RIAA To Stop Mass Lawsuits, Work with ISPs

RIAA To Stop Mass Lawsuits, Work with ISPs

The RIAA is getting set to stop filing mountains of lawsuits against people it believes download music illegally via P2P networks, and instead work with ISPs to shut them down.

Since 2003, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has filed somewhere in the neighborhood of 35,000 lawsuits against individuals it believes are copying and distributing music illegally via peer-to-peer filesharing services like Gnutella and BitTorrent. The RIAA intended the lawsuits to be a warning against Internet users downloading music illegally, but instead gave rise to a severe consumer backlash against the recording industry: unsurprisingly, customers did not like to be made to feel like criminals, and the RIAA didn’t help itself when it flung lawsuits against children, single mothers, and even a deceased individual.

Now, the Wall Street Journal is reporting (subscription required) that the RIAA is planning to forego its more than five-year-old “sue them into the ground” strategy in favor of a plan that involves working with major ISPs to curtail unauthorized music distribution via P2P services. Under the agreement, the RIAA will contact ISPs when it believes one of their customers is distributing music in violation of copyright; the ISP will then contact the customer and ask them to stop. If the violations continue, the ISP will issue more warning, and the ISP might throttle the amount of bandwidth available to the customer. If the activity persists, the ISP may terminate service to the customer.

The RIAA is apparently working out these agreements with major U.S. ISPs but has declined to reveal which ISPs may participate in the program. Certainly the RIAA would like to have major broadband providers like Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and Time Warner Cable on board. The ISPs would not disclose the names of their customers to the RIAA under the agreement, although the RIAA is like to reserve the right to resort to lawsuits to force ISPs to reveal the identities of alleged abusers in more serious cases.

While many industry watchers welcome the end of the RIAA’s litigation strategy, a privacy agreement with ISPs about curbing alleged customer abuses may create a lack of transparency in shutdown processes, whereby customers who may be falsely targeted by the RIAA—and the RIAA has certainly not been 100 percent accurate with their lawsuits—have no recourse or appeal process.

Showing 3 comments

  1. Kevin Bush\ at 9:47am 22nd December 2008 I fully agree with you, but unfortunately, some ISPS have already taken up ranks with the RIAA and MPAA. One such ISP is COX Communications. I'm sorely disappointed with them. I do think, however, that it'll be more difficult to persuade those ISPS that have been in the business for a more significant amount of time, like Verizon, AT&T, etc. This is the sole reason why I switched from Cox to Verizon. We don't even have FiOS, but I opted for the higher DSL bandwidth option... it's not up to cable speeds, but it gets the job done. I'd rather have a little less bandwidth without the bullsh*t. The only reason I do any business with Cox at all, is because they're my only option for television service.
  2. HeadsInSand at 10:22am 19th December 2008 ISP's are not going to remove their customers access to their accounts for a very simple reason: Their profits.
    As long as the ISP's have to absorb the financial cost of the logistics of stopping access and the loss of customers to other ISP's due to anger over being cut off, it's just not going to happen. At least, not over some 14yr old kid sharing a few songs with a friend. The greatest percentage of file sharers do not share copyrighted material en mass. Most share a few songs for a short period of time and ISP's are just not going to lose customers over a few shared music files. Not only that, file sharing will simply evolve to better encryption methods to make identifying pirates all but impossible. We are very nearly there already.ISP's are just not going to risk pissing their customers off unless they have some way to recoup the tremendous losses they will incur and they are simply not going to make the same mistake the RIAA made by alienating all their customers.
    I've said this for a long time: The nature of music copyrighting HAS to change to adjust to a new reality. Be real. If the threat of lawsuits did nothing to stop it, ISP's can? Please!
  3. HeadsInSand at 10:22am 19th December 2008 ISP's are not going to remove their customers access to their accounts for a very simple reason: Their profits.
    As long as the ISP's have to absorb the financial cost of the logistics of stopping access and the loss of customers to other ISP's due to anger over being cut off, it's just not going to happen. At least, not over some 14yr old kid sharing a few songs with a friend. The greatest percentage of file sharers do not share copyrighted material en mass. Most share a few songs for a short period of time and ISP's are just not going to lose customers over a few shared music files. Not only that, file sharing will simply evolve to better encryption methods to make identifying pirates all but impossible. We are very nearly there already.ISP's are just not going to risk pissing their customers off unless they have some way to recoup the tremendous losses they will incur and they are simply not going to make the same mistake the RIAA made by alienating all their customers.
    I've said this for a long time: The nature of music copyrighting HAS to change to adjust to a new reality. Be real. If the threat of lawsuits did nothing to stop it, ISP's can? Please!
Close Suggestion Joost Pulls Plug on Client Software
View Article