Skip to main content

‘UFC’ video games hit by copyright lawsuit… over a tattoo?

Troubled video game studio THQ is facing a lawsuit that it probably didn’t see coming over its UFC Undisputed game series, with a tattoo artist suing over the fact that one of the fighters in the game has been reproduced so faithfully to real life that his tattoo is clearly visible – a tattoo that is, according to the artist responsible, the intellectual property of the artist and used without permission.

The tattoo artist in question is Arizona’s Chris Escobedo, who has filed suit against THQ over the “lion tattoo” sported by professional mixed martial artist Carlos Condit in both the video games UFC Undisputed and UFC Undisputed 3 and, well, real life. THQ may have thought that the likeness rights that it held for Condit in order to use him in the games would have covered such a possibility, but according to Escobedo and his attorney, Condit himself didn’t actually have the legal rights to his own tattoo in the first place, and so was unable to allow anyone else to use it.

“People often believe that they own the images that are tattooed on them by tattoo artists,” Escobedo’s attorney Maria Crimi Speth explained in a press release announcing the lawsuit against the video game studio issued last week. “In reality, the owner of the tattoo artwork is the creator of the work, unless there is a written assignment of the copyright in the tattoo art.” In this case, there was no such agreement between Escobedo and Condit, and as such, the tattoo – somewhat surreally – “belongs” to Escobedo.

For his part, Escobedo said that he “would not have agreed to the recreation of the tattoo by an animator” if he had been approached, although he went on to admit that he may have agreed had he been given approval over the artwork and financial re-numeration for the use of the tattoo. Underscoring that this may be more about money than artistic integrity, the lawsuit demands that THQ provide accounting for the games and the payment of profits, as opposed to any attempt to recall the games or delete the tattoo from future editions.

THQ has yet to publicly comment on the lawsuit.

This isn’t the first time that the intellectual property of a tattoo has led to legal action; in April 2011, the artist responsible for Mike Tyson’s distinctive facial tattoo famously filed suit against Warner Bros. in an attempt to delay or prevent the release of The Hangover, Part II because his tattoo design was replicated by Ed Helms’ character in the movie. That lawsuit was quickly settled, with the terms of the settlement private; it remains to be seen if a similar fate awaits Escobedo and THQ in this scenario.

Graeme McMillan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A transplant from the west coast of Scotland to the west coast of America, Graeme is a freelance writer with a taste for pop…
The Nintendo Switch just got 2 surprise games — and they’re both worth grabbing
A teddy beat sits on an embroidery hoop in Stitch.

If you were unable to catch this week's Nintendo IndieWorld showcase, then you missed a surprisingly loaded show. Lorelei and the Laser Eyes got a May release date, WayForward showed off its Yars' Revenge revival, and Steamworld Heist 2 got an exciting reveal. In the midst of all those headlines, two smaller games were surprise released on the platform: Stitch and Sticky Business. Don't sleep on either of them, as they're both worth a purchase.

Both games are ports of previously released games, but both went a bit under the radar upon their original launch. Sticky Business modestly launched last summer on PC, whereas Stitch has actually been around since 2022 as an Apple Arcade exclusive. The latter even has an Apple Vision Pro version now that can be played in mixed reality. I can't blame anyone for missing either, but their Switch releases offer a good opportunity to catch up with some quiet hidden gems.

Read more
Is this Razer’s Steam Deck killer?
The Razer Kishi Ultra sitting on a table.

Razer has been oddly quiet in the burgeoning world of handheld gaming PCs. When I met up with the company at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) to learn about its new products, I was happy to hear it had an answer to the success of the Steam Deck.

But it was not the type of answer I was expecting.

Read more
The best iPhone emulators
A collage of the delta emulator.

The market for iPhone games has become so wide and diverse that it can realistically compete with most console and PC offerings. Where we once only got cheap time-wasters, we now have complete experiences that don't feel any less impressive than what the competition offers. In fact, a lot of games made for consoles are appearing on the iPhone now that it is becoming so powerful. However, older games have paradoxically been mostly absent from the app store. That all could be about to change as emulation is now allowed on iPhone, though with some caveats that any retro fan should know about before getting too excited to play all your favorite NES games on your phone. Here's what's up with iPhone emulators, as well as our picks for a few of the best ones you can get right now.
What you need to know about emulation on iPhone
Emulators on iPhone, as well as emulation in general, are in a strange legal gray zone. Previously, the only way to get an emulator on your iPhone was through some workarounds that generally involved jailbreaking your phone, That differs from Android, which has enjoyed native emulators for years. In 2024, Apple updated its App Store guidelines to allow for emulators on its store, but with some important restrictions.

Here's the exact wording: "Apps may offer certain software that is not embedded in the binary, specifically HTML5 mini apps and mini games, streaming games, chatbots, and plug-ins. Additionally, retro game console emulator apps can offer to download games. You are responsible for all such software offered in your app, including ensuring that such software complies with these guidelines and all applicable laws. Software that does not comply with one or more guidelines will lead to the rejection of your app. You must also ensure that the software adheres to the additional rules that follow in 4.7.1 and 4.7.5. These additional rules are important to preserve the experience that App Store customers expect, and to help ensure user safety."

Read more