Will Apple’s iPad Kill the E-reader?

iPad vs. eReaders

Even without e-Ink, Apple’s iPad will make premium e-readers like the Plastic Logic Que a tough sell beside its own comparably priced multimedia powerhouse.

It plays music. It plays video. It surfs the Web. And with the iBooks app, backed by five major publishers, you can read books on it, too.

Will Apple’s iPad make standalone e-readers like the Amazon Kindle, Sony Reader and Barnes & Noble Nook obsolete?

No. But just as do-it-all smartphones that play music have nibbled away at the market for standalone MP3 players, you had better believe the iPad will thin out the e-reader market.

Inexpensive readers like Amazon’s Kindle 2 and Barnes & Noble’s Nook, both of which retail for $259, will likely remain safe based on price alone. Even if they don’t pull the same multimedia tricks as the iPad, they sell for roughly half the price, with a lifetime of free, unlimited 3G service included (iPad owners will pay at least $15 a month for the privilege, and they’ll need to upgrade to the $629 3G model to even get access). Given the enormous discount these readers offer – especially taking into account the monthly charges – they should keep selling to true bookworms, even with the iPad looming over.

Apple iPad iBooksBesides the price that will preserve these smaller readers, Apple has also conveniently glossed over the iPad’s lack of the vital technology that makes e-readers so attractive to begin with: e-Ink screens. Although the company’s marketing materials try to make the iPad’s ordinary LCD screen more exotic by referring to it as an IPS display – a high-quality type of LCD – it sucks power just like any other active display, and won’t have the same stellar daylight viewability or natural look of e-Ink. In fact, you could call any existing Windows tablet an “e-reader” on par with the iPad by installing Kindle for PC. Ten hours of battery life might get you through a plane ride, but traditional e-readers can practically keep you busy through a steamship voyage.

Higher up the price scale, where premium e-readers collide with the iPad, things start to look a lot hazier. Plastic Logic’s Que ProReader, for instance, now seems a lot less competitive at $800. On some of its main selling points, like the ability to view PowerPoint presentations and other Microsoft Office documents, the iPad matches and exceeds it. Where you can view your colleague’s presentation on the ProReader, you can edit it, rearrange the slides and drop in pictures on the iPad. Spending $800 on a glorified newspaper seems downright silly when you could get what amounts to a similar-size computer for the same price.

Will e-Ink and lifetime service wireless plans be compelling enough to make these premium readers sell, even priced right next to the iPad? We’ll have to wait and see. But in a market looking to buy as cheap as possible (as witnessed by the success of netbooks) or wring every last bit of function possible out of an expensive do-it-all device (as witnessed by the success of the iPhone), high-price devices with a very narrow range of functionality don’t have a very bright future.

Also check out our video, Is Apple’s iPad the Ultimate e-Reader?

Showing 6 comments

  1. Jess at 8:59pm 6th September 2010 What about the overheating problems with ipad? Would like to have color on the kindle 3 to view illustrations and then in my opinion it would be the perfect ereader. And you can read footnotes.
  2. Jim at 6:32pm 1st July 2010 Many of the paper books I read have footnotes or end notes, and I refer to the substantive notes as I read. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears that neither the Kindle, the Nook nor the iPad reader shows footnotes within the text itself; and while it appears that the iPad reader may contain endnotes, at least in some books, it also appears that the ability to reference back and forth between the text where the end notes numbers appear, and the end notes themselves, is cumbersome to say the very least--so much so that it would make the effort too time consuming and interruptive to be worth it. Perhaps this is a publisher thing, rather than an e-reader thing? I was amazed that no one at the local Apple Store, nor the local Barnes & Noble/Nook representative had ever had this issue raised. Comments?
  3. Karen at 7:14am 21st June 2010 I have the sony reader PS700 and I absolutely love it. I love to read and it's wonderful with the built in light. I have been looking at the Ipad and really wanting to purchase one and sell my ereader, but I really don't know if that would be a mistake or not. Can anyone give me some good informatiuon on the Ipad. Are the books that you purchase more expensive than the ones for ereader. Can you transfer the reader books to Ipad. Help!
  4. Carol at 4:38pm 31st January 2010 as much as I love my Kindle I hate that I can't easily surf the web when I'd like to read a little more about some item I'd just read in an ebook. I also hate that I can't manage the ebooks in my library or the MP3's that I have on it. There are some features that are seriously lacking on the Kindle that I would welcome on an iPad. I'm looking forward to trying it out and seeing if I do enjoy reading for long periods of time on it.
  5. ereader owner at 4:50pm 30th January 2010 I think it will be a great ereader. I have a sony ereader and disappointed with pdf support. The ipad will display
    pdf just fine I am sure.
  6. Zednik at 10:25am 30th January 2010 Anyone who reads a lot or for long periods of time would definitely prefer e-Ink to an LCD screen. No e-reader user is going to want to switch to the iPad. The only people who think that the iPad will be a viable e-reader option are those who don't read very much.
Close Suggestion StartPage Search Engine Offers Anonymous Web Browsing
View Article