<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawsuit May Delay SED TVs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FED TV Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/#comment-53973</link>
		<dc:creator>FED TV Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 12:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53973</guid>
		<description>The latest news has Canon renegotiating with Nano to bring out a limited number of sets by the end of 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest news has Canon renegotiating with Nano to bring out a limited number of sets by the end of 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyvewyre</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/#comment-53972</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyvewyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53972</guid>
		<description>I think SED will be a winner.  Even though OLED is great, who knows how long it will take to come to market.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think SED will be a winner.  Even though OLED is great, who knows how long it will take to come to market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKDiveDude</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/#comment-53968</link>
		<dc:creator>DKDiveDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53968</guid>
		<description>&quot;...But if Canon is ripping off technology, they should defintely be looked into...&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can you not read? Try again:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Nano-Proprietary licensed technology used in SED displays to Canon&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canon formed a new company with Toshiba as they have experience with producing TV&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;But if Canon is ripping off technology, they should defintely be looked into&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you not read? Try again:<br />
&#8220;Nano-Proprietary licensed technology used in SED displays to Canon&#8221;</p>
<p>Canon formed a new company with Toshiba as they have experience with producing TV&#039;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantrum</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/#comment-53971</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53971</guid>
		<description>Who cares about SED? Laser and OLED displays are where it&#039;s att anyways...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about SED? Laser and OLED displays are where it&#039;s att anyways&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechFreak</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/#comment-53970</link>
		<dc:creator>TechFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53970</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of LCoS and the struggle they have had. But if Canon is ripping off technology, they should defintely be looked into. Of course my gut is that Nano-Proprietary is just gold-digging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of LCoS and the struggle they have had. But if Canon is ripping off technology, they should defintely be looked into. Of course my gut is that Nano-Proprietary is just gold-digging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/lawsuit-may-delay-sed-tvs/#comment-53969</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53969</guid>
		<description>Personally I did not think that SED TV&#039;s were ever going to make it in the first place. Canon simply will not be able to sell TV&#039;s on their name alone, and my guess is that Toshiba is dumping so much money into HD DVD that they would not be able to push SED anyways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But its a shame about the lawsuit, its probably the last thing they need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I did not think that SED TV&#039;s were ever going to make it in the first place. Canon simply will not be able to sell TV&#039;s on their name alone, and my guess is that Toshiba is dumping so much money into HD DVD that they would not be able to push SED anyways.</p>
<p>But its a shame about the lawsuit, its probably the last thing they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
