Harry Potter team to adapt The Stand

By Rick Marshall August 12, 2011

Now that the decade-spanning Harry Potter movie franchise is in the rearview mirror, Warner Bros. appears to be turning its attention to other ambitious projects — namely, an adaptation of Stephen King’s novel The Stand. And given the success of Harry Potter, it’s probably no surprise that the studio is looking to some of the masterminds behind its boy-wizard saga to bring King’s post-apocalyptic saga to the big screen.

According to HitFix, Warner Bros. is currently in the final stages of negotiation with director David Yates and screenwriter Steve Kloves for a multi-movie adaptation of The Stand. Yates was the director of the final four Harry Potter films, while Kloves was the writer on all but one of the eight films in the franchise (he didn’t write the fifth film, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix).

The site reports that The Stand is a “priority project” for the studio, which is hoping to replicate the success of its grand experiment with Harry Potter.

Of course, as anyone who’s read The Stand knows, King’s phenomenally popular epic is definitely not Young Adult fare. The story follows the survivors of a cataclysmic plague that wipes out much of the Earth’s population in gruesome fashion, and the subsequent, biblical battle that develops between good and evil entities vying for control of the world. The most recent “Expanded Edition” of the novel clocks in at over 1100 pages, adding even more heft to the previous 800-page editions.

If the studio’s deal goes through, it won’t be the first time King’s novel has made it to the screen. The story was previously adapted as a six-hour miniseries in 1994 directed by Mick Garris and aired on ABC.

The novel was also adapted in a recent, critically praised line of Marvel Comics miniseries (pictured above) that retold King’s story in chapter-based form.

At this point, everything is still unofficial regarding Yates and Kloves’ involvement in the movie, but we’ll be sure to keep you posted as more news develops.

Editors' Recommendations

Former Digital Trends Contributor

A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…

Entertainment

The best adult performances in the Harry Potter franchise, ranked

Helena Bonham Carter casts a spell as Bellatrix Lestrange in a Harry Potter movie.

Now that it has been with us for more than two decades, the Harry Potter franchise has churned an impressive number of great performances. Venerable British actors of all ages were assembled to take part in the series, and between the original franchise and the Fantastic Beasts films, many of them delivered great work.

Part of what makes these movies so thrilling is seeing great actors take fantasy material seriously, but some actors rise to that task better than others. Across more than 20 years of films, here are the 10 best adult performances in the Harry Potter franchise.
10. Brendan Gleeson as Mad-Eye Moody

Entertainment

The best Stephen King adaptations ranked by Rotten Tomatoes

Andy and Red sit on the ground in The Shawshank Redemption.

Stephen King is a master of horror, but it can be trickier than it may seem to translate his material to the big screen. King's best books are often complex and epic in scope, and making them work in the confines of just a few hours can be almost impossible.

Still, there are a number of films and filmmakers that have found great success in adapting King's works to the big screen, and created some great horror movies in the process. Often, those beloved works were recognized by critics at the time as worthy of praise. The movies below are the cream of the crop when it comes to King adaptations. They're scary, sad, and above all else, great movies.

Entertainment

Harry Potter: Fantastic mistakes and how to avoid them

Blended image of two Grindelwalds and Newt Scamander from the Fantastic Beasts franchise.

The Fantastic Beasts franchise's attempt to roar back into life was quasi-successful. The Crimes of Dumbledore received mixed reviews from critics, who called it an improvement over its predecessor while still questioning its existence and purpose. Three movies in, this attempt at expanding the Wizarding World is uneven, to say the least. It doesn't help that the franchise remains unfocused, clumsily trying to replicate the formula that made the Potter films so successful while lacking any of their gravitas and emotional resonance. Audiences don't care about awkward outsider Newt Scamander and his merry band of misfits, nor are they invested in the doomed romance between Dumbledore and Grindelwald.

Fantastic Beasts is a case study of how not to expand a franchise. From the start, the series seemed like a shameless cash-grab, a thinly-veiled attempt at milking the revolutionary cow that is the Wizarding World. Yet, despite a committed ensemble of capable actors and impressive VFX, this new story's freshness or originality gets lost in a sea of questionable casting and narrative choices, confusing storytelling, and a slew of behind-the-scenes scandals that have become more interesting than the movies themselves.
Doomed from the start