Comments on: Yes, Samsung will sue Apple over the iPhone 5

By: seaumas

seaumas — Wed, 01 May 2013 08:48:33 +0000

This getting too hilarious and beyond ridiculous. It should read: “Samsung, in a hissie-fit, files a revenge suit against Apple over iPhone 5.” What fun. Apple, who needs more $billions like it needs a hole-in-the-head meets Samsung who has been convicted of actually infinging on Apple designs and patents. Now Samsung wants to sue because Apple “may have, might have stolen design patents, et al, from us, but we won’t know until we tear apart an iPhone 5 and examine it. In the meantime, we file based on no hard evidence at the moment.” These two, and others, are Tit for Tat spoiled brats and I for one wouldn’t participate in this madness by buying any of their products probably slave made in China. Can you say “frivolous”?

By: lmaheshchowdary

lmaheshchowdary — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:23:19 +0000

Yeah seems like that.

By: Luis Diego Povedano

Luis Diego Povedano — Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:06:00 +0000

I think this fight will continue for ever

By: Yamada Timur

Yamada Timur — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:21:20 +0000

If Samsung was a copycat then its devices would be near same as the iPhone. I guess someone here cant handle the truth. fucking cuntface.

By: Why BS?

Why BS? — Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:51:55 +0000

Samsung is a vicious copycat that makes minor improvements and uses its manufacturing stranglehold to capture market share and kill innovation.

By: Derek Wildstar

Derek Wildstar — Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:04:32 +0000

Fortunately, they can’t revoke it w/o refunding to Intel (Intel has already paid Samsung), and they have not nor plan to do that, so until they do, they can’t revoke it, else they’d be double dipping.

By: privateer_inc

privateer_inc — Sun, 04 Nov 2012 16:54:44 +0000

It was last reported that Samsung revoked or setup the condition that apple can not have the chips installed with their patients.

Samsung did that in response to apple’s lawsuits against them.

By: privateer_inc

privateer_inc — Sun, 04 Nov 2012 16:47:36 +0000

I can say apple police, in which an apple engineer lost an iphone prototype and convinced a resident they were part of the police department and searched the resident's home without a court order (warrant).

The august decision appears to have an apple mole, the foreman of the jury was sued by sea-gate that is partly controlled by Samsung. The foreman never told the court he was sued.

iphone owned by cisco, apple tried to get the rights from them several times and failed, so apple released it anyways and what ever apple said to cisco got them to relent.

Apple used to sue or threaten to sue users who modified their apple devices until a court said because it was not a lease (rent) the device apple had no case against individual user.

By: OrbeaRider66

OrbeaRider66 — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:31:34 +0000

Umm … actually, yeah. What about the Apple employees that searched that guy’s house in San Francisco a year or so ago? They inferred they were police and threatened the guy with jail (or something like that) if he didn’t let them search for the iPhone 4S prototype (I think that was it) that an Apple employee had lost.

By: Jeremy Johnson

Jeremy Johnson — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:37:23 +0000

Wait, if Apple won the suit then why would Samsung add another device to the list? I think I’m missing something here…

By: Samuel Rodrigues

Samuel Rodrigues — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:45:47 +0000

Sarcasm.

By: Jeff Schader

Jeff Schader — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:38:05 +0000

Do you have proof of the “dirty dealings” you accuse Apple of, or are you just talking out of your… I’m going to assume it’s the latter.

By: Derek Wildstar

Derek Wildstar — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:37:04 +0000

Samsung is trying to double tip, Apple is already paying Intel and other radio chip manufactures royalties for the 8 LTE patents Samsung owns, which get funneled back to Samsung through those manufactures. Apple also owns 4 patents on LTE, which Samsung pays royalties to the same radio chip manufactures for, which get paid back to Apple. This will likely be thrown out of court.

By: Samuel Rodrigues

Samuel Rodrigues — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:07:18 +0000

I hope they win one and maybe the should start paying off people the way i’m sure some dirty dealings are handled at Apple.