apple-invitation-NYC

Rumors that Apple is planning to "destroy" the textbook publishing industry with a "GarageBand for e-books" app appear unfounded — at least, the "destroy" part does.

On January 19, Apple will unveil something education-related at an event in New York City. Nobody knows for sure what Cupertino has up its sleeve, of course, but this morning’s tech newswire has a theory (aka “rumor”) — and some reasons why that theory is completely false. Here’s the deal:

From the pro-theory side, we have Chris Foresman from Ars Technica, who reports via anonymous sources, and some thorough independent digging, that Apple will unveil the “GarageBand for e-books,” specifically e-textbooks. The alleged app will make it as easy to create an interactive digital textbook “as creating a song in GarageBand.” This, says Foresman in his headline, has the ability to “digitally destroy” the textbook industry.

Foresman cites Matt MacInnis, CEO of digital textbook company Inkling, which has more than 100 textbooks available for the iPad. MacInnis confirms the “GarageBand for e-books” theory, but adds that, “practically speaking, Apple does not want to get into the content publishing business.” That is to say, Apple does not want to become Amazon, and go after textbook publishers by offering a cheaper product than they can possibly deliver. Instead, Apple wants to create the tools for publishers to be able to create great interactive textbooks, which will presumably be available only on Apple’s products. It’s the iTunes/iPod strategy all over again.

What it is not, however, is a strategy to “digitally destroy” the textbook publishing industry. That bit — that Apple wants to wreak havoc on the textbook publishers — is based entirely on a line from Walter Isaacson’s biography of the late Steve Jobs, in which Jobs said he believed the textbook industry is “ripe for digital destruction.”

Even if that’s what Jobs believed, the evidence doesn’t support the theory that this is what Apple plans to do. In other words, either Foresman or one of his editors is trying to pull a fast one on readers by slapping a sensationalist headline on a story that delivers nothing close to what it claims.

This point — that Ars got it wrong, in this case — is echoed by Fortune’s Philip Elmer-Dewitt, who also interviewed MacInnis about Apple’s Jan. 19 plans. MacInnis here confirms that “Apple is not trying to kill the incumbents.” It simply wants to make it easier to create quality content that can be served up on its iPad, thus making the iPad a must-have tool in the classroom, which would further boost its sales. Assuming the “GarageBand for e-books” app is real, it also wants to sell that to textbook publishers, thus raking in even more cash.

The theory that Apple is working with, not against, the textbook industry is further corroborated by the Wall Street Journal, which reports that Apple is partnering with publisher McGraw-Hill, which will be present at its upcoming NYC event.

Many students may believe that the textbook industry needs to be destroyed. With current tuition costs somewhere past Neptune, being hit with a $1,000 textbook bill every semester is a painful low-blow. So if Apple can make it possible to spend $500 once, on an iPad, and only a fraction of the cost on textbooks — textbooks made for a multimedia age — every couple of months, that would likely be a welcome change for students and parents.

In the end, nobody’s sure what Apple will release. And, like always, we’re just going to have to wait to find out. Once that happens, then we can start to debate the consequences of the company’s next big thing.

Showing 5 comments

  1. fh0wzer at 5:18am 19th January 2012 What makes no sense, and isn't addressed in this article, is exactly how this would make e-Publishing more attractive to anyone but the smallest textbook publishers. I don't purport to understand the financial model of the industry, but if what other readers are saying is true, that schools receive a significant income from the sales of e-textbooks, why would they want to compete?In the end, the true driver in any discussion is the school, not the textbook publisher. Schools and their educators set the curriculum. If publishers do an end-run around the schools to sell directly to the students, I see it as highly likely that schools will simply favor publishers who don't attempt to circumvent them. You have a captive audience upon whom both the school and the publisher rely to make money. Why would they want to give Apple any leverage to reduce their own incomes?The true revolution in textbook publishing can only come if the publishers and the schools can preserve their revenues while providing students with additional tools at competitive prices. If you can start selling back "used" e-Textbooks, as you can with hardcovers, students will finally move towards that model.In the meantime, there is no way that these companies will settle for $20 per e-Textbook when they can charge kids $100 for the same book in hardcover.
  2. timjones17 at 2:45pm 17th January 2012 "Apple, leading US publishers, charged with collusion Two plaintiffs in an anti-trust lawsuit claim that Apple and five publishers colluded to drive up Amazon's low e-book prices, raising profits for publishers and making Apple's iPad more competitive against Amazon's Kind le." http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2011/0810/Apple-leading-US-publishers-charged-with-collusion
  3. Alan Hughes at 7:21am 17th January 2012 The sad thing is though if kids/parents were suddenly able to save thousands by not having to buy physical books for college, I'm sure colleges "would be forced" to raise their tuition the same amount the families are saving.
    1. crestfallen706 at 10:21am 17th January 2012 sadly I feel the same as Alan Hughes. As I learned the outrageous prices of textbooks at my college weren't due to the cost of the book but the school bookstore increasing their price to near insaine a amounts (c'mon I saw a Linux programming for $300 for god's sake). The professors tried to fight this but were basically told by their bosses' "we dont care shut up about it"
    2. Ian Bell at 11:58am 17th January 2012 Agreed, it has become a revenue source for the schools.
Close Suggestion RIM to release two more PlayBook tablets in 2012, BlackBerry 10 to follow in September?
View Article