antimatter

Scientists at CERN have created and stabilized 38 atoms of antimatter for a tenth of a second. Some believe this is the first step toward starships.

Today in news that should please Patrick Stewart, scientists have made big advancements in creating and containing antimatter, the substance needed to power a theoretical starship. Researchers at CERN, home of the Large Hadron Collider, say they have created 38 atoms of antihydrogen and kept them stable for one tenth of a second, more than any other lab. If that doesn’t sound impressive, keep in mind that antimatter and matter, like Highlanders, naturally destroy each other as soon as they come into contact.

“One of the main uses of antimatter would be a starship,” Michio Kaku, physicist and author of Physics of the Impossible, told PC Mag in an interview. “Because you want concentrated energy. And you can’t get more concentrated than antimatter.”

While starships are a long ways off, scientists do think that studying antimatter could provide insights into the creation of the universe. When the universe was formed, it is believed that matter and antimatter both existed, but matter destroyed antimatter.

Kaku believes that antimatter could prove to be the ultimate rocket fuel because it is 100 percent efficient, or all of its mass is converted into energy. Producing large quantities of it is currently impossible, but eventually it may be possible. ”These machines were not specifically designed to create antimatter. These machines are all-purpose machines. But with time, price goes down, mass production, better technology, and dedicated machines we could reduce costs considerably,” he said.

Other scientists are not as optimistic about our chances at antimatter space travel, but few deny the appeal of studying these unique atoms. CERN’s next goal is to create a beam of antimatter.

Showing 13 comments

  1. Flake4840 at 12:00pm 3rd December 2010 Now wait... Fox is not news, its editorial commentary, attempting to cover the stories of other stations without providing true fact or making it up as they go along... Well the following statement is just wrong, "matter destroyed antimatter". Physics - Matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed, just changed in form. In this case, matter and antimater are converted to pure energy. And btw, the result is actually an implosion...
    1. bruceben9 at 12:14pm 3rd December 2010 you don't seem to be a flake. maybe a snowflake or a cornflake.
  2. Southern Celt at 1:00pm 2nd December 2010 Better a Highlander than a racist Dutch Prick!
    1. Hillbilly Socialist at 11:27am 3rd December 2010 Southerners of Celtic descent having no history of racism at all, of course.... Signed, Scots-Irish in North Alabama
    2. Chris at 11:45am 3rd December 2010 Now I'm not speaking for the guy, but I'm pretty sure he was talking about the movie "Highlander" when he made his reference since the line "there can be only one" was a constant in the movie. Great classic flick and I got the reference right away. Of course he was probably referencing the TV show since that's the only venue that had multiple immortal highlanders in it....but the show wasn't worth the ink used to write the script so.... :)
      1. dibolia at 6:30am 14th January 2011 omg there was a tv show someone post the torrent link plz
  3. @vivificat at 11:44am 2nd December 2010 Anti-matter can also be used to create the ultimate weapons. Destruction would reach planetary scales. But no one is talking about that, preferring to focus instead on the Star Trek applications. Knowing human nature, which outcome you expect is most likely, the anti-matter bomb or the starship? -Theo
    1. Ian at 1:25pm 2nd December 2010 Don't be so pessimistic.
      1. @vivificat at 6:41pm 2nd December 2010 I am being realistic.
    2. bruceben9 at 12:07pm 3rd December 2010 the starship, of course.
  4. Bonnie Bucqueroux at 11:16am 19th November 2010 I think Jeff's article is just what I needed - an alert that outlines the main issues and makes me want more. Glad to see Jeff writing in this area. He has street cred with me ever since I learned about his sideline career as a game developer back in the day.
  5. Rod Venger at 8:59am 19th November 2010 That's it? There was more useful and pertinent information in FOX New's article than yours. Your article was mere speculation...wow this could someday power starships. No one has yet addressed why matter won out over anti-matter. Frankly, if they were created in equal amounts, either we'd not have a universe at all....right?...or, there's still a LOT of antimatter still floating around out there. Everyone "says" that when antimatter and matter collide, there's a huge burst of energy. How come no one ever quantifies that burst in terms laymen can understand? "oh...a single antimatter atom would eradicate a pea!" People want to know what this all means to them and no one seems to be willing to tell us.
    1. Alan at 9:51am 2nd December 2010 Neutral B-mesons, oscillating trillions of times a second between matter and antimatter states go from their antimatter state to their matter state more rapidly than they go the other way around, leading to an eventual preponderance of matter over antimatter of about 1 percent. - Physics answer to why we exist.
Close Suggestion Sharp looking to bring 3D Android phones to U.S.
View Article