US Commerce Cmte Head Wants DTV by 2009

U.S. Senator Ted Stevens, head of the Senate's powerful Commerce Committee, says he wants television broadcasters to be all-digital by 2009.

During remarks at the 19th Annual Television Conference, held by the Association of Maximum Service Television, Senator Ted Stevens (R – Alaska) said he supports setting a hard deadline of 2009 for television broadcasters to complete their transition to digital television, and, on October 19, he plans to have his committee consider a bill fixing that date.

Senator Stevens’ comments put pressure on television broadcasters to cease broadcasting long-standard analog signals and transmit only digital television. Digital television offers higher quality images and audio and more efficient use of existing electromagnetic spectrum, but is incompatible with analog television equipment.

Existing law calls for U.S. television broadcasters to switch over to all-digital broadcasts by the end of 2006, or when 85 percent of the U.S. television audience can successfully receive digital transmissions, whichever comes later. Under that law, a full transition to digital television may not occur until 2012 or 2015, as most Americans have yet to even consider digital television due to the high cost of replacing their existing, perfectly functional analog television equipment with new digital-capable gear.

But according to Stevens, America consumers just need a swift kick to the backside: "With a 2009 hard date, there would be three Christmas buying seasons during which Americans will buy digital television sets." Another fiscal motivation: once television broadcasters turn off their analog signals, the federal government plans to auction off many of the frequencies currently used by analog television to wireless providers, which should raise billions of dollars. Some of that money would fund a "converter box program" to help low-income consumers who cannot afford new digital televisions to view digital signals on analog equipment.

The Commerce Committee has not addressed the potential environmental impact of hundreds of millions of discarded analog televisions, most of which contain heavy metals like lead and mercury, as well as other environmental toxins.

Showing 3 comments

  1. mary staples at 5:44pm 11th March 2008 I am so confused! Do I need to buy a new tv or what? How do I tell if my current tv is ok? I think the goverment should send everyone a rebate to buy a new tv if they need it. It's not our fault that they want to change things. Just my opinion.
  2. ladybug at 7:56pm 13th January 2008 Lower the gas prices maybe then people well be able to afford it. The country is already in a depression safing money for gas people do have to get to work. Now you want them to buy digital tvs lets wake up and get the gas prices down first Maybe then the consumers well see sales go up higher again.
  3. HSession at 10:35pm 21st November 2007 Hell, what 's the difference. I've already turned off my cable because of the high cost and it looks as if the cable company is going to raise the price again in my area. Maybe it's time for people in this country to just turn off the idiot box and get back to reading books anyway. I don't agree with this bill or the plan behind it, and believe me there is a plan behind it, but they may be doing us a favor. Besides, neither of the government or companies involved were going to buy me or anyone else a new TV anyway and that they're putting more and more crap on each season instead of quality programing. Accept Boston Legal, I like that show and I will miss Bill Maher's Real time. So let the this Knothead of a Senator get his bill pass, I'm going back to nature and take some really good photographs.
Close Suggestion AOL Buying Weblogs, Inc. for $25 Mln
View Article