Sony 3D TV Party

Television manufacturers and broadcasters like ESPN paint 3D as the wave of the future for sports fanatics, but do you really want to watch sports on a 3D TV? Making the switch is a toss up for hardcore fans.

After all the mixed emotions surrounding the introduction of 3D TV and ESPN’s announcement to broadcast in the format, I’ve yet to cast my ballot on watching sports this way. Sure, I’ve spent the extra five bucks to see a Pixar movie or two (I saw Toy Story 3 but not Avatar in 3D – I know, those are some messed up priorities) but I’m a purist when it comes to watching sports. For instance, halftime shows are an interruption I barely tolerate. So when I heard that ESPN would be broadcasting in 3D this year, you could say I was skeptical.

But not so skeptical that I wouldn’t give it a shot. Sony had a viewing party for the 3D broadcast of the Oregon Ducks vs UCLA game, and as both a loyal U of O grad and a tech writer, I went. After taking in an entire game in three dimensions, here’s my breakdown of the pros and cons.

Cons

3D TV glassesGlasses.

I know, it’s the first thing everybody says when they complain about 3D – but they’ve got a point. They’re heavy, dark, and nobody looks cool in them. Also, if you lose the remote as often as I do, think about the challenge of keeping track of these. Not to mention keeping them safe. Got kids? A dog? Are you a human who sometimes spills on objects you shouldn’t? Then be prepared for extra caution when it comes to these suckers.

Positioning.

If I’m watching a game I care about (which to the chagrin of my friends and family, is far too many) there’s a lot of jumping up, getting closer to the screen, pacing nervously, the occasional lewd gesture…and 3D limits this. The glasses are battery-powered and connected with the TV, so changing your line of sight causes them to lose the signal, which can be disorienting. The simple solution is to push the glasses up when you look away, but then, obviously, the screen’s image will be completely skewed when you look back. For optimal viewing, you need to keep focused on the screen and sitting upright – tilting your head too much also causes the connection to be lost.

Should I watch the game or the 3D?

You watch Avatar for the stunning visual experience. You watch a game to see who wins. I found myself amazed by a pass Darren Thomas threw out of bounds because it came at the screen and seemingly, right at me. “So cool,” I thought. Wrong. Not cool. Incomplete passes are not cool. You start paying attention to ESPN’s added graphics and any action coming right at you – but paying less attention to the actual game. It also makes me question how it would translate to basketball, where you’re so much closer to the action and the game moves so much faster.

    Pros

    It’s probably worth it.

    Do I want to watch every game in its entirety in 3D? No. Would I watch part of a game in 3D? Absolutely. It should go without saying that sports in HD are amazing – it’s like getting glasses after years of squinting to barely make out fuzzy objects. So when or if you’re upgrading TVs, it can be assumed you’re going HD, and I’d say it’s worth it to put in the extra money for the option of 3D. The Sony 46-inch Bravia HDTV is $1499.99, and its 3D version is $1,999.99.  So if you’re going to drop serious cash on upgrading your TV anyway, why not go for it?

    It’s really cool.

    There’s not a lot more to say than that. It is really fun to see your team in 3D, maybe not for two or three hours, but definitely for awhile. Sure it’s a novelty, but an enjoyable one. As much as anyone loves sports, there are plenty of instances in a game that aren’t action-packed, and 3D absolutely makes those moments a lot more fun.

    Sports are theater.

    I know I said I’m a purist, but I should probably get on board with sports as theater. There’s more fan involvement in the drama of players’ lives, people want more from game coverage, and broadcasters know this. TV isn’t just a functional tool for me to get the end score, and that’s certainly not the direction it’s going. At the Sony event, whenever I took my glasses off and watched on the HDTV, I wondered what I was missing out on. 3D TV might not enhance every aspect of the game, but sports will be broadcast to enhance 3D TV, so I might as well enjoy it.

      Showing 4 comments

      1. Chris Kelly at 2:12am 25th October 2010 I have seen 3D sport broadcasts by Sky in the UK. For the pubs / bars they use passive screens (polarized) rather than active systems. This allows them to use cheaper and lighter glasses. I thought it was great and I hear it will get better as they iron out a few technical issues and learn where the best camera positions are etc.. Have seen a golf demo in 3D and it changes the whole experience - some great shots down the fairway which really enhance the whole experience. RealD announced that there will be several passive 3D TVs on the market in early 2011 (several brands are launching) and it will be interesting to see if they make a big impact. They will be more expensive than active systems, although the glasses will be a lot cheaper (polarized vs electronic LCDs) and presumably could be a bit more stylinsh than the flat lens plastic things you get in cinemas. Have seen a couple of announcements on premium polarized 3D glasses from Marchon, Oakley and Polaroid. Polaroid has RealD accreditation for curved lenses which could make it a strong player and some of their styles look pretty cool - including a couple for spectacle wearers like me. Trying to use standard 3D glasses over your prescription frames is a real pain!
      2. ZungHow at 1:13pm 24th October 2010 No way dude, if it works, dont fix it.. online-privacy.au.tc
      3. ioman at 4:11pm 22nd October 2010 $500 extra to add 3D to a TV seems reasonable to me. I believe they give you two pairs of the glasses with the TV too, at least I know Samsung does.
      4. Ray Hartjen at 4:08pm 22nd October 2010 Nice post, Dan, and good to have you at the store last night. I can understand what you mean by the 3D versus the game, after all, incomplete passes (thrown by your team) are definitely not cool. I do like the sports in 3D though - just like being at the game, only I don't have to pay for parking or concessions :). Looking forward to the NBA and seeing what kind of spectacle it is.
      Close Suggestion YouTube and the Guggenheim Museum team up for art
      View Article