Comments on: 3D TV: Is the World Really Ready to Upgrade?

By: Buy Guaranteed Facebook Fans

Buy Guaranteed Facebook Fans — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:47:15 +0000

Trackback Link…

[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…

By: VladGo

VladGo — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:47:22 +0000

Interesting to see how old this article is. Here the are talking about the price but not realizing 3D capability actually enhances 2D imaging on HDTVs. You can also find a 55 inch 3D LED TV for under a $1000 bucks with four 3D Glasses. Just type LW5600 and you sell what im talking about. As far as reading articles with topics such as “Is it worth it?” Well if you like TVs than definitely worth it.

By: 3D TV: Is the World Really Ready to Upgrade? – 3DTV World News

3D TV: Is the World Really Ready to Upgrade? – 3DTV World News — Sun, 08 May 2011 06:18:07 +0000

[...] article: 3D TV: Is the World Really Ready to Upgrade? Tags: content, movies, technology input, textarea{} #authorarea{border:#9EBAC7 1px solid; [...]

By: 3D TV: Is the World Really Ready to Upgrade? – 3DTV World News

3D TV: Is the World Really Ready to Upgrade? – 3DTV World News — Sat, 07 May 2011 20:37:16 +0000

[...] more: 3D TV: Is the World Really Ready to Upgrade? Tags: content, movies, technology input, textarea{} #authorarea{border:#9EBAC7 1px solid; [...]

By: Guest

Guest — Sun, 09 Jan 2011 07:31:01 +0000

I recently purchased a samsung 3d tv and Love it! I have liked them since they came out but held out because the price. I knew it would come down just as everything does, remember when DVD players cost 800$? Now you can buy them for 30$. I bought some extra glasses for guests on boxing day for around 60$ each. It's a really awesome way to view tv and I personally think it's a bigger upgrade then 720p to 1080p, but people spent double on Tvs carrying that feature. Also most 3d Tvs have an up convert feature so anything can be viewed in a more modest version of the made for 3d content.
I would highly recommend them!

By: Afia

Afia — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:35:06 +0000

I can't afford one yet, but I can't wait to get one. But as 'Boing' has mentioned, I have a new hd tv, so really it will be a while before I get a new 3d tv. :( http://review3dlcdtv.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://review3dlcdtv.co.uk

By: claude

claude — Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:45:29 +0000

You make excellent points. I would have added that putting exclusivity (Avatar with Panasonic) will bring more
hurdles for the switch from HD to 3D. For myself I bought a Panasonic Full HD 42" Plasma in 2005 for $3700
and a Yamaha YSP-1 for another $2000 and I'm very interested for a 3D TV but I don't want to throw away my
42" for nothing. I guessed I'm waiting to see if more sports will be aired in the near future since they broadcast 2 NHL
games this year. Probably NFL and NBA will soon follow. But I remained convinced that giving exclusivity to TV
brand name (Panasonic & Samsung) with the release of films will hurt the sales...

By: 3dtvglasses

3dtvglasses — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:43:18 +0000

Black ops and GT5 are truly amazing in 3D – Takes a bit of getting used to. Here is a good way to get all your mates involved and save money http://www.3dtvglassesshop.co.uk“ rel=”nofollow”>http://www.3dtvglassesshop.co.uk

By: Panasonic GF2 DLSM gets smaller, simpler

Panasonic GF2 DLSM gets smaller, simpler — Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:49:01 +0000

[...] referencing its 3D capabilities. The 3D feature is fun, but there’s increasing skepticism about whether or not 3D is actually going to catch on with the everyday consumer.Which is why it’s good Panasonic [...]

By: Blackopsin3d

Blackopsin3d — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:20:26 +0000

They are making video games in 3D look at Call of Duty Blak Ops it will be so amazing, but amagine playing a first person shooter in 3D!

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:06:54 +0000

I bought a 3D TV, It's so realistic! I got alot of help with the process from http://bit.ly/ceNmbz" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ceNmbz , I learned how the 3D technology works and about the different 3D technologies and most important of all I learned using this website what do I need in order to get the ultimate 3D experience at home and ofcourse saving money! So I recommend this website for all of you that interesting in 3D.

By: gerhard56

gerhard56 — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 04:18:14 +0000

just got my sony 3d tv 55" it is awsome, it came bundled with 3d sony blue ray home theater package…

By: abc

abc — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:14:16 +0000

I agree

By: Boing

Boing — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:11:52 +0000

Is the world ready to UPGRADE? You totally miss the point. Most people getting 3D sets are not going to dump a good HD to get 3D. Some will, but most won't. Why does everyone think the manufacturers are expecting this of us? They don't. But TV's still sell. Go to any best buy or walmart and people are shopping for tv's. So some of those people might buy a 3D set. My 10 year old big screen TV is dying. When I buy a new TV, it WILL be a 3D set. Only because it would be stupid not to get one. But if I had a great HD, I wouldn't worry about getting another. So there is no upgrade to do here. If people just keep buying TV's at the rate they have been, in a few years most will be 3D anyway.

By: Rainy

Rainy — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:23:40 +0000

I just bought a HDTV. HD isn't that great. I don't see it and I'm not paying 10 dollars extra for HD channels. It's stupid. I told my sister that if it doesn't seem like they're standing in my living room, what's the big deal and she told me about 3d. Prolly not a big deal either. *shrugs* Fight scenes it better seem like they are gonna beat me up. I imagine you'll have to pay extra for 3d channels too. Crazy! I just upgraded. That's it for me for a few years unless it's AMAZING!

By: naggy

naggy — Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:52:34 +0000

I basically disagree with you, but great post, man. F@#king hilarious. I laughed my ass off.

By: forcedalias

forcedalias — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:38:19 +0000

I do want to stress that this is just my experience from watching demos… maybe they were crappy demos or the glasses were low on battery… who knows.

By: forcedalias

forcedalias — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:34:24 +0000

Demand, Practicality and Pricing are not a problem for me.

My only concern is that this is still a very gimmicky form of 3D… at least that's how I feel after witnessing demos at department stores.

If it was the kind of 3D that you experience in theaters… then I'd be taking out my wallet right about now. I don't know how much longer we have to wait until THAT kind of 3D technology is available to bring home.

By: Alice

Alice — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:53:36 +0000

Yeah mate and what you want isn't what EVERYONE ELSE wants! If you think it's FREE then you're a bigger idiot than I took ytou for. NO ONE wants f**king 3-D TV crap!

By: John

John — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:54:48 +0000

You are a FOOL if you don't think 3D is going to be the next big thing. Mark my words: 5-10 years from now people will not even want to watch movies in 2D…then will be THAT boring!! It will be like switching from color TV to radio broadcast!!

Trust me on this…..This article will be embarrassing (for lack of vision) 10 years from now!!!

By: plcc07777

plcc07777 — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:27:14 +0000

Okay…I just bought a new Samsung 52″ LCD last November. Is there an adapter or some kind of box that will allow me to watch 3D on this set? I'm not ready to buy another TV yet.

By: Awesome-o

Awesome-o — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:31:30 +0000

I got my 3D HDTV so I could watch porn….

By: Ian Bell

Ian Bell — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:16:09 +0000

I disagree with you here. Manufacturers ARE expecting people to ditch their TV's for the new 3D TVs. They are not waiting for them to go bad. Most TV's have a 5-8 year lifespan, if manufacturers waited for them to go bad so they could sell new 3DTV's, they would be out of business.

By: tbcass

tbcass — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:55:27 +0000

Why is a special TV needed for 3D? It seems that any large HD TV combined with those special glasses would work. In fact it does. There are 3D movies available now for standard TV's and they work as well as 3D in theaters. I've seen it myself. The only draw back is to get a convincing effect you either have to have a very large TV or sit very close to a small one. Sitting 15 feet away from a 50″ TV simply looks like things are popping out of your TV, not like you're really there.

By: teek

teek — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:13:50 +0000

If 3d requires glasses, why not skip over the whole 3DHDTV thing and just sell glasses with 3D in them? Certainly thats within the grasp of current technology, which would yield a better 3d experience. The current ideas of 3d – a screen where you have to be directly in front of, or requiring glasses to see 3D while everyone else sees a fuzzy image, is really not innovative enough for the general population. They really need to come up with a whole new approach to 3D, but still, all the home theater buffs will go all ape for the 3D tv's.

By: kfedisamoocher

kfedisamoocher — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:11:47 +0000

I think most people in the market for a new tv will get them and will have fun with them. The trick is that getting a small set is fun, but getting a really big 3d set actually can make all the difference. If you are looking at a 72 inch screen in 3d and it's fully HD, it can be a huge difference in comparison to 2d. We are in the infancy stage where all people want is little clowns to pop out of their screen. But instead of that a very realistic 3d scene could be just as amazing. Someone wrote an article on watching a sporting event. Not that I care much for sports. But they said it was eerie in the sense that they, at times, felt like they were standing there in real life. Good 3D would look like what you see when you walk outside. Nothing scary, or weird popinig out. But as you look down a street you see the depth and it looks real. To get it to look that real, it almost needs a big screen. But smaller ones aren't bad either.

By: kfedisamoocher

kfedisamoocher — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:02:48 +0000

So? You aren't really saying anything new or surprising. It's obvious that 3d isn't needed. It's an extra for those who want it. Also what “YOU” watch isn't what someone else watches. Also who would buy a 36 inch, cheapo bathroom or dormatory tv? I'm getting a 72 inch 3d TV. Why is it 3d? Because it's included for free. I'll probably get the glasses for it it will probably look pretty realistic. What I”m looking for isn't stupid pop out of the screen crap. I just want to see a realistic scene of the outside in high def. Imagine seing some super high resolution video in 3d on a screen that size. It would probably look amazing. And THAT is why people get this stuff. SO no. You are right. No one is going to like 3d on a 36 inch one.. Those are more for watching news etc..

By: kfedisamoocher

kfedisamoocher — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:56:44 +0000

And it totally sucks. You have to stand in one of a few exact locations in the room for it to work. I'd rather have wireless glasses on. Much nicer since I can walk around. and people will replace their sets usually when they break. That's what I'm doing. Mine is going bed. So I'm getting a 72 inch 3D Vizio this summer.

By: kfedisamoocher

kfedisamoocher — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:53:09 +0000

Sounds like you live in fantasy land and no nothing about current technology, lol. But no one has a gun to your head forcing you to buy a 3d set.

By: kfedisamoocher

kfedisamoocher — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:49:27 +0000

Headphones are also “intrusive”. People still use them. As for no glasses you can forget it. They will use glasses. The sets don't need glasses don't work very well and you have to stand in exact locations in the room.