It is the technology used in many digital movie theaters, but a recent move by Mitsubishi spells the end of an era for the in-home use of DLP televisions as it recently announced it would go dark with its DLP (digital light processing) line of TV sets. Unlike plasma or LCD, these rear-projection TVs were anything but flat, and while they did provide a big screen, they also required some serious real estate in the living room – so much so that most of Mitsubishi’s competitors had long since exited the market.
In fact, Mitsubishi was the last company to stick with this technology, and, as a result, had carved out a reasonably successful niche, especially since DLP offered a viable option for 73, 82 and even massive 92-inch HDTVs at a price which didn’t require producing a Hollywood blockbuster to afford. The rear-projection TVs offered a far more cost effective inch-for-inch option than flat-panel systems, but despite this fact, behemoth-sized sets never broke out beyond the niche. Given the increasing sizes of flat panel TVs, expanding home theater projector options, and the fact that most viewers don’t really have the right room for a 73-inch set, the market was limited.
As such Mitsubishi pulled the plug on the line.
Max Wasinger, an executive at Mitsubishi, reportedly told CE Pro that the company is “in the midst of an orderly exit from the DLP TV business,” and Mitsubishi Electrical Visual Solutions America will now focus on the business-to-business (B2B) market through projectors, printers and monitors, but will still remain in the home theater projector market.
Mitsubishi was the final company to remain in the rear-projection TV arena as the last two holdouts, Sony and Samsung exited the space in 2007 and 2008 respectively.
For now the massively large screen sizes may be limited to movie moguls and the likes of Mark Cuban (a reported owner of Panasonic’s 103-inch plasma), as the options now include Sharp’s 90-inch LED model for $10,000 or about three times the price of the similarly-sized Mitsubishi DLP set. But with the promise of Ultra HD (4K) sets on the horizon that offer the promise of greater resolution – and thus even larger screen sizse – it will only be a matter of time until 85-inch is the new 50-inch.
I think this article should also point out the fact that DLP TV’s don’t have as wide of viewing angles as flat panels – the picture quality falls off rapidly as you move around a room. They take forever to turn on/off, their black levels suck, their fans can be loud, and the bulbs are expensive to replace when they burn out. They were simply an inferior option.
its blatantly obvious you dont own one:
I can sit 3 feet off to the extreme side and still be able to watch mine.
Been on my original bulb for 2.5 years
Replacement bulb $36
Fans are not loud
Like you have to have your TV on instantly, hasnt bothered me
Im going to have to get a 92″ before these are gone forever.
I do own one – which is why I said everything above. If yours performs better than mine, then that’s great, but my plasma tv’s outperform my DLP in every category.
So far from th truth its frikkin laughable. All of my tv’s tht ive owned have been dlp’s dating back to 2004 sony 60 inch to 73 mits n now a 92 mits. The picture quality on this 92 is frikkin gorgeous!!!! To me th only reason plasma n lcd r th standard now is bcz all people wna do is hang th tv on th wall. I aint got no problem settin a tv on a nice tv stand. And th price I paid for theez I woodnt even b able to get a 50 inch flat screen. Theez mits dlp’s are bad ass. So what if thr not flat…. BIG DEAL!!! Pictute quality this awsome n this BIG for this price is absolutely insane. My 92 is so bright n vivid ive even compared it to led. A 92 inch led wood prob go for at least a good 7,8grand. N I don’t even pay half of tht for this behometh tv. Dlp’s r teally nive sets. So sad tht this is it for the tech. Much rather have a 73 and a 92 dl n enjoy th screen size thn squint on a 50 inch n not enjoy th picture.3D on theez sets are amazing!!! Dont kno wat tv’s uve had tht th fan is tht loud but none of my dlp tht ive own have nva had tht problem. I would say long live DLP but I guess its to late.
I don’t need to convince anyone. The public has spoken by chosing the better looking technologies over DLP. But a quick google search will show numerous articles backing up my statements about the DLP’s inferior picture quality and viewing angles (especially vertically).
http://www.ehow.com/about_6306951_comparison-dlp_-lcd-plasma-televisions.html
Thts bcz u probably had a no name or off brand dlp set. I dont need to convince any one eitha but u shood also google Mitsubishis 842 and 840 series. On par and even may b even surpassing some of the big boy name flatscreen. Get urself a nice dlp n u wont regret it. Ut probly comparin an old dlp set to th new flatscreens tht r out, cant do tht. Its like comparing an lcd tv made from huawei to a lcd made from sony. Even tho thr both lcd picture is gna b way different. Check out th reviews theez dlp are gettin. Im daring to compare the picture quality of my 92 inch 842 series to an led tv. Thts how good this dlp picture quality really is. And only a fraction of the cost
I dont need to convince anyone eitha, research the mitsubishi 840 and 842 series picture quality and u’ll c how good this p.q really is, on par and even trumping some of the big name bad boyz out thr. This 92 is a beast. DLP is the best option for 3D far less ghosting thn lcd led n plasma. The price for.this monster is unbeatable, about the same price I would pay for a 50 inch led
This is sad, dlp is the most cost effective display technology available to consumers, it’s cheap, easy to find parts for, very easy to fix (if you need to), did I mention how cheap it is? I bought a new 3D 73″ mitsubishi last year for $1200, compared to my brother’s 70″ led tv at $4,000. I get a larger tv, AND I CAN REPAIR IT IF IT FAILS. You cannot repair lcd’s, led’s, or plasmas like you can a rear projection dlp. If anything ever goes wrong with my dlp, I simply open up the service manual and start opening that bad boy up and replace whatever it needs. I understand most people don’t consider this aspect of a technology when they make purchases because they do not intend to repair their own appliances, but I can assure you the ability to repair something you purchase is far more valuable than it being so thin you can hang it like a picture. Seriously you do not use the space around your tv for anything but other wide and deep electronics anyways, what good is it to have a paper thin tv above a receiver, xbox, or dvd player that are all at least a foot deep from the wall? I think if the American consumer were able to think in broader dimensions than “oooo it’s thin and expensive and the websites say it’s good, it’s the future” then there would be more of a market for this wonderful technology. I don’t see how anyone can justify buying any other display system when dlp has everything in it’s favor.
Kind of surprised to be honest. I thought they would stay in this business forever haha.