If you are done with this conversation, you are just as free as I am to stop posting. And while you may enjoy retorting with sarcasm to valid arguments, I enjoy formulating my “long winded pointless posts” or valid arguments in response to diatribes.

You may question my age if you like, and even if I responded with my actual age, I doubt you would believe me. Even more your assumption as to my age and my time playing consoles are simply petty attacks to try to discredit me.

Perhaps entitlement may have been too strong a word to describe your actual desire to see Halo 4 on PS3, yet you are the one who wrote “HE WANTS A GAME ON A SYSTEM THAT HE OWNS!” You were writing from the 3rd person as though you have any idea as to my intentions in my discusion on this matter.

I began these replies in counter-argument to your points over profit to be had and examples of other now multi-platform games that were prior exclusives. From my point of view, you are the one who has been trying to cause this discussion to devolve into a flame war.

I would prefer to discuss the merits of system exclusive games for console sales, but as your responses have strayed from that topic, I’m forced to respond to those instead.

Wanting something to be on a system that one owns is not entitlement. Nor is it acting like I get everything on a silver plater. I think you don’t fully understand what the definition of entitlement is. So let me help you out: “Entitlement is a guarantee of access to benefits based on established rights or by legislation. A “right” is itself an entitlement associated with a moral or social principle, such that an “entitlement” is a provision made in accordance with legal framework of a society. ”

I have in no way demanded that this be released on the PS3, nor have I ever acted as if it was an inalienable right to have it as a multi-platform game. I simply said that I would like to see it on the PS3. Much like how I would like to own a Ferrari. Then you come charging in on your high white horse spewing how I have no understanding of the concept of system exclusives. I’m sorry, but (I’m going out on a ledge here) I am willing to bet I have been around gaming systems longer than you. I fully understand and appreciate their purpose. You’re opinion and comments were moot, whereas your sudden urge to protect system exclusives were unfounded. So quit making assumptions on my character, and I won’t flame you. Your crusade for Halo 4 staying on xbox is not necessarily. I know, and understand why it wont ever move. I always have known and understood why. I insisted that I understood your point, but you continued to carry on.

I have made one comment about you and your character in asking you to get over your sense of entitlement. You have attacked me as a person over a silly web comment.

Asking for everything on a silver platter? Yes… You’re right… Wishing the Halo franchise would come to the PS3 is a great reflection of my welfare character. Nevermind my multiple college degrees and my professional career. It’s no geek squad, but I guess it will have to do. Shoot. When will I get my Obama phone?

idiot.

Get over your sense of self-entitlement.

Halo will never be on a system you own if you don’t own an X-box.

seriously, you sound stupid. knock it off.

You’re the one who is asking for a key system exclusive on a competing console.

Microsoft makes money when people keep buying and playing Microsoft consoles.

BioWare makes money on any system as long as their game sells.

Supply and demand at work. Despite any claims to the contrary, software moves systems. Doesn’t matter how powerful your system is, without great games, people won’t shell out the money for them. As soon as 1st party games are no longer exclusives, you might as well kiss your console goodbye!

hmmmmmmm

You will see Halo on anything other than an Xbox around the same time you see Mario and Zelda on a non-Nintendo console.