<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.digitaltrends.com/xml/digitaltrends.xsd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woman Countersues RIAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/woman-countersues-riaa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/woman-countersues-riaa/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/woman-countersues-riaa/#comment-54798</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54798</guid>
		<description>A screenshot? How is that even admissible in court as evidence of anything? Doctoring a screenshot is as easy as opening MS Paint and moving some letters around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HARDLY convincing evidence. But of course, computer-illiterate judges will consider it irrefutable proof, and innocent people will end up shelling out thousands in &quot;damages&quot; they aren&#039;t even responsible for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The RIAA is one big fraud. The whole organization should be investigated for fraud, civil conspiracy, and probably some other things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A screenshot? How is that even admissible in court as evidence of anything? Doctoring a screenshot is as easy as opening MS Paint and moving some letters around.</p>
<p>HARDLY convincing evidence. But of course, computer-illiterate judges will consider it irrefutable proof, and innocent people will end up shelling out thousands in &#8220;damages&#8221; they aren&#039;t even responsible for.</p>
<p>The RIAA is one big fraud. The whole organization should be investigated for fraud, civil conspiracy, and probably some other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mika</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/woman-countersues-riaa/#comment-54797</link>
		<dc:creator>Mika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54797</guid>
		<description>Nice woman (or her lawyers)! Sure there was no connection between her and illegal downloads! Really good work :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice woman (or her lawyers)! Sure there was no connection between her and illegal downloads! Really good work :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/lifestyle/woman-countersues-riaa/#comment-54796</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54796</guid>
		<description>Good for her! The RIAA is getting sloppy, and if this woman wins, others will likely wind up countersuing. Then it will just plain become too expensive for the RIAA to sue anyone at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for her! The RIAA is getting sloppy, and if this woman wins, others will likely wind up countersuing. Then it will just plain become too expensive for the RIAA to sue anyone at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-16 10:30:36 -->
