Skip to main content

Analyst warns Microsoft needs tablet to compete with iPad, or else

MicrosoftA Goldman Sachs analyst is painting a grim picture of 2011 for Microsoft unless it can deliver a tablet competitor. Tech Flash reports that Sachs analyst Sarah Friar doesn’t have a lot of faith in the company, saying that if it’s unable to join the tablet wars, its revenue growth could dwindle from 12 percent this last year to as low as 7 percent in 2011.

Business Insider reported earlier today that Microsoft has yet to invest in tablet development, but things seem to have changed as of this afternoon. The New York Times is claiming that Microsoft will be announcing an iPad competitor at CES, and lists Samsung and Dell as manufacturers. The article also states that a Microsoft employee reports the company is “encouraging partners to build applications for these devices that use HTML5” and that a separate source went as far as to infer there is a possibility of Steve Ballmer offering a demo of the tablet running the upcoming Windows 8 at CES.  The next OS release is said to be developed with tablets in mind.

From the sounds of it, it’s high time Microsoft enters this race. The company has lost some of its consumer presence in the last year, and the media has been speculating as to why it hasn’t released its Windows Phone 7 numbers. Friar’s note mentioned that she didn’t believe the smartphone would increase Microsoft’s share in the market in the near future, and that it would continue to hover below 10 percent.

If any of this sound familiar, that’s because it is. Ballmer announced a flagship Microsoft tablet at last year’s CES, which showed up late and overpriced. But Ballmer reaffirmed this summer that Windows 7 slates are coming, and that they will ably compete with the likes of iPad.

If Microsoft does indeed showcase a tablet next month, maybe they can change Friar’s forecast of a “more challenging year.”

Editors' Recommendations

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more