Skip to main content

Judge overrules antitrust case against Google, says setting default search engines is fair

google project zero malwarebytes vulnerability headquarters
turtix/Shutterstock
Google isn’t a stranger to antitrust lawsuits. Even so, the company is likely still relieved that a U.S. court tossed out an antitrust lawsuit that alleged the search giant made agreements with handset makers to make Google the default search engine, reports PC World.

The two consumers who filed the suit, Gary Feitelson and Daniel McKee, purchased an HTC EVO 3D and Samsung Galaxy S3, respectively. According to both plaintiffs, neither man was aware that Google was set as the default search engine. Neither of them knew “how to change the default search engine if there is indeed a way to change it,” either, so they were rather upset.

The plaintiffs were also not happy with the alleged Mobile Application Distribution Agreements between Google, HTC, and Samsung, which allowed Google to pre-install its apps onto their handsets.

Feitelson and McKee argued that, because the default search engine was Google, it severely diminished competitors’ abilities to enter the search engine market. In other words, they argued Android smartphones would have been cheaper and had increased search capabilities, had the search engine market made more space for the likes of Bing and others.

District Judge Beth Labson Freeman, however, didn’t see eye to eye with the plaintiffs. She argued there are “no facts alleged to indicate that defendant’s conduct has prevented consumers from freely choosing among search products or prevented competitors from innovating.”

As a result, Judge Freeman tossed out the antitrust lawsuit against Google, saying that, in this respect, Google’s Android smartphones and Apple’s iPhones are no different from each other. In addition, she labeled Feitelson’s and McKee’s allegations of Google diminishing the competition as “entirely too conclusory and speculative.”

Even though the plaintiffs were given three weeks to amend their complaint, this is an important victory for Google, considering how Russian search engine company Yandex filed a complaint against El Goog. The complaint asked for the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service (RFAS) to look at whether Google violated Russian antitrust law.

Editors' Recommendations

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
Will Google ever lose its throne as king of search? Here are its main contenders
Person using Google on a laptop.

“Advertising income often provides an incentive to provide poor quality search results,” Google’s founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, argued in a research paper when they were still working out of their Stanford dorm rooms.

Today, Google is synonymous with the web -- but it’s also far from the sort of “competitive and transparent” search engine Brin and Page set out to develop decades ago. Google’s journey into the dictionary and becoming a trillion-dollar empire demanded a slate of fatal modifications to its original blueprint. The result is a search engine that buries organic links under an avalanche of ads, keeps tabs on its visitors’ every move and click, and manipulates results by tapping into the giant pool of data Google harvests from the rest of its services.

Read more
Leading Dem says Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon have ‘monopoly power’
rep cicilline ask zuckerberb about policing misinformation on covid 19 poster for 6176418334001

Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook have "monopoly power" -- and must be either regulated or broken up, according to a leading House Democrat.

In Wednesday's Big Tech antitrust hearing, the focus throughout its five-hour run time was largely on anything else other than the topic at hand.

Read more
U.K.: Google and Apple’s billion-dollar search engine deal stifles competition
Google Logo

Google and Apple’s billion-dollar search engine deal is under fire in the United Kingdom. The country’s competition watchdog is investigating the exuberant sum Google pays Apple every year to be the default search engine on Safari -- which the regulators say creates “a significant barrier to entry and expansion” for rivals.

According to an updated study on online platforms and digital advertising filed by the U.K. government’s Competition and Markets Authority (via Reuters), Google shelled out 1.2 billion British pounds (about $1.5 billion) last year to be the go-to search engine on browsers across a range of devices in the U.K., the “substantial majority” of which went to Apple.

Read more