gavel

It was a hack that the judge said could have been "utterly disastrous" for Facebook and one that cost the social networking site $200,000 to deal with. The perpetrator, British student Glenn Mangham, was sent to prison on Friday for his actions.

Whereas half of the UK population can say they are on Facebook, British hacker Glenn Mangham was, for a period of time last year, in it. And on Friday a court sent him to jail for his actions.

Prosecutors described Mangham’s security breach in April and May of 2011 as “the most extensive and grave incident of social media hacking to be brought before the British courts.”

The court refused to buy his defense that he was an “ethical hacker” and jailed him for eight months.

Mangham infiltrated the social networking site from his Yorkshire bedroom, hacking into the account of a Facebook employee who was away on vacation. The 26-year-old stole what the prosecution said was “invaluable” intellectual property from the company.

Mangham told the court that in the past he’d informed Yahoo about vulnerabilities he’d found in its system and helped them to improve the company’s security, and that he was intending to assist Facebook in the same way.

When Facebook realized its system had been hacked, it contacted the FBI who launched an investigation into the security breach. As a result, Langham was arrested in June of last year.

“He acted with determination and undoubted ingenuity and it was sophisticated, it was calculating,” prosecutor Sandip Patel told a London court.

The court heard from defender Tony Ventham that Mangham, a software development student, was of good character and had never been in trouble before. Ventham also said that Mangham showed signs of Asperger’s syndrome and could have been trying to impress his father, whose job is in the computer industry.

Judge McCreath said to Mangham that he believed he had not passed on the information he had gathered from Facebook or made any money out of his actions.

However, he addd, “But this was not just a bit of harmless experimentation. You accessed the very heart of the system of an international business of massive size, so this was not just fiddling about in the business records of some tiny business of no great importance.”

He said Mangham had been persistent and sophisticated in his actions and had the risk of “putting in danger the reputation of an innocent employee of Facebook.” The judge described Mangham’s claim that he was going to inform the social networking site of its security flaws as “retrospective justification.”

Commenting on the court case in a statement, Facebook said it applauded police and prosecutors’ efforts. “We take any attempt to gain unauthorized access to our network very seriously.”

The popular social networking site claims to have more than 800 million users worldwide and recently filed IPO papers. When the company goes public later this year it could be valued at as much as $100 billion.

[Source: Guardian]

Showing 3 comments

  1. Melissa Yoes at 3:58pm 18th February 2012 The Judge said "this was not just fiddling about in the business records of some tiny business of no great importance" Seriously??? A perceived crime against a larger company is worse than the same crime against a small mom and pop shop? Ridiculous. Not to mention jailing these guys who are helping keep these sites more secure by doing what they can't seem to do themselves and notifying them of security holes before real hackers get in is as effective as trying to outlaw guns so that the only people with them are criminals and the government.
  2. Melissa at 7:55am 18th February 2012 The Judge said "this was not just fiddling about in the business records of some tiny business of no great importance" Seriously??? A perceived crime against a larger company is worse than the same crime against a small mom and pop shop? Ridiculous. Not to mention jailing these guys who are helping keep these sites more secure by doing what they can't seem to do themselves and notifying them of security holes before real hackers get in is as effective as trying to outlaw guns so that the only people with them are criminals and the government.
  3. Amanda Burroughs at 7:04am 18th February 2012 This was far worse than hacking into a small company with NOT (supposedly) important paperwork? What the f**K!!?? What if that small business was a insurance company with people's credit card information? And how does FB not notice that someone is worming around on their network?? I am so glad I haven't purchased anything through FB like credits and such! It's amazing how a company has their heads so far up their ass!!
Close Suggestion Foxconn raises salaries for factory workers following quiet meeting with Apple CEO
View Article