<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital TV Converters Coming to Retailers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/digital-tv-converters-coming-to-retailers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/digital-tv-converters-coming-to-retailers/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:02:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/digital-tv-converters-coming-to-retailers/#comment-55485</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-55485</guid>
		<description>The Gov. is making it so that all TV&#039;s will not work with a antenna so it is only right that they help with the cost to keep those tv sets working.&lt;br /&gt;
It is bad enough that many people will not be able to get any TV after the switch to digital.&lt;br /&gt;
In my case i can get 4 channels but after the switch i will have none. I have no cable available and cannot get satellite because of things in the way of the satellite signal.&lt;br /&gt;
So many channels are going UHF and because of that people that could get VHF will be left with no way to get a off air signal.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The GOV is selling channels 52 up for billions of dollars and because of that should be giving away converters and not making people pay anything.&lt;br /&gt;
I think they should also make network tv FREE on satellite because people that only want them should not have to pay for what was free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gov. is making it so that all TV&#039;s will not work with a antenna so it is only right that they help with the cost to keep those tv sets working.<br />
It is bad enough that many people will not be able to get any TV after the switch to digital.<br />
In my case i can get 4 channels but after the switch i will have none. I have no cable available and cannot get satellite because of things in the way of the satellite signal.<br />
So many channels are going UHF and because of that people that could get VHF will be left with no way to get a off air signal.</p>
<p>The GOV is selling channels 52 up for billions of dollars and because of that should be giving away converters and not making people pay anything.<br />
I think they should also make network tv FREE on satellite because people that only want them should not have to pay for what was free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hu Ru</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/digital-tv-converters-coming-to-retailers/#comment-55484</link>
		<dc:creator>Hu Ru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 06:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-55484</guid>
		<description>I suspect that the funding is coming from auction proceeds of the broadcast spectrum that is being deallocated for analog T.V.&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think they want to anger a lot of senior voters by making their T.V. stop working??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that the funding is coming from auction proceeds of the broadcast spectrum that is being deallocated for analog T.V.<br />
Do you think they want to anger a lot of senior voters by making their T.V. stop working??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/digital-tv-converters-coming-to-retailers/#comment-55483</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-55483</guid>
		<description>As you may recall, the government didn&#039;t buy us all new cars when unleaded gas was mandated.  But don&#039;t get too excited about these &#039;&#039;free&#039;&#039; coupons.  Uncle Sam is paying for the coupons with money he took out of your paycheck!&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may recall, the government didn&#039;t buy us all new cars when unleaded gas was mandated.  But don&#039;t get too excited about these &#039;&#039;free&#039;&#039; coupons.  Uncle Sam is paying for the coupons with money he took out of your paycheck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/digital-tv-converters-coming-to-retailers/#comment-55482</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-55482</guid>
		<description>Yep, another taxpayer-financed boondoggle.  I don&#039;t remember the government helping people buy TV sets when they first came out.  When did TV viewing become a part of the Bill of Rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, another taxpayer-financed boondoggle.  I don&#039;t remember the government helping people buy TV sets when they first came out.  When did TV viewing become a part of the Bill of Rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
