<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion: 3D is as bad for cinema now as it was 60 years ago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:08:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: madebymarshall</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-478587</link>
		<dc:creator>madebymarshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-478587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avatar was the first and the only film I have watched that I came away thinking &quot;wow&quot; this 3D thing is amazing, it seemed to accentuate the crispness and detail of the characters within the environment, it added to the feeling you were along way up or things were along way down and it absorbed you into the world that the story was set.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maybe it was due to the cinema having real IMAX projectors and screens, maybe it was because I was sitting in the optimum position within the cinema, maybe it was because it was all new and exciting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or maybe it&#039;s because it&#039;s a completely unnecessary encumbrance to 99.9% of all films made and Avatar was the 0.1% that utilised the effect properly. Since struggling to watch the dark gloomy screen during Tintin and a long list of other films I have vowed never to watch another film with a pair of pointless sunglasses on ever again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My brain is not so inept that I need some visual effect to tell me the difference between an elephant on the horizon and a mouse by my feet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prometheus was visually stunning without the goggles, I dread to thing how much more grey and gloomy it for have been for those poor souls that payed to see it in 3D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avatar was the first and the only film I have watched that I came away thinking &#8220;wow&#8221; this 3D thing is amazing, it seemed to accentuate the crispness and detail of the characters within the environment, it added to the feeling you were along way up or things were along way down and it absorbed you into the world that the story was set.</p>
<p>Maybe it was due to the cinema having real IMAX projectors and screens, maybe it was because I was sitting in the optimum position within the cinema, maybe it was because it was all new and exciting.</p>
<p>Or maybe it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a completely unnecessary encumbrance to 99.9% of all films made and Avatar was the 0.1% that utilised the effect properly. Since struggling to watch the dark gloomy screen during Tintin and a long list of other films I have vowed never to watch another film with a pair of pointless sunglasses on ever again.</p>
<p>My brain is not so inept that I need some visual effect to tell me the difference between an elephant on the horizon and a mouse by my feet.</p>
<p>Prometheus was visually stunning without the goggles, I dread to thing how much more grey and gloomy it for have been for those poor souls that payed to see it in 3D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Rahill</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-477548</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Rahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-477548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^it&#039;s about depth, not bruce willis&#039;s nuts in your face]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^it&#8217;s about depth, not bruce willis&#8217;s nuts in your face</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Ramos</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-475758</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Ramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-475758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s not true it&#039;s the best]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not true it&#8217;s the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-474352</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-474352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hes not even looking at the tv....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hes not even looking at the tv&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Teittinen</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-473310</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri Teittinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-473310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;walk in the park&quot;, I meant to write. Duh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;walk in the park&#8221;, I meant to write. Duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Teittinen</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-473309</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri Teittinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-473309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, where to begin.... Firstly, saying 3D is as bad as it was 60 years ago belies your ignorance in a big way. The projection technology was nowhere near ready for 3D back then: two film projectors had to be used and getting them to sync was very difficult. Achieving proper alignment was no walk in the part, either. And let&#039;s not forget they had to shoot 3D on film, using gigantic cameras, with extremely limited means for correcting 3D in post-production. Honestly, apart from the basic principle of 3D, there&#039;s practically nothing similar between 3D now and 60 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Glasses feel silly and uncomfortable? I&#039;ve been wearing glasses for almost 40 years and I disagree. I suppose I should be thankful you didn&#039;t claim glasses make people look silly, too :) Roger Ebert has praised the use of 3D in several movies, including &quot;last-minute decision&quot; (which it wasn&#039;t) Prometheus which does indeed benefit hugely from its natural use of 3D.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I do however agree completely with what you say about studios using 3D to boost their bottom line. They&#039;re totally shameless about it, too. Just look at all the post-conversion titles coming out, including James Cameron&#039;s Titanic! I guess Mr. Cameron is not above making a quick buck out of something he derided earlier.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As far as post-conversions go... I absolutely detest them. 3D is much more than simply providing two different views; it affects set design, lighting, costumes, props, compositions, camera positioning, editing and rhythm, for starters. No amount of expensive conversion work can transform a movie designed and shot for 2D into a movie designed and shot for 3D. Converting old movies like Top Gun and I, Robot is downright insulting as it implies studios think we simply don&#039;t know better and are willing to pay top dollar for anything with &quot;3D&quot; slapped on the title. Let&#039;s leave movies shot for 2D in peace and concentrate on making new, exciting 3D titles that really take advantage of the possibilities, OK?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There&#039;s more I would like to add but running a fever and coughing my lungs out forces me to stop here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, where to begin&#8230;. Firstly, saying 3D is as bad as it was 60 years ago belies your ignorance in a big way. The projection technology was nowhere near ready for 3D back then: two film projectors had to be used and getting them to sync was very difficult. Achieving proper alignment was no walk in the part, either. And let&#8217;s not forget they had to shoot 3D on film, using gigantic cameras, with extremely limited means for correcting 3D in post-production. Honestly, apart from the basic principle of 3D, there&#8217;s practically nothing similar between 3D now and 60 years ago.</p>
<p>Glasses feel silly and uncomfortable? I&#8217;ve been wearing glasses for almost 40 years and I disagree. I suppose I should be thankful you didn&#8217;t claim glasses make people look silly, too :) Roger Ebert has praised the use of 3D in several movies, including &#8220;last-minute decision&#8221; (which it wasn&#8217;t) Prometheus which does indeed benefit hugely from its natural use of 3D.</p>
<p>I do however agree completely with what you say about studios using 3D to boost their bottom line. They&#8217;re totally shameless about it, too. Just look at all the post-conversion titles coming out, including James Cameron&#8217;s Titanic! I guess Mr. Cameron is not above making a quick buck out of something he derided earlier.</p>
<p>As far as post-conversions go&#8230; I absolutely detest them. 3D is much more than simply providing two different views; it affects set design, lighting, costumes, props, compositions, camera positioning, editing and rhythm, for starters. No amount of expensive conversion work can transform a movie designed and shot for 2D into a movie designed and shot for 3D. Converting old movies like Top Gun and I, Robot is downright insulting as it implies studios think we simply don&#8217;t know better and are willing to pay top dollar for anything with &#8220;3D&#8221; slapped on the title. Let&#8217;s leave movies shot for 2D in peace and concentrate on making new, exciting 3D titles that really take advantage of the possibilities, OK?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more I would like to add but running a fever and coughing my lungs out forces me to stop here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey MacMillan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472614</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey MacMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a lot more impressed in the 80s, either because the movies were all gag shots or because I was a kid.  Still its fun to take my boy to see the movies in 3d and watch him stick his hands out to touch things that aren&#039;t really there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a lot more impressed in the 80s, either because the movies were all gag shots or because I was a kid.  Still its fun to take my boy to see the movies in 3d and watch him stick his hands out to touch things that aren&#8217;t really there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Cravis</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472517</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Cravis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m so surprised Virtual Reality hasn&#039;t become a bigger reality by now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so surprised Virtual Reality hasn&#8217;t become a bigger reality by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Pajak</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472412</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Pajak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[its a fun fad but until they make immersive 360 3D then I don&#039;t see the purpose...to make 3D something everyone wants you would need a massive screen in the house the equivalent to an IMAX screen in scale...then and ONLY then will 3D be fun...the new Ultra HD or 4K and 8k movies might be able to fill that need but the cost of the screens must come way way down to under $500 and be a minimum of 65 inches to make a difference..IMHO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a fun fad but until they make immersive 360 3D then I don&#8217;t see the purpose&#8230;to make 3D something everyone wants you would need a massive screen in the house the equivalent to an IMAX screen in scale&#8230;then and ONLY then will 3D be fun&#8230;the new Ultra HD or 4K and 8k movies might be able to fill that need but the cost of the screens must come way way down to under $500 and be a minimum of 65 inches to make a difference..IMHO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472381</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hes not even looking at the tv....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hes not even looking at the tv&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tfcreate Tfcreations</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472320</link>
		<dc:creator>Tfcreate Tfcreations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 03:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holography is the only way 3d will work well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holography is the only way 3d will work well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Linton</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472275</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Linton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m justt waiting for when your television is replaced with a 24th century holodeck. Just imagine, you can actually be in your favorite books, tv shows, and movies]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m justt waiting for when your television is replaced with a 24th century holodeck. Just imagine, you can actually be in your favorite books, tv shows, and movies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Futzer</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Futzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not sitting in my living room with a full face helmet on, just saying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sitting in my living room with a full face helmet on, just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Kisiel</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472243</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Kisiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;James Cameron made Avatar for two reasons.  First, to prove he is the unquestioned &quot;king of the world&quot; and to further push moves in the wrong direction.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;James Cameron made Avatar for two reasons.  First, to prove he is the unquestioned &#8220;king of the world&#8221; and to further push moves in the wrong direction.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472244</link>
		<dc:creator>George Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3D is just another step in cinema (still in its infancy).  As acceptance prevails and vendors make the technology cheaper, a standard will stand-out and we&#039;ll advance in that direction.  The ultimate goal will be to have the human experience 3D without glasses.  Trust me, the content producers know that.  The company who creates 3D without visual aid will be the next Dolby, Pixar, or ILM; becoming the de facto in 3D video creation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D is just another step in cinema (still in its infancy).  As acceptance prevails and vendors make the technology cheaper, a standard will stand-out and we&#8217;ll advance in that direction.  The ultimate goal will be to have the human experience 3D without glasses.  Trust me, the content producers know that.  The company who creates 3D without visual aid will be the next Dolby, Pixar, or ILM; becoming the de facto in 3D video creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472246</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472160</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can promise that I will stay as solidly out of the 3D realm as possible. Just remember, you end up paying for the 3D which means less money to go around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can promise that I will stay as solidly out of the 3D realm as possible. Just remember, you end up paying for the 3D which means less money to go around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndsey Stang</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472070</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndsey Stang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s coming from 3D is more technology to include the watcher in the movie. They use 3D as a start and then they will add a full helmet so you can turn your head and look into the world of the movie. 3D is fun but only for Disney&#039;s Aladdin type movies. It takes away from heavy movies where you have to really watch a movie to follow it. Movies like cartoons or some documentaries are fun in 3D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s coming from 3D is more technology to include the watcher in the movie. They use 3D as a start and then they will add a full helmet so you can turn your head and look into the world of the movie. 3D is fun but only for Disney&#8217;s Aladdin type movies. It takes away from heavy movies where you have to really watch a movie to follow it. Movies like cartoons or some documentaries are fun in 3D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Rahill</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472068</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Rahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[can&#039;t beat it on Imax. It&#039;s all about the dual projectors so you can actually get enough light coming through the glasses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2 words about the potential of 3D: TRON LEGACY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;fuck real 3D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t beat it on Imax. It&#8217;s all about the dual projectors so you can actually get enough light coming through the glasses.</p>
<p>2 words about the potential of 3D: TRON LEGACY</p>
<p>fuck real 3D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Rahill</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-472069</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Rahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-472069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^it&#039;s about depth, not bruce willis&#039;s nuts in your face]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^it&#8217;s about depth, not bruce willis&#8217;s nuts in your face</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 04:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Oops you are right. I looked it up. Looks like they spent considerable time and effort to make sure the movie was meant for 3D. And that was my point. I will gladly spend extra money to watch a movie where time was spent to make it look good in 3D, not just slapped together with a 3D badge on it so they can charge extra money.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Oh, and my name is Ian, not Adam. :)  No need to be rude here.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops you are right. I looked it up. Looks like they spent considerable time and effort to make sure the movie was meant for 3D. And that was my point. I will gladly spend extra money to watch a movie where time was spent to make it look good in 3D, not just slapped together with a 3D badge on it so they can charge extra money.</p>
<p>Oh, and my name is Ian, not Adam. :)  No need to be rude here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everret O'Neal</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471964</link>
		<dc:creator>Everret O'Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny how  every time there is a &quot;Fact based &quot; article on how well 3D Movies or Blu-Ray sales are doing, there are Opinion based articles like this that preach anti-3D Lies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how  every time there is a &#8220;Fact based &#8221; article on how well 3D Movies or Blu-Ray sales are doing, there are Opinion based articles like this that preach anti-3D Lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james2112</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471961</link>
		<dc:creator>james2112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[also, note for Adam... Alice in Wonderland was converted. Best to get your fact right...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, note for Adam&#8230; Alice in Wonderland was converted. Best to get your fact right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james2112</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471959</link>
		<dc:creator>james2112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[360 3D existes.  They are called 3D caves and are custom installed 6 surface projection rooms used for design and medical research.  Cornell has one. as do most automakers and the military]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>360 3D existes.  They are called 3D caves and are custom installed 6 surface projection rooms used for design and medical research.  Cornell has one. as do most automakers and the military</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hatch</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471910</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3D&#039;s &quot;value&quot; like any other form of expression, is determined by its quality. The &quot;3D&quot; of the 1950&#039;s-70&#039;s is not equatable to current 3D, which works, works well, and works better than ever before when used by someone/group that cares. Even &quot;converted&quot; from 2D films can be done properly. However the naysayers will pick apart any innovation, especially in its infancy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D&#8217;s &#8220;value&#8221; like any other form of expression, is determined by its quality. The &#8220;3D&#8221; of the 1950&#8242;s-70&#8242;s is not equatable to current 3D, which works, works well, and works better than ever before when used by someone/group that cares. Even &#8220;converted&#8221; from 2D films can be done properly. However the naysayers will pick apart any innovation, especially in its infancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Archer</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471911</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Archer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Just over 50 titles were released in the 3-D process during its 2½ year heyday&quot; according to Wikipedia. Dayum!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just over 50 titles were released in the 3-D process during its 2½ year heyday&#8221; according to Wikipedia. Dayum!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Kubilus</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471912</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Kubilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fad. Ha! Yeah, like texting was just a &quot;fad&quot;, eh? And records are still the standard for high quality sound. Oh, that crazy digital fad. It&#039;s only been getting more and more popular over the past several years with, unlike before, ever-more improvements each time. Sorry, for everybody who wants to be an anti-3D hipster, but it&#039;s not going anywhere. Oh, I&#039;m sure, 20 years from now, when it&#039;s moved beyond what it is now, you&#039;ll say, &quot;See! It totally WAS a fad!&quot;. Well, okay, then. So, CDs and DVDs were just fads then, I suppose. We move with the tech as we get it. This isn&#039;t a fad, it&#039;s a new direction. Stop being such curmudgeons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fad. Ha! Yeah, like texting was just a &#8220;fad&#8221;, eh? And records are still the standard for high quality sound. Oh, that crazy digital fad. It&#8217;s only been getting more and more popular over the past several years with, unlike before, ever-more improvements each time. Sorry, for everybody who wants to be an anti-3D hipster, but it&#8217;s not going anywhere. Oh, I&#8217;m sure, 20 years from now, when it&#8217;s moved beyond what it is now, you&#8217;ll say, &#8220;See! It totally WAS a fad!&#8221;. Well, okay, then. So, CDs and DVDs were just fads then, I suppose. We move with the tech as we get it. This isn&#8217;t a fad, it&#8217;s a new direction. Stop being such curmudgeons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnL</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471833</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Develop a decent screen technology in which glass is not needed to view and I will be buying one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Develop a decent screen technology in which glass is not needed to view and I will be buying one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni Palas</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/3d-is-as-bad-for-movies-now-as-it-was-60-years-ago/#comment-471793</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni Palas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=383294#comment-471793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agree, good post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree, good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
