From the reaction on the Internet yesterday and today, you would think the iPad mini is the most expensive tablet on the market. Gizmodo says it’s “crazy expensive;” Business Insider says it’s “overpriced;” Reuters was so concerned it made Apple’s Phil Schiller defend the $330 price tag; and InformationWeek is so hopped up about it that it’s written an article called “The Great Price Debate.” Those are only a few of the many hurt, angry journalists. But let’s look at the facts: Apple is releasing a far more portable, 7.9-inch iPad that retains all of the capabilities of its larger 9.7-inch brother, for $170 less. I cannot be the only person who’s excited about this… Whether or not it’s shocking enough for the Web’s second-to-second news coverage, a smaller cheaper iPad is a huge deal.
The iPad was the first tablet to capture the public’s attention when it debuted two and a half years ago, and it’s still, by far, the top selling tablet today. Apple revealed the other day that it has sold 100 million iPads. Think about that number. How many units has its nearest competitor sold?
In the second quarter of 2012, Apple held a 68 percent market share with the iPad. That means all other tablets — the Amazon Kindle Fire, the Nook Tablet, the Nexus 7, and dozens upon dozens of tablets by the likes of Samsung, Asus, Lenovo, Toshiba, Acer, Motorola, LG, Dell, Sony, Pantech, ZTE, RIM, Archos, Coby, Pandigital, and ViewSonic — have, combined, only sold somewhere between 25 and 40 million tablets. And that’s being generous, as Apple held a 90+ percent tablet market share for well over a year before any of these companies got their act together at all.
Here’s the bottom line: $200 tablets like the Kindle Fire have been around for a year now and Apple’s single iPad started at $500. And in that year, when potential buyers were faced with the choice of a $200 non-iPad and a $500 iPad, they chose to pay $300 extra dollars to get the iPad seven times out of 10. There were also a slew of other 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10.1-inch tablets for $300-$400, and people have still been choosing the one $500+ iPad. On Tuesday, Apple doubled the number of iPads it sells. Now it has a smaller iPad too, so people who want a tablet that they can use one-handed or keep in their purse/bag can opt for an iPad mini. Oh, and it’s now one of the cheapest tablets on the market, at $330. Is it the cheapest? No. Is it the best? Well, aside from the iPad, it might be.
There are big benefits to buying a Google Android phone — namely, maps and real-time notifications. Tablets are a different story. I’ve used nearly every tablet that’s been released and enjoyed many of them, but none of them compare to the usability and versatility of the iPad. There aren’t enough apps built for them and they aren’t as responsive. Judging by the sales, I’m not the only one who has noticed this.
Tablets are not a necessity; they are a luxury. You have to shell out money, and sometimes settle, to buy a new phone because without one you’re completely disconnected from your friends and family, but no one is going to die without a tablet. We can all live without playing searching up Honey Boo Boo on the toilet or playing Angry Birds during the presidential debate. Every function that a tablet provides can be done by a laptop or a smartphone, and almost everyone has one or both of those already.
This is why, so far, when most people have chosen to buy a tablet, they’ve opted to buy a really good one, the iPad, despite its higher price. Of course, there is a small (growing) percentage of people willing to settle, but the iPad mini has just doubled Apple’s appeal. It may not have a super high-resolution display or cutting-edge internal specs (it’s basically a shrunken iPad 2), but the iPad mini can run all of the nearly 300,000 iPad apps (every one of them designed solely for the iPad). They all work. It’s a complete iPad out of the box. You don’t even have to wait for apps to be shrunk or put up with black bars or any other inconvenience. This means that the iPad mini is now, by default, likely the second best tablet on the market, after the fourth-generation iPad.
I am looking forward to using the iPad mini. Eight- to 9-inch tablets have been my favorite size range since I first used Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 8.9 a year ago. Tablets the size of the iPad mini are small enough to easily hold with one hand, but have a little more screen space than 7-inch screens, which remain a bit cramped and don’t always offer a noticeably enhanced experience than you can achieve on your smartphone. Early hands-on accounts appear to show that Apple has put a lot of time into picking the right screen size for the mini.
The iPad won’t dominate the tablet market forever. That’s just not how things work. But I’m fairly convinced that the iPad mini will encourage millions more people to shell out for an Apple tablet than would have before. It’s going to be a hit. Cheaper tablets like the Kindle Fire and Nexus 7 won’t die on Nov. 2 when the iPad mini launches, but selling at bargain bin prices may continue to be the only way competitors make mild gains against Apple. Both Amazon and Google make no profit from their cheap tablets. In fact, they’re likely losing money on each tablet they sell in the hopes that they’ll recoup their losses based on app and content sales. That’s not a strategy that will work for many companies.
I am not an Apple lover, but I can spot a good idea when I see one. The iPad mini is a good idea. It’s a product Apple should have released a year ago and it’s going to do incredibly well. As journalists, sometimes we just want eyeballs. When the iPad came out, writers at Business Insider labeled it a “big yawn” and Gizmodo listed “8 things that suck about the iPad.” In the end, it doesn’t really matter what I say. It only matters what people buy, and a lot of them are going to buy an iPad mini.

Stop drinking the apple Kool aid. This device is a terrible idea, and will fail, as it should. Sub-standard product at a high price; typical apple product. That’s why the 5 is a fail. Keep trying jeff.
Ha. Do you still watch DVDs?
Anyway, I’m not “trying” anything. Just laying out my thoughts. As someone who often criticizes Apple (and any company) when they deserve it, I’ll definitely rip into this device once we get it, if it does suck, but it’s looking like a pretty damn good idea so far. The screen size Apple chose is the one I’ve been preferring on Android tablets. The iPhone 5 is a good phone, though its screen could stand to be a little wider. Apple products don’t always do everything all sects of users want, but these days, I wouldn’t really say they’re over-priced and substandard. They may cost a little more, but the reason they’ve been successful is because Apple has upped the design and build quality.
How is a device with half the RAM, and lower screen resolution, higher quality. Read your own website; your own website article shows the Sub-standard specs in black and white. Thats why the media is downing the device. Thats why if steve jobs was alive, this would never have happened. Just another in a series of mistakes apple has been making, which is fine with me.
Here’s the thing. You are right. It has less RAM and a slightly lower resolution than some competing tablets (it’s also a different aspect ratio). In my experience though, Apple products tend to do more with a little less. Apple optimizes their operating systems for their hardware better. You can tell me that an iPad has worse specs than any Android tablet, but in the end, it’s how the device feels and reacts when you use it. In this regard, iOS is ahead of Android. But I should note that the Nexus 7 does a good job of closing this gap. Excellent tablet. I’d bet that it would have happened if Steve Jobs was alive. Jobs had a huge history of contradicting himself.
Obviously you’re not living in Europe Jeffrey. It really is too expensive here.
Isn’t it 249 euros?
I’d wish. Starting price (in the Netherlands) is 329 euros (for the 16GB wi-fi only model). I would have to churn 430 euros for the 32GB model I had in mind. Ouch.. hit me right in the consumerism!
I completely agree with this article, except I would have made one more point. Everyone who’s complaining that it’s not $200 is blatantly *spoiled* by Amazon and Google who are in a race to the bottom and selling almost at a loss. There is no shame at all in *gasp*selling a product to make a good profit margin. In fact, I believe in the reports today they said the margins on the iPad mini were smaller than usual.
I’m an avid an vocal Apple fan, but I can even admit this price point is a little bit ridiculous. I also think the cost of the iPad is ridiculous for what it is. Yes, they are a luxury and not a necessity, but it can still be argued it is an overpriced necessity.
Really, in a world where women spend more on a pair a shoes? on a purse? Where a Kitchen Aid Mixers costs more, but is stored in the cabinet most of the year? Please, I want to hear your argument or what could be argued.
Spending hundreds on shoes and bags is also absurd. If your a baker or do a significant amount of cooking, spending money on a quality mixer is a necessity, not a luxury.
With a device that people at minimum do what a cell phone or laptop can do (and then some for the laptop), it’s hard for me to see the price being defensible. And that goes for Kindle Fires and other android tablets.
Apple is a cult… of course it isn’t too expensive… everyone is drinking the coolaid… if apple makes a product and you’re part of the cult… you’ll buy the product. You’ll stand in line for the next big thing from apple… and do it again in 6 months… and again 6 months from then.
Anyone know what the definition of insanity is?
Doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
But if they walk away happy after each 6-month line wait, then wouldn’t they be the definition of “sane”? There are definitely people who drink the Kool Aid and like Apple products just for the hell of it, but the iPad is actually a good product. Apple TV, eh, not so much.
Good argument JVC… well played!
I agree with you, especially in regards to the amount of apps already available for the iPad mini (which is all of them, since they don’t need a redesign). I’d say it’s better to pay $329 for a tablet with a large app store of ready-made apps versus a $200 one that has blown-up apps. Considering all the software available, the speed and the capabilities, I think $329 is the right price to start at. Apple devices are usually a little more than the competition anyway.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that it’s over priced…
People who have always resisted Apple wouldn’t buy the iPad mini even if it were $100 less than it is. Everyone else will be psyched to be able to get an iPad without shelling out $500 — which is a third more expensive than the iPad mini. I’m with JVC on this one.
“I am not an Apple lover”
Article title : Get over it, haters
lol
Haha. Just because you don’t hate, doesn’t mean you have to love. There is a vast area in-between. I don’t hate you Phil, but I’m not yet ready to love you.
I can see Apple’s bussiness standpoint. I can see people buying this thing by the truckloads.
Still: For anyone who doesn’t care about the Apple logo on her device, this thing is ridiculously underwhelming and overpriced. That’s what I will tell my friends at least. Anyone else can throw the money at Apple for all I care.
And by the way: This thing is not mini enough. With its width it won’t fit in all those pockets 7 inch tablets fit into. As I said before: I believe people will buy it. Apple will earn money with it.
But of all of Apple’s products this is the one I wouldn’t even use if it ran Android or some Windows variant.
I really hate when people try to force Apple down others throats. Apple has always been overpriced. Not worth buying.
idiot, buy crap (samsung) get crap
I agree with most of what you’re saying here Jeff, but to me it really seems Apple missed an opportunity here to totally decimate its competition by releasing the iPad Mini (which I think is pretty awesome) at a price point closer to its competitors. Even if it was priced at $250, who in there right mind would still by the Kindle Fire or the Nook over the Mini? Just my two coppers…
There are people who will always choose to avoid Apple products because they just don’t like Apple. But is it really an “opportunity” to decimate competition when you’re already decimating the competition? If Apple released a $200 iPad mini, it would probably lose money on each tablet. Why does it need to do this? I mean, it would be great for us, but I think it will sell nearly as many at its $330 price as it would at $200.
It’s like Mark Cuban and Bald Kevin say on Shark Tank: Let the losers muck around in the low end while you stay fat and happy cornering the high-quality, high-margin products. Even at $330 Apple doesn’t make as much as it would like, Tim Cook said today. You don’t stockpile $121 billion in cash by racing to the bottom.
Well said. Dell and HP have learned their lessons in this regard. And people aren’t stupid, there are enough of them out there willing to pay a lot for a high quality product, and Apple proves that.
I would rather get the $99 knock off from china.
Have fun with that. Haha. Come back to me after you’ve tried to use it.
Etch a sketch? wicked!
Apple “resale” ipad 2 like ipad mini, the “new” tablet is way too expensive. For you maybe not but most people in europe with economic crisis can’t afford it. Kindle fire and Nexus 7 is way better for people that want a cheap tablet.
They shouldn’t be buying a tablet at all then. It’s a luxury device. Nobody needs a tablet.
For you maybe is a luxury device for many others tablets are a cheap way to have internet access and an education tool. This is why Android has so much resonance because you can find devices starting from 99 dollars and ending at high end models with 500-600 dollars like SGS III or HTC One X.
And I’d probably argue that right now, Apple is doing a better job with things like textbooks and such. But I say it’s a luxury because really, a smartphone is a primary way many people are getting Internet access if they don’t have anything else. Tablets can be a cheap alternative, but sub $100 tablets do exist. The problem is that you have to pay at least $200 to get one that operates well enough to not wish every day that you had a better tablet. Apple’s price is higher, but it’s not completely ridiculous once you’re in the $200+ price bracket. If you can afford $200, then you can wait a bit and afford a $330 tablet if you really want one. If not, then the Nexus 7 is good. I think Apple knows that it won’t reach incredibly low-income people unless its price was lower, but I am not convinced that those are primary tablet buyers.
I did not say that iPad mini is bad but it is expensive, when you making a tablet for the small category you want something cheap. If you have to spend a bulk of money you do not buy iPad mini but iPad that is the best tablet till now, i believe apple afraid of nexus 7 and window rt and took a bad decision launching iPad mini and iPad 4 together.