<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eBay Ends Negative Seller Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/ebay-ends-negative-seller-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/ebay-ends-negative-seller-feedback/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ju5t@GuY</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/ebay-ends-negative-seller-feedback/#comment-55707</link>
		<dc:creator>Ju5t@GuY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-55707</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous. Will it stop me from using EBAY, no. But whats frustrating is that you can&#039;t please everyone and EBAY is essentially a massive online garage sale. People don&#039;t read everything on the listing over 50% of the time, and they don&#039;t thoroughly look at all the pictures and or text. So when they buy their trinket and it&#039;s not museum quality like they fatefully anticipated; they can leave negative feedback, but even though the seller disclosed the item 100%, they get screwed and can&#039;t counter the transaction with equal commentary? I know not all sellers or buyers are all 100% reasonable, but if your not familiar with EBAY, it&#039;s full of cons on both sides of the table. So EBAY is making this change to speed things up, and taking on the conflicts themselves by offering to discontinue accounts? Yea, like that&#039;s going to happen. The brainchild behind this move should be slapped, then canned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous. Will it stop me from using EBAY, no. But whats frustrating is that you can&#039;t please everyone and EBAY is essentially a massive online garage sale. People don&#039;t read everything on the listing over 50% of the time, and they don&#039;t thoroughly look at all the pictures and or text. So when they buy their trinket and it&#039;s not museum quality like they fatefully anticipated; they can leave negative feedback, but even though the seller disclosed the item 100%, they get screwed and can&#039;t counter the transaction with equal commentary? I know not all sellers or buyers are all 100% reasonable, but if your not familiar with EBAY, it&#039;s full of cons on both sides of the table. So EBAY is making this change to speed things up, and taking on the conflicts themselves by offering to discontinue accounts? Yea, like that&#039;s going to happen. The brainchild behind this move should be slapped, then canned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
