<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dailymotion The Next YouTube?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/dailymotion-the-next-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/dailymotion-the-next-youtube/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/dailymotion-the-next-youtube/#comment-55022</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-55022</guid>
		<description>I noticed that a lot of videos of (for example) strippers, professional and amateur, disappeared from Dailymotion at about the same time this happened. Anyone know if this was, say, a condition of their getting the funding? The vanished videos all say they were removed for violating the terms and conditions of Dailymotion, but it&#039;s not at all clear that they did; their terms do prohibit &quot;sexually explicit&quot; content but the videos I have in mind were not sexually explicit by any but the most prudish definitions. Even YouTube allows a certain amount of nudity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that a lot of videos of (for example) strippers, professional and amateur, disappeared from Dailymotion at about the same time this happened. Anyone know if this was, say, a condition of their getting the funding? The vanished videos all say they were removed for violating the terms and conditions of Dailymotion, but it&#039;s not at all clear that they did; their terms do prohibit &#8220;sexually explicit&#8221; content but the videos I have in mind were not sexually explicit by any but the most prudish definitions. Even YouTube allows a certain amount of nudity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-14 09:19:17 -->
