Yesterday, a report from Business Insider issued a “WARNING” to all readers that Verizon Wireless was in the process of pushing out an over-the-air update to all Android users who had installed illegal tethering apps that would remove those apps from their phones. ”If you already have a tethering app, it’ll be removed without your permission when Verizon issues an update to your phone,” wrote Dylan Love of Business Insider.
We believed this story ran corollary to previous reports that Verizon had removed the HTC ThunderBolt’s free Wi-Fi hotspot ability in a recent update after a free trial period ended for users. However, a reader has pointed out that we (I) may be mistaken. Digging into the situation, we believe there is no evidence that Verizon is taking further action and we apologize for our mistake.
While Verizon is likely capable of remotely removing tethering apps, and has successfully pushed Google to block its users from accessing all unauthorized Internet tethering apps on the Android Market, we can find no evidence outside of this one Business Insider article that indicates Verizon has begun purging user phones of unauthorized tethering apps via OTA updates. I should have done more research when posting the original article.
With that said, an unauthorized tethering app we used no longer works after an OTA update sometime between March and June and others have reported similar tethering updates being released. The extent of Verizon’s disabling of free tethering outside of the HTC ThunderBolt (and a few others) is unknown, but the carrier is actively trying to remove free tethering from its network to promote its $20 per month paid service.
AT&T seems to be tackling the tethering issue as well, but instead of removing the feature, it is telling users who tether that they will be charged a monthly tethering fee should they continue.
We’ve put out a request to Verizon to comment on this issue, but have not heard back yet.
Update 3 7/14/2011: The headline has been shortened to clarify the intent of this retraction.
Update 2 7/14/2011: This article has been rewritten due to doubt of its source material.
Update 1 7/14/2011: We’ve changed the source to Business Insider, as the claims of remote app removal originated from that source. DSL Reports and other sites reported on the subject, but do not specifically mention a broad app removal update.
Please correct "remove from android market". Google did not remove any tether app. It was block for Verizon only.
Yeah Verizon never once went into any phones you're a retarded writer get your stuff straight before posting. See droid-life.com for accuracy.
Yeah, what a jerk. In all honesty though, I read Droid-Life. Good publication.
And you just showed how much better you are than he. Not. You shame all of us readers! :)
Nice that you updated it… but left the sensationalisitic headline, and a boatload of misleading to outright incorrect information in the story.
There is no HAL, and there is no cost to privacy, as VZW is not "going into your phone"
VZW removed tethering apps from the MARKET, not from people's phones.
VZW issued an update that ended the free promotional tether. Repeat… issued an update. They did not 'go into your phone" at any time.
Rather than changing one line and thinking you did "right" you should remove the story and issue a retraction, as it is at its core… completely inaccurate.
Like! Jaymonster comment. Dislike the article. Get your info right, your a writer…
Thank you for your continued comments. We looked into this further and believe you may be right. If the news was true, our headline would have been adequately sensational, but we've changed it now. An apology and retraction is included.
I'm guessing this won't affect rooted phones? Since rooted users won't be taking OTA updates.
You may be safe for now. It appears to be an over-the-air update.
If D2G gets this update I'll be livid. Got time to spy on us but not give us a god damn 2.3 Gingerbread update?!
I have to believe the Android community will find a way to circumvent this ability and give Verizon the finger, there's no way people will be tolerating this level of control, even if it is within some 6,000-page Terms and Conditions document somewhere.