Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Android
  4. Mobile
  5. Photography
  6. Social Media
  7. Legacy Archives

Surprise! Your incriminating selfies on Snapchat weren’t deleted after all

Add as a preferred source on Google

A court settlement involving Snapchat has reinforced the notion that there is no real privacy on the Internet. The popular messaging app, which promised users photos and videos that disappear forever, was forced to settle with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of misleading consumers and misusing customer data. 

“If a company markets privacy and security as key selling points in pitching its service to consumers, it is critical that it keep those promises,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez.  “Any company that makes misrepresentations to consumers about its privacy and security practices risks FTC action.”   

Recommended Videos

According to the FTC complaint, Snapchat’s claims about its service differed from how the app actually works. The photos and videos that were sent through the app, which are called “snaps,” were described by the service as “ephemeral,” in the sense that it would erase itself automatically and not end up in storage in a remote server. The FTC said this claim was inaccurate because when a photo lapses after a user-designated time period, there are simple ways to save a photo indefinitely.  

“Consumers can, for example, use third-party apps to log into the Snapchat service … Because the service’s deletion feature only functions in the official Snapchat app, recipients can use these widely available third-party apps to view and save snaps indefinitely. Indeed, such third-party apps have been downloaded millions of times. Despite a security researcher warning the company about this possibility, the complaint alleges, Snapchat continued to misrepresent that the sender controls how long a recipient can view a snap,” the FTC said in a press release

Aside from Snapchat’s inaccurate pitch, the service was also found to have stored video snaps outside of its “sandbox” (which made the files accessible to recipients longer than the sender intended) and made deceptive claims relating to its notification process when a recipient takes a screenshot, which can be easily circumvented in phones that pre-date iOS 7.  

The service also raised a different set of privacy concerns. Its Android app was found to have transmitted the geolocation information users. In its privacy policy, the company said it did not access that kind of information. The complaint also accused Snapchat of accessing the address book of its iOS users to collecting contact information without consent. 

In the consent order signed by both the FTC and Snapchat, the messaging app was directed to deliver on its initial promise to its customers.

“IT IS ORDERED that respondent and its officers, agents, representatives, and employees, directly or indirectly, shall not misrepresent in any manner, expressly or by implication, in or affecting commerce, the extent to which respondent or its products or services maintain and protect the privacy, security, or confidentiality of any covered information, including but not limited to: (1) the extent to which a message is deleted after being viewed by the recipient; (2) the extent to which respondent or its products or services are capable of detecting or notifying the sender when a recipient has captured a screenshot of, or otherwise saved, a message; (3) the categories of covered information collected; or (4) the steps taken to protect against misuse or unauthorized disclosure of covered information,” the agreement read. 

We have reached out to Snapchat and we are still waiting for a response. However, the company has posted a blog post on its website to acknowledged its “mistakes.” 

“While we were focused on building, some things didn’t get the attention they could have. One of those was being more precise with how we communicated with the Snapchat community. This morning we entered into a consent decree with the FTC that addresses concerns raised by the commission. Even before today’s consent decree was announced, we had resolved most of those concerns over the past year by improving the wording of our privacy policy, app description, and in-app just-in-time notifications. And we continue to invest heavily in security and countermeasures to prevent abuse,” the company said. 

“We are devoted to promoting user privacy and giving Snapchatters control over how and with whom they communicate. That’s something we’ve always taken seriously, and always will.”

Christian Brazil Bautista
Christian Brazil Bautista is an experienced journalist who has been writing about technology and music for the past decade…
Finding photos is so much easier with Siri AI in iOS 27 that I no longer scroll
Natural language photo search in iOS 27 is the kind of feature that quietly becomes essential.
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

My camera roll has crossed 8,000 photos, and it got there by capturing random moments (only to forget them later). The problem, however, starts when someone asks me to share something specific. It could be their portrait from last weekend or the food pictures they snapped using my phone.

Finding those pictures usually means scrolling through my seemingly endless camera roll. If the photo is a month or two old, I end up scrolling past hundreds of other images to find it, and that gets old fast.

Read more
WhatsApp clears that usernames won’t leave you open to scammers
New safeguards include username keys, rate limits, and anti-impersonation protections.
Whatsapp Usernames Whatsapp Username

WhatsApp's long-awaited username feature is now officially rolling out to users. But almost as soon as it was announced, many began asking an obvious question: won't this make it easier for scammers to message strangers? Now, WhatsApp has stepped in to explain why it believes that won't happen.

WhatsApp says usernames aren't as open as Telegram's

Read more
Forget Apple’s AirTag, Motorola’s new Android tracker lasts over 500 days and costs less too
Moto Tag 2 could be the AirTag Android users actually buy
Moto Tag 2 with car keys

Motorola is finally bringing out its second-generation Android smart tracker. While Apple's AirTag has been hogging the limelight, the Moto Tag 2 is the new rival in town, arriving in North America starting June 30. It brings UWB (Ultra Wideband) tracking support, Bluetooth Channel Sounding, and Google Find Hub support in a compact tracker built for keys, bags, luggage, camera gear, and anything else people keep misplacing.

The real headline, though, is the battery life. Motorola claims that this is its longest-lasting smart tracker yet, with more than 500 days of battery life from a replaceable CR2032 battery.

Read more