<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.digitaltrends.com/xml/digitaltrends.xsd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Click Fraud Cost $666 Million in 2006?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/click-fraud-cost-666-million-in-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/click-fraud-cost-666-million-in-2006/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/click-fraud-cost-666-million-in-2006/#comment-54085</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54085</guid>
		<description>Yahoo/Overture supports click fraud as their business practice.  This was proven to us when we gave ample evidence of a particular site that was able to generate 50 clicks in 3 hours time, while Yahoo, Google and MSN search engines could only generate 1.  How did &quot;goo.us.com&quot; do it?  By fraud, for sure.  There&#039;s no way a site that nobody has heard about and that only displays Yahoo ads (no other content) could generate such extraordinary activity -- and generate zero sales (or even leads).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When reported to Yahoo, they just denied it despite the overwhelming evidence of web logs, but there was nothing to do except stop advertising with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google does better because they can limit their ads to only their search sites and eliminate these bogus &quot;partners.&quot;  Naturally, Yahoo cannot do this because that would mean less revenue from their click fraud approval.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo/Overture supports click fraud as their business practice.  This was proven to us when we gave ample evidence of a particular site that was able to generate 50 clicks in 3 hours time, while Yahoo, Google and MSN search engines could only generate 1.  How did &#8220;goo.us.com&#8221; do it?  By fraud, for sure.  There&#039;s no way a site that nobody has heard about and that only displays Yahoo ads (no other content) could generate such extraordinary activity &#8212; and generate zero sales (or even leads).</p>
<p>When reported to Yahoo, they just denied it despite the overwhelming evidence of web logs, but there was nothing to do except stop advertising with them.</p>
<p>Google does better because they can limit their ads to only their search sites and eliminate these bogus &#8220;partners.&#8221;  Naturally, Yahoo cannot do this because that would mean less revenue from their click fraud approval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-16 15:32:18 -->
