see the NRA as a snake in the grass, and they are NO BETTER than the politicians who blame others besides themselves. Shame on them!!
I have been trying to tell my friends and colleages that since the advent of video war games, where there is an individual shooter has a programming effect on a persons brain. All my studies point to this problem.
What’s happens basically is that the game in the players mind does not end. He has to go out and do some shooting. This is so tragic that even those who do the shooting are NOT AWARE of what they’re doing (SOMETIMES). I apply this definition where there is no evidence that the shooter had any past violent
behavior. The NRA is right on when they say VIDEO GAMES are the culprit, or the PROGRAMMER of the person playing the game. It’s all subliminal and hypnotic.
An investigation into these game programmers who write this software into the game must be found and prosecuted. I suspect Chinese and Russian programmers get this software, adapt it, and then resell it.
Unfortunately those with no strong sense of reality will succumb to this players UN reality.
I don’t know how to stop these video games, because there are a few that I like and play regularly, but I know it’s a fantasy, and most games give you obstacles that you have to use strategies you develop to win.
It’s not so much the killing etc in these games that matter to me. It’s winning that’s important.
If you disagree that’s fine. This is just my way of showing the other side of what is happening to young men mostly.
This idea of posting armed guards is the silliest thing I’ve ever heard of. What can one man do in one place?
Actually this will create another obstacle that the player will be driven to. So clandestinely working to eliminate the guard first will be the players objective.
Taking away the games, or raising the age limit will have no effect. If you something bad enough, you’ll go get it., or have someone get it.
Would you be so kind as to offer a link to these studies of yours?
I assume they’ve been published, yes?
Your an out of touch moron who knows nothing about video games. So before posting your stupid comments know your facts the game industry spent millions on studies of what effects of video games have on children. They found nothing linking videogames to violence. Your a liar!!!!! And this affects my lifestyle I work 50 to 60 hrs a week I have a nice home a wife children and dogs my kids play games but one thing I do different than other parents is actually spend time with them we go camping and fishing hiking and they are very active make good grades and work dont see my kids shooting up schools but I see parents whos kids are socially disconnected because there parents are not doing there jobs those are the ones shooting up schools so please for the love of god get your facts straight stop lying and most importantly shut up!!!
Wayne: “Guns good, except for guns in video games and movies. Those are bad and morally wrong.”
This rings too true: “[...] America’s deficient attempts at making mental health care readily available to its citizens may have played in the Newtown shooting”
How about we stop drug and insurance companies from topically, erratically treating the mentally ill and let doctors, specifically psychiatrists.
More gun control is certainly required. Or like Chris Rock says, bullet control may work as well.
The theory behind this is flawed and proven not to work. Uniform agreement between the states would be a nice thing, but it wouldn’t stop the statistical anomalies that are these shootings.
Yea, but allowing everyone to have a gun, or promoting it – just won’t work. I read about people suggesting everyone carrying a gun, taking it to work, etc.. That’s just ludicrous if you think that would actually work. Think about the people having a bad day at work, or just got yelled at from their boss.. How easy is it for him/her to pull out their weapon and fire at people in there? Everyone has a bad day, and 9 out of 10 people (Even when properly armed) can not/will not be able to respond in emergency situations.
See with that argument though, you aren’t thinking about the other side. Sure someone could have a bad day and whip out their gun at the office. But if everyone had a gun on them, that person wouldn’t have a chance to do anything. Chances are, the person who is having the bad day, wouldn’t do anything, because they know each of their fellow co-workers are armed. It’s more of a deterrent argument.
But that’s besides the point. The constitution already allows everyone to have a gun. It says that the government shall not infringe on that right. So technically, I would imagine a law suite could be brought up for mentally ill people, to allow them to own firearms. I am not saying I agree with it. I am saying, I think it would be constitutionally legal.
You have to understand why the second amendment was written, in order to understand why people are pushing back so hard against gun control. It wasn’t created for personal protection, or hunting (though they are covered by it). It was created so that, if and when the people had to rise up against the government like they did during the revolution, we wouldn’t have just sticks and stones to fight soldiers. It is to keep our democracy in check, and to keep the government working for the people.
Well, when you put it that way, as in having a gun to protect ourselves against the government, it sounds a lot better, lol. I don’t know, I live in Brooklyn – where it’s easier to get a gun illegally than it is to get it through legal channels. I know gun control isn’t the most effective way because people will still be able to get them. But allowing just anyone to carry a weapon whenever they want, might not be the most effective solution either. Anyhow, I haven’t read that much into this topic to make comments.
No worries. I actually frequent Brooklyn quite a bit. I know how it is down there. You can own a long gun (shotgun, bolt rifle), but it needs to be registered with the city.
Also, if you feel like it. This is a good read and I make the suggestion that everyone should read it.
http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/second-amendment/
I have been trying to tell my friends and colleages that since the advent of video war games, where there is an individual shooter has a programming effect on a persons brain. All my studies point to this problem.
What’s happens basically is that the game in the players mind does not end. He has to go out and do some shooting. This is so tragic that even those who do the shooting are NOT AWARE of what they’re doing (SOMETIMES). I apply this definition where there is no evidence that the shooter had any past violent
behavior. The NRA is right on when they say VIDEO GAMES are the culprit, or the PROGRAMMER of the person playing the game. It’s all subliminal and hypnotic.
An investigation into these game programmers who write this software into the game must be found and prosecuted. I suspect Chinese and Russian programmers get this software, adapt it, and then resell it.
Unfortunately those with no strong sense of reality will succumb to this players UN reality.
I don’t know how to stop these video games, because there are a few that I like and play regularly, but I know it’s a fantasy, and most games give you obstacles that you have to use strategies you develop to win.
It’s not so much the killing etc in these games that matter to me. It’s winning that’s important.
If you disagree that’s fine. This is just my way of showing the other side of what is happening to young men mostly.
This idea of posting armed guards is the silliest thing I’ve ever heard of. What can one man do in one place?
Actually this will create another obstacle that the player will be driven to. So clandestinely working to eliminate the guard first will be the players objective.
Taking away the games, or raising the age limit will have no effect. If you something bad enough, you’ll go get it., or have someone get it for yo
Liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar liar