Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T

Samsung agrees to pay Microsoft an undisclosed royalty fee for every Android device it sells to avoid being sued by Microsoft.

Google’s dream of making a free and open mobile operating system is starting to look like a nightmare. Today Samsung and Microsoft announced that they have come to an agreement that will result in Samsung paying Microsoft a royalty on every Android device it sells – both phones and tablets.. While it is still true that no one has to pay Google to put Android on their phone or tablet it seems as though they will have to pay Microsoft. Neither company has said which patents are specifically being infringed upon.

Microsoft has already made similar royalty deals with several other Android device makes, most notably among them is HTC. Samsung and HTC account for over half of all the Android phones sold in the U.S. over the past year. The most notable company that has not signed a deal with Microsoft is Motorola who is the third largest Android maker in the U.S.  With Google buying Motorola, we don’t see a royalty agreement being made any time soon between Microsoft and Motorola either.

The reason Android device makers are signing deals with Microsoft is pretty simple, because they don’t want to be sued. In an interview Microsoft’s general counsel, Brad Smith said, “So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents.” In order to protect themselves from being sued by Microsoft, and ultimately paying more these companies are cutting hedging their bets and paying Microsoft upfront.  There has been no official word from Microsoft, Samsung, or HTC as to what patents in particular are being infringed upon, but Microsoft has a history of infringement cases against Linux-based products.  Seeing how Android is based on Linux it seems likely that this is at least one area of contention, but there could be other issues as well.

It is rumored that HTC’s royalty deal with Microsoft is for around $5 per Android device sold, so it would be safe to assume that Samsung’s agreement is in that area too. Part of Samsung’s agreement is the company’s continued support of Microsoft phones, which basically means that Samsung now is agreeing to keep making Windows Phone devices. In a report released earlier this year it was estimated that Microsoft is making more money from HTC selling Android phones than it is selling its own WP7 devices.

Samsung has already sold over 10 million Galaxy S II devices worldwide even before launching in the United States, so as it looks right now Microsoft stands to make a bunch of money once the Galaxy S II is widely available on multiple U.S. carriers.

Ultimately all these companies are going to keep making Android devices because that is what everyone is buying, so we don’t think Android is going anywhere in the short or long term.  If companies have to pay Microsoft for both Android and WP7 devices we can see them giving more attention to WP7 devices in the future.

Showing 14 comments

  1. Reason To Live at 4:55pm 29th September 2011 MS and Samsung are alliance
  2. Lamont Helvetic at 12:06am 29th September 2011 The proper name for the technique is extortion http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/28/microsoft-samsung-extortion-google/It is a technique Microsoft has used before - they imply but never name vague patents that they claim to own http://www.informationweek.com/news/199600443
  3. Troy Stone at 5:36am 29th September 2011 Damn shame... why doesn't Samsung, Google, HTC and this handset alliance start over or come up with alternatives to whatever Microsoft infringed patents they're allegedly using? There's gotta be a way around this... invent something... what are the doing in the Android house? Forget Ice Cream Sundae and Gingerbread for now and rebuild this entire OS so competitors don't eat off your hard work... its crazy MicroNarf is making more from Android than it is from Windows Phone...I mean, WTF?!
  4. Thomas Piraino at 3:00am 29th September 2011 YEAH YOU DID DIGITAL TRENDS!!! LET'S ALL GIVE IT UP FOR DIGITAL TRENDS!!!
  5. Digital Trends at 2:59am 29th September 2011 We updated the story, but neither Microsoft or Samsung will tell us which patents Microsoft claims are being infringed upon.
  6. Michael Hookano at 12:59am 29th September 2011 owned
  7. Eric Asianman Quach at 12:56am 29th September 2011 why the hell are people suing each other.... are they jealous?? wtf?
  8. Thomas Piraino at 12:44am 29th September 2011 This is a WIN for Microsoft's legal team and a FAIL for Samsung's
  9. Travis Chittenden at 12:38am 29th September 2011 Good man! Digging how you actually read and comment on the posts, haha. Have a good one.
  10. Digital Trends at 12:37am 29th September 2011 @Travis - I agree. I will get after Mike to update the piece.
  11. Ian Bell at 5:32pm 28th September 2011 Mike - how about editing the article and adding in there how it infringes on Microsoft's patents. Its not clear to me.
    1. Mike Dunn at 6:42pm 28th September 2011 Updated. Microsoft hasn't stated officially what patents are the cause of the problem, but it sounds like it has patents that Linux infringes upon, and that might be the issue.
      1. Ian Bell at 8:00pm 28th September 2011 Thanks Mike!
  12. Travis Chittenden at 12:28am 29th September 2011 You should explain HOW it infringes Microsoft's patents? This article isn't really all to interesting without that information!
Close Suggestion Amazon Kindle Fire vs Barnes & Noble Nook Color: Spec showdown
View Article