Skip to main content

Google Places removes third-party review snippets

google-sign
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google has announced that it is dropping ratings and snippets from third-party reviews from its Google Places pages, meaning that bits of information from services like Yelp and TripAdvisor will no longer get featured screen real estate in Google’s location-based listings. Google plans to keep listing links to third party review services—so users can go there if they want—but the Places pages will only feature content from Google’s own users.

“Based on careful thought about the future direction of Place pages, and feedback we’ve heard over the past few months, review snippets from other Web sources have now been removed from Place pages,” Google director of project management Avni Shah said in Google’s LatLong blog. “Rating and review counts reflect only those that’ve been written by fellow Google users.”

Google Places pages are available through Google Maps and Google Earth, and show a place’s location and address, maps and directions, along with potentially-accurate information like business hours and categorization. Locations will also show reviews and ratings from Google users (aggregated into an average rating), and Google has made other changes to make it more obvious how to upload a photo of a particular location or write a review. The service also provides personalized recommendations to users if they’re logged in to their Google accounts.

The removal of third-party review snippets follows on the heels of a Federal antitrust investigation looking into Google’s business practices. In Europe, Google is facing complaints from the likes of Citysearch, Yelp, and TripAdvisor that Google is exploiting their customer reviews in order to add value to its Google Places service.

google-places-cafe-campagne
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more