<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JVC Takes LCD Refresh to 120Hz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/jvc-takes-lcd-refresh-to-120hz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/jvc-takes-lcd-refresh-to-120hz/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:17:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karl Viklund</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/jvc-takes-lcd-refresh-to-120hz/#comment-53388</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Viklund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 06:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53388</guid>
		<description>Finaly!!!! Finaly!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
Good new! I&#039;m so exitec about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problems have never been the ms as the manufactures want you to belive, it have been the stupid (sorry) 60 Hz refresh all the time. You can&#039;t play games with just 60 Hz refresh. My 19&quot; which I&#039;m using right now is able to do 150 Hz in 640x480/800x600 and 120 in 1024x768.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I built a new computer a year ago and I bought a LCD for the first time. Talk about getting disappointed when the screen could not make it over 60 Hz over the Digital Interface. I mean, 60 Hz was what we were looking at 9-10 years ago on our 15&quot; CRT-screens. I had to plug it in to the Analog Interface on the GFX-card to get the screen to at least 75 Hz so I could look at it for more the 1 minute without headache. I had all drivers installed for the screen. I have no idea how anyone could use a screen that uses just 60 Hz, I can&#039;t stand it and it&#039;s not good for the eyes. These new LCD panels may finaly conquer the Gaming-market where gamers today knows that a CRT performs better then a LCD. With a pixel response time under 1ms and more then 160 Hz and superior colors the CRT have always been the screen of choice. Finaly, LCD have been able to make it to where CRTs where years ago. I will buy one of these if the produce any 17&quot; or 19&quot; computer panels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope you guys can test one soon :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finaly!!!! Finaly!!!!!<br />
Good new! I&#039;m so exitec about this.</p>
<p>The problems have never been the ms as the manufactures want you to belive, it have been the stupid (sorry) 60 Hz refresh all the time. You can&#039;t play games with just 60 Hz refresh. My 19&#8243; which I&#039;m using right now is able to do 150 Hz in 640&#215;480/800&#215;600 and 120 in 1024&#215;768.</p>
<p>I built a new computer a year ago and I bought a LCD for the first time. Talk about getting disappointed when the screen could not make it over 60 Hz over the Digital Interface. I mean, 60 Hz was what we were looking at 9-10 years ago on our 15&#8243; CRT-screens. I had to plug it in to the Analog Interface on the GFX-card to get the screen to at least 75 Hz so I could look at it for more the 1 minute without headache. I had all drivers installed for the screen. I have no idea how anyone could use a screen that uses just 60 Hz, I can&#039;t stand it and it&#039;s not good for the eyes. These new LCD panels may finaly conquer the Gaming-market where gamers today knows that a CRT performs better then a LCD. With a pixel response time under 1ms and more then 160 Hz and superior colors the CRT have always been the screen of choice. Finaly, LCD have been able to make it to where CRTs where years ago. I will buy one of these if the produce any 17&#8243; or 19&#8243; computer panels.</p>
<p>Hope you guys can test one soon :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
