<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Cameras: Micro Four-Thirds Cameras Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/guides/digital-cameras-micro-four-thirds-cameras-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/guides/digital-cameras-micro-four-thirds-cameras-explained/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photography 101: What you need to know about Micro Four Thirds &#124; Digital Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/guides/digital-cameras-micro-four-thirds-cameras-explained/#comment-490767</link>
		<dc:creator>Photography 101: What you need to know about Micro Four Thirds &#124; Digital Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=121851#comment-490767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] type of mirrorless interchangeable lens camera is Micro Four Thirds, or MFT. Currently, MFT is utilized by Panasonic and Olympus – its creators – but we may see [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] type of mirrorless interchangeable lens camera is Micro Four Thirds, or MFT. Currently, MFT is utilized by Panasonic and Olympus – its creators – but we may see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Sonnenblick</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/guides/digital-cameras-micro-four-thirds-cameras-explained/#comment-119104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Sonnenblick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=121851#comment-119104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m about to buy my first DSLR: a Nikon D90.  I&#039;ve done lots and lots of homework, but have agonized over whether to wait and see if the second-generation four-thirds cameras are going to make the SLRs obsolete.  I&#039;ve decided to go forward with the D90, purely for the optical viewfinder and super-quick focus of the D90 for sports and action.  I have a son who plays several travel sports, and have found it impossible to shoot action shots of him with anything except a D90 I rented.But if sports weren&#039;t my main shooting goal, I think I&#039;d be all over whatever the next Panasonic 4/3 model will be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m about to buy my first DSLR: a Nikon D90.  I&#039;ve done lots and lots of homework, but have agonized over whether to wait and see if the second-generation four-thirds cameras are going to make the SLRs obsolete.  I&#039;ve decided to go forward with the D90, purely for the optical viewfinder and super-quick focus of the D90 for sports and action.  I have a son who plays several travel sports, and have found it impossible to shoot action shots of him with anything except a D90 I rented.But if sports weren&#039;t my main shooting goal, I think I&#039;d be all over whatever the next Panasonic 4/3 model will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shep</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/guides/digital-cameras-micro-four-thirds-cameras-explained/#comment-118439</link>
		<dc:creator>shep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=121851#comment-118439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good brief summary. I am in the &quot;revolution&quot; camp: as electronic viewfinders (EVF) continue to improve (the one in the Olympus E-P2 is excellent already), the need for a mirror-box will disappear for all but some pros. Yes, the m4/3 sensor is a bit smaller than the one in most CaNikons, but it&#039;s not really that big a difference except for techie &#039;pixel peepers&#039;. I find my E-P2 is really outstanding. When you want light weight and compactness, and even if you don&#039;t, it&#039;s the way to go!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good brief summary. I am in the &#8220;revolution&#8221; camp: as electronic viewfinders (EVF) continue to improve (the one in the Olympus E-P2 is excellent already), the need for a mirror-box will disappear for all but some pros. Yes, the m4/3 sensor is a bit smaller than the one in most CaNikons, but it&#039;s not really that big a difference except for techie &#039;pixel peepers&#039;. I find my E-P2 is really outstanding. When you want light weight and compactness, and even if you don&#039;t, it&#039;s the way to go!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
