Apple and Samsung have been locked in a patent war for most of this year. It’s a complicated situation, and you should check out Digital Trends‘ full breakdown of the legal dispute if you really want to understand it, but the long and short of it is: Apple alleges that several of Samsung’s Android-based smartphones and tablets infringe on its own iPhone and iPad. The iThing-maker has been working to block sales of targeted Samsung devices since the dispute started, and it’s a bid that has now been officially derailed.
A Friday ruling from U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh officially denies Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction against Samsung, Reuters reports. The U.S. is just one of the contested battlegrounds, however, with Apple scoring a victory on Friday as well, when an Australian judge extended a previously placed ban on Galaxy Tab sales for another week.
The iOS maker has more than 20 cases pending in 10 different countries, with the U.S.-based lawsuit having been filed in April. Friday’s ruling effectively blocks Apple’s request that sales of three Samsung smartphone models, plus the Galaxy Tab 10.1, be blocked. The case is far from over for either side, but Apple’s failed request is a definite setback.

How does my Galaxy S ll infringed on the Iphone? I mean they feel worlds apart. Certain specs are much better like my 4.3 inch screen, I enjoy having a much larger screen, the ability to change out my battery, add a 32 gb micro sd card, get actual 4g, not proprietary. I dont like being told what I think I need and not need in the iphone. Such as adobe flash.
hank God somebody had sense enough to put and end to this wierd God complex Apple has.
There is absolutely, positively nothing whatsoever similar to the iPhone in Samsung’s innovative, precedent-breaking device:
http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Samsung-vs-Apple.jpg
Bugger apple. They really do not like competition.
down with apple…
hank God somebody had sense enough to put and end to this wierd God complex Apple has.
down with apple…
hey apple! you FAIL! xD
HA-HA Apple-
As much as I hate the patent rules, Apple’s interface mechanism copied across operating systems are intellectual property and they must be either licensed by other manufacturers, or those manufacturers should be blocked from use. It turns out the MS makes more from its licenses to other platforms than it does from sale of Windows Mobile. I believe a reasonable settlement would be a forced cross licensing agreement between the two companies in which the company with the more valuable IP gets paid above and beyond cross license credits. Everyone stays in business, all IP is respected, and competition pushes all manufacturers to do better. We need more than one touch screen phone manufacturer… but Apple should get credit for its pioneering work.
very well said….. and the bottom line is consumers win and now have a choice instead of iphone iphone iphone….