A Dutch court has banned imports of three Samsung smartphones into Europe as of October 15, ruling Samsung infringes on an Apple photo management patent.

The fur has been flying thick as Apple and Samsung argue over patents and prior art before a court in the Hague, but Apple scored another victory today as the court granted a temporary injunction barring the imports of Samsung’s Galaxy S, SII, and Ace smartphones for violating an Apple photo management patent. If the injunction stands, the ban will go into effect on October 15, and would effectively bar the smartphones from the European market since Amsterdam is their primary port of entry.

According to Judge E.F. Brinkman, the Samsung smartphones running Android 2.3 infringe on an European patent held by Apple, titled “Portable Electronic Device for Photo Management.” The patent describes a method for scrolling through photo galleries using gestures on a touchscreen. However, Brinkman also ruled that Android 3.0 does not infringe on this Apple patent—which is why Samsung’s Android 3.0 tablets have not been found in violation. If Samsung can update the smartphones to Android 3.0, they can evade the import ban.

Brinkman denied Apple’s other infringement claims against the Samsung devices, which centered on design and intellectual property: Brinkman specifically found that Samsung does not “slavishly copy” Apple product designs, a claim that has been central to Apple’s global infringement campaign against Samsung.

Earlier this month Apple was granted a preliminary restraining order on the import of Samsung Galaxy Tabs into Europe; however, a week later that ban was lifted in all countries except Germany.

If Apple’s latest victory over Samsung sticks, it might have broader implications for the Android platform: the case represents the first time a version of Android has been found to be in violation of an Apple patent. That finding could be used as ammunition in Apple’s ongoing litigation against not just Samsung, but HTC and Motorola—and that could take the fight directly to Google, since the company announced last week it intends to acquire Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion.

Showing 15 comments

  1. Felipe Cruz Casillas at 3:43am 25th August 2011 Steve Jobs resigned.
  2. Stephanie Hampton Jean at 1:27am 25th August 2011 Not good. Simple bullying.
  3. Greg Johnson at 10:11pm 24th August 2011 Like Apple is the only tech company loading up on patents....Why did Google grab Motorola, for instance?Wise up, guys. It's SOP to protect your tech.
  4. Reason To Live at 6:15pm 24th August 2011 Apple steals many WP7 concepts for their new iOS
  5. Dave Moehle at 5:17pm 24th August 2011 Greedy Stevie, strikes again...
  6. Kurtis Kronk at 4:59pm 24th August 2011 Are you guys serious? Companies should be allowed to copy the entire concept for a device? Why would any company innovate if it's okay for everyone to wait until they perfect it and then copy them outright? Yeah the patent system has it's issues but all the copycat phones out there are utter BS and they should have to pay Apple to copy them or they should come up with their own ideas. Simple as that.
  7. Tonio Johnson at 4:37pm 24th August 2011 Yeah thats some bull. Whats next for the sue happy company ?? And I hope samsung say's f'em and doesn't provide parts for their iphones anymore.
  8. Barcisław Barciech Bubblicz at 4:25pm 24th August 2011 F'ck Apple and their egoism! I wish they choke with all their iPhones, iPads and the rest of the crap they sell for ridiculous price just to set another version a month later! Apple sucks!
  9. James Phillips at 4:22pm 24th August 2011 Fckin' beyond ridiculous. You cannot copyright a freaking swipe motion. All you're doing is using your finger to move an object. It's such a generic and essential action in using a touchscreen based device that it should not be allowed to be copyrighted. Moving objects around on a screen is hardly an original invention.
  10. Troy Stone at 4:22pm 24th August 2011 Wow... what bullshit. Apple is the most annoying company ever. They release the same product every year, people fall for that nonsense. This patent situation is crazy, So many companies with so many patents and the Patent Office approves some real vague stuff sometimes... like "if you pust end to end a call" you're probably violating someones patent... come on... really? I am not even a fan of Samsung... I hate the "lowest bidder" quality feel to their products and feel they don't deserve the love from Google that they get when HTC puts more love and effort into each of their products... but even with that I am dissapointed that this happened. Apple is ruining the whole tech industry by halting innovation in favor of court dates.
  11. troy at 9:21am 24th August 2011 Wow... what bullshit. Apple is the most annoying company ever. They release the same product every year, people fall for that nonsense. This patent situation is crazy, So many companies with so many patents and the Patent Office approves some real vague stuff sometimes... like "if you pust end to end a call" you're probably violating someones patent... come on... really? I am not even a fan of Samsung... I hate the "lowest bidder" quality feel to their products and feel they don't deserve the love from Google that they get when HTC puts more love and effort into each of their products... but even with that I am dissapointed that this happened. Apple is ruining the whole tech industry by halting innovation in favor of court dates.
  12. Reason To Live at 4:19pm 24th August 2011 shit apple
  13. Benjamin Kubilus at 4:17pm 24th August 2011 Buttholes. :p
  14. Blake Tibbetts at 4:15pm 24th August 2011 Fuck apple
  15. Mike Dunn at 8:58am 24th August 2011 So weird that 2.3 is in violation, but 3.0 isn't. From what I remember when I scroll through pictures on my Xoom it is with the same swiping motion. Looks like things are about to get pretty exciting!
Close Suggestion Microsoft continues fight against Motorola, seeks to block imports of Android phones
View Article