Forrester Research's 2005 Technology Brand Scorecard ranks Microsoft's "brand trust" 20th out of 22 consumer electronics and computer makers.
Would you buy a used car from this company? How about a portable electronics device?
Forrester Research’s2005 Technology Brand Scorecard evaluated the “brand trust” reported by 4,732 U.S. households during September and October 2005 regarding 48 technology brands, 22 of which were “device brands” including companies like Apple Computer, Sony, Intel, Nintendo, and Panasonic.
While the study found that Sony, Panasonic, Hewlett-Packard, and Microsoft have the highest brand adoption
















Showing 13 comments
RSSIt is like buying a car and getting a scrappy carawan with a leaking roof that you have to pay extra for included wether you like it or not.
if you say to the cardealer that "I dont want to pay for this scrappy peace of junk. I want this other carawan that is modern and has a roof that dosnt leak" you end up paying extra just to get rid of the scrappy on. This is what we in the computer business calls a "Windows tax"
You see windows is that scrappy old carawan that no one wants but you end up paying for wether you like it or not and that kills the competiiton totaly
this couldbeone of many eplanations way pepole dont trust microsoft and there products
It is like buying a car and getting a scrappy carawan with a leaking roof that you have to pay extra for included wether you like it or not.
if you say to the cardealer that "I dont want to pay for this scrappy peace of junk. I want this other carawan that is modern and has a roof that dosnt leak" you end up paying extra just to get rid of the scrappy on. This is what we in the computer business calls a "Windows tax"
I don't know about Tiger, why don't they ask Apple to ship its OS without iTunes and iChat.
Correct me if i am wrong...
No, Rob, it wasn't an april fools joke, as the only people that you see bashing MS are Linux users who don't feel that they should pay for anything.
helios, from what I hear, it was an inadequate contract from the OTHER company that ALLOWED MS to duplicate (not steal) the windows OS and sell it.
Now, this article is a bit too far back on digg.com, so I probably won't be comming back any more. Good day.
I started to do a long post about how I don't pirate software, etc., when I noticed the date of your post. At that point, I realized your post was just a bad April Fool's joke. Really, that's not even funny.
--------
I don't see why everyone is so against Microsoft. Could it be that they have taken significant measures to stop piracy of their software? What, you thieving *******s don't feel that you should pay for software that someone else spend time and money developing? Just accept the fact that MS is the best out there. I have no problems with the company at all. All their products work fine and dandy for me.
-----
You clearly fail to see the monopolistic activity that microsoft enganges in (fact, look at the rulings by the European and South Korean courts). There is little choice in the OS market, and it is not helped by the fact that Windows is flung in peoples faces by OEM vendors everywhere, this is damaging to us the consumers, and feeds the greedy we call Microsoft. Would the poster please care to comment on whether they have actually installed windows XP on a raw disk, not so simple, yet most don't need to worry about that at first as it is already preinstalled, forced on you by many vandors! Well that is until it breaks, and it tends to. Windows 98, an excellent OS I never had to reinstall it once, I can't say the same for XP, looks like the strategy shifted towards trapping you in, bleeding more money out of you if they can!
The tech support people they use do not know the product, and you are paying $35.00 an incident!