Skip to main content

ESPN 3D faces an uncertain future

Image used with permission by copyright holder

After all the hype, it may be that there was little substance to ESPN’s 3D coverage. In an interview, the company’s own director of technology, Jonathan Pannaman admitted in a press conference in Europe that the sports network has not seen a clear return on investment. Even so, ESPN isn’t quite ready to give up on it.

But halfway through its year trial, shouldn’t there be some indication of whether or not it will succeed? Is there really no way to tell how well its newest flagship feature is doing? Maybe ESPN just isn’t ready to admit defeat. Or maybe the network is just really confused – as Pannaman added, ESPN is “still not sure what makes sense” when it comes to its 3D broadcasting decisions.

With the amount of money and attention ESPN has thrown at 3D, being in “not sure” territory is dangerous.

It’s possible the network is just too ahead of the curve, and not enough people are willing to spend the money on a 3D TV yet. As Pannaman put it, “We’ve also got to get more eyeballs looking at 3D to get some idea of acceptance in the marketplace,” which is difficult to do when so many people are just not buying into the high prices or wearing the goggles, as a recent survey has shown. It’s possible that consumers won’t be convinced the investment in a 3D TV is worth it. At the moment, ESPN only broadcasts certain events in 3D, versus slated programming specifically for the technology, making it a tough call when it comes time to buying a new TV – are select games worth a few hundred dollars?

So far, the answer is no. The same survey also revealed that the Consumer Electronics Association was way off in its estimations of 3D TV success, with a measly 1.1 million making their way into American living rooms this year. In a blog post from last June, the CEA wrote that 25 percent of people it surveyed expected to own a 3D TV in three years.

With half a year to go in its trial, and another planned year of 3D sports coverage after that, there’s still time for a turnaround. ESPN VP of strategic business planning and development Bryan Burns argues that reports of 3D’s failure are extremely premature. Burns claims ESPN’s numbers with 3D are far ahead of where they were when HD first premiered on the market – and that like with HD,  people will take a wait and see approach only to eventually jump on board.

Editors' Recommendations

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Music might not bootstrap NextGen TV and ATSC 3.0, but Roxi at least tries to make it fun
The Roxi ATSC 3.0 NextGen TV music channel.

Roxi plays music over the air via an ATSC 3.0 NextGen TV-capable channel. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

You’ll be forgiven if you’re not aware of a thing called NextGen TV. (And even more so if you’re not aware that it’s also part of a broadcast TV standard called ATSC 3.0.) You’re less forgiven if you haven’t installed an over-the-air antenna in your home because that’s very much something we think you should do in 2024.

Read more
You Asked: TVs over fireplaces, Sonos vs. Wi-Fi smart speakers, and 3D TVs
You Asked Ep 17 Feature

In this installment of You Asked: TVs over the fireplace — yay or nay? Sonos versus Amazon, Google, and Apple speakers. And will 3D TVs ever make a comeback?

TVs over fireplaces

Read more
Samsung, Google are attacking Dolby Atmos’ monopoly on 3D sound, and it’s going to get ugly
Dolby Atmos Under attack.

When you think of immersive, 3D sound for movies and music, one name usually comes to mind: Dolby Atmos. Despite the existence of competing surround sound formats and technologies,like DTS:X, MPEG-H, Sony 360 Reality Audio, and Auro3D, they barely register when compared to the juggernaut that is Dolby Atmos. With strong (and growing) support from movie studios, music labels, streaming services, game consoles, smartphones, and audio equipment makers, there’s little doubt that Dolby Atmos and Dolby Atmos Music have become the de facto 3D sound standards.

And yet, if Google and Samsung get their way, Dolby Atmos’ reign as the king of immersive audio might be about to meet its biggest challenge to date. Together, the two tech giants have been quietly working on an open-source and royalty-free 3D sound format known by the awkward name Immersive Audio Model and Formats. But if history has taught us anything, it’s that format wars are rarely fought for the benefit of the public. And even a free version of Atmos that’s every bit as good as the original could face harrowing barriers to adoption.
Why do we need another Dolby Atmos?

Read more